ny individual "uses" the policy service actually had
to process. If mail was rejected by a earlier check it might not have
been used at all.
Best Regards,
Lothar
--
Lothar Gesslein
Linux Consultant
Mail: gessl...@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ovide an
> answer.
The process is terminated, a new process will then be spawned on the
next connection. This is nothing particular to the policy delegation,
just the way the Postfix spawn(8) daemon works. And the suggested
configuration is to have your policy service run under the control of
spawn(
pass any status code back to the original connection.
Is this in any way possible? Do you think this is a good idea?
Best regards,
Lothar Gesslein
--
Lothar Gesslein
Linux Consultant
Mail: gessl...@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF:
