2015-01-09 11:01 GMT-03:00 Wietse Venema :
> M. Rodrigo Monteiro:
>> >From command line, SASL Auth is working. The auth is from a remote
>> zimbra (imap) server.
>>
>>
>> Init saslauthd
>> /usr/sbin/saslauthd -m /var/run/saslauthd -a rimap -O IP -r
>From command line, SASL Auth is working. The auth is from a remote
zimbra (imap) server.
Init saslauthd
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m /var/run/saslauthd -a rimap -O IP -r -l -n 10
# cat /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: plain login
# testsaslauthd -u u...@domain.tld -p 'passw
Hi!
I'm running Postfix 2.11.1.
I have amavisd-new as content filter (content_filter =
amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024).
I want to bypass this check (amavisd-new) for some recipient (mail
to). It's for recipient, not for sender (mail from).
How can I accomplish that? Using smtpd_recipient_restricti
Enabling debug for the Servers IP, here comes.
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-ERLAY_HOST
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-PIPELINING
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 25
2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>>
>> # postconf message_size_limit
>&
Hi!
This postfix act as a Relay.
>From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
# postconf message_size_limit
message_size_limit = 20971520
Here is the telnet response from all servers
# telnet relay 25
Trying XXX...
Connected to XXX.
Escape character is '^]'.
22
2014-06-04 3:44 GMT-03:00 James Moe :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Port 126 is defined since port 25 is used by the main MTA. I am
> using postfix as a local transport.
> The port bind seems to be a IPv6 issue. Is there some way to prevent
> that?
>
>
inet_protocols
2014-05-27 16:54 GMT-03:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:38:31PM -0300, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> > I wanna know why Postfix is reject mail with temp error (4xx) and not 5xx
> > for Relay access denied.
>
> What version of Postfix
2014-05-27 16:43 GMT-03:00 Wietse Venema :
>
> Maybe the SMTP server has soft_bounce turned on.
>
>
# postconf soft_bounce
soft_bounce = no
> Maybe the server has logged a DNS temporary lookup error prior to
> this reject.
>
>
No.
> Wietse
>
elay_domains_reject_code
relay_domains_reject_code = 554
This server is a content filter only. It recieves mail from 2 MXs (mx1 and
mx2.mydomain.com), verify virus and spam, and relay to the destination.
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
<http://twitter.com/MarcioRodrigoM/>
<http://www.facebook.com/mrodrigo
Anyone tried?
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
liberates others"
Linux User # 403730
>
>
> Why am I getting wrong password now?
>
It was missing the "-r" parameter in saslauthd.
Problem resolved. Thanks for the help!
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our
estsaslauthd -u
rodrigo.monteiro@mydomain -p password
0: OK "Success."
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
liberates others"
Linux User # 403730
What am I missing? Why Postfix is trying to use /etc/sasldb2 instead
of saslauthd?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
liberates others"
Linux User # 403730
Hi!
Thanks for all of your replies.
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
liberates others"
Linux User # 403730
INFECTED: Eicar-Test-Signature))
As you can see, the sender (me, in this case) don't recieve the
message saying that he sent a virus.
How can I configure this?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated fr
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 15:30, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> --
> Viktor.
>
Thanks Viktor!
With the makefile below, Postfix compile without even warning errors.
make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
'CCARGS=-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql -DHAS_PCRE -DUSE_TLS
-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DDEF_SERVER_SASL
Hi!
I'm tryind to compile Postfix with Dovecot support.
CentOS 5.5
Kernel 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5
Dovecot 2.0.8
Postfix 2.7.2
The make command:
make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
'CCARGS=-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql -DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/include
-DHAS_DB -I/usr/include/db4 -DUSE_TLS -I/usr/inclu
configuration? Or should I change someting?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
fale...@rodrigomonteiro.net
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
liberates others"
Linux User # 403730
ep
> them in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (but again, possibly placed
> above permit_mynetworks).
Hi!
Ok.
The problem now is when I put the permit_mynetworks in the last in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, the domains are getting "Relay access
denied". My question: why?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
mtpd_sender_restrictions, smtpd_recipient_restrictions and
smtpd_client_restrictions to prevent relay from it, and still have the
check_*_access working?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
fale...@rodrigomonteiro.net
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are li
verifications in the check_sender_access and
check_recipient_access is not in action, because the permit_mynetworks
in the beginning smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
I'm using postfix-2.5.6 compiled on Ubuntu 8.10.
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
fale...@rodrigomonteiro.net
"Free as
ion right below
> permit_sasl_authenticated to save DNS checks for relay mail you'll
> reject anyway.
The client isn't in mynetworks.
# cat main.cf
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, LOCAL_IP_MACHINE
The client is within the subnet, but the subnet isn't in the mynetworks.
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
r_access hash:/etc/postfix/insiders,
reject
# cat insiders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
# cat protected_destinations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] insiders_only
With this configuration, all users are still able to send e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did something wrong?
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodri
and forward2, but only user9 can
send to forward3.
Can I do that? How?
I'm using Postfix 2.3.8.
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
"As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically
lib
25 matches
Mail list logo