not much required, 'man 6 figlet'
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:08:17 +
> Viktor Dukhovni articulated:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:45:41PM -0700, Grant wrote:
> >
> > > I know this is incredibly vague, but can anyone hazard a guess as to
> > > wha
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Lima Union:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>> > Am 26.03.2013 19:36, schrieb Lima Union:
>> >>>
>> >> Wietse, ok, I'll disable the fqrdns check for now and check the
> Am 26.03.2013 19:36, schrieb Lima Union:
>>>
>> Wietse, ok, I'll disable the fqrdns check for now and check the chroot
>> configuration after I return from holidays
>
> this is ONE char in the master.cf and if i where you i
> would not make holidays
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Lima Union:
>> working. This MTA is behing a firewall, in a DMZ with a bidirectional
>> mapping (1:1). I issued a grep ': connect from' and everything shown
>> is 'connect from unknown[ip.add.re.ss]'
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Lima Union skrev den 2013-03-26 18:59:
>>
>> what can I check?
>
>
> dig +trace ipv4.google.com
>
> are the trace with hostnames all places ?
>
> if you are on ipv6 change ipv4 to ipv6
>
> are
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Lima Union skrev den 2013-03-26 13:04:
>>
>>853 #reject_unverified_recipient,
>
>
> postconf -n
>
> not just content listning from main.cf
>
> your error might just be that you have # at rand
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/26/2013 7:04 AM, Lima Union wrote:
> ...
>> ok, it seems that for some reason the check is not being triggered
>> (#847) after a postfix reload and 24 hours of operation in a busy
>> server, any ideas?
>
>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/25/2013 7:55 AM, Lima Union wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> Ejaz skrev den 2013-03-23 11:49:
>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> are you missing http://www.hardwaref
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Ejaz skrev den 2013-03-23 11:49:
>
>> How do I configure my postfix not to accept the emails which sent on
>> invalid address?, since morning we have been noticed that there huge
>> spam dictionary attack on our server, all originated email
Maybe this helps (just googled it...)
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/273461
Regards.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Rishi wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've been receiving lots of errors in mail.log
>
> Mar 7 11:49:47 mail postfix/smtpd[92520]: warning: network_biopair_interop:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Morten Stevens
wrote:
> On 22.10.2012 16:40, Lima Union wrote:
>>
>> Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release
>> (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately
>> Simon
Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release
(2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately
Simon Mudd didn't post any package for this platform yet.
Thanks in advance.
LU
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:37 PM, kazabe wrote:
> Hi.
>
> From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
> messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
>
> Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
>
> Thanks and regards.
Hi, you're not alone, we're having th
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
> Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
> To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
> http://visuali
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I’m currently tasked with a project of creating a spam server which will
> receive email for all of our customers, filter it for spam and relay clean
> mail onto the final destination. The challenge is that it needs to be
> manageable by someon
Hi all!
Unfourtunately the link posted in http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
for 'crm114 Postfix howto by Eugene Borukhovich' is broken (google
didnt't help either), does anyone by chance have that document? I'm
trying to setup a low volume/resources antispam system (any other
recommendation is welc
2011/7/14 Peter Tselios :
> Hallo,
> I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to
> deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large
> ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you know where I can find
> that information?
> Thanks
> Peter
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/18/2011 1:30 PM, Lima Union wrote:
>>
>> One last question regarding this, due that the amount of spam is huge
>> I'd like to catch some of these messages, how should I configure
>> Postfix in order to let
Betreff: Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern
>>
>>> On 5/18/2011 8:06 AM, Lima Union wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all! i'm seeing a huge quantity of spam during this week (~156K
>>>> messages) all from an smtp addresses that begins with '0
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:49:25 -0500
>> Von: Noel Jones
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern
>
>> On 5/18/2011
Hi all! i'm seeing a huge quantity of spam during this week (~156K
messages) all from an smtp addresses that begins with '0-', like:
from=<0...@cancer.org>
from=<0-1z3ize-...@bxbmail.de>
from=<0...@carnival.com>
from=<0-gentil...@aditi.com>
from=<0-happy-1...@msf.biglobe.ne.jp>
from=<0-downl...@so
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:19:03PM -0300, Lima Union wrote:
>> Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this
>> syslog format in Postfix: "Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1
>> postfix/cleanup[16550]:
Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this
syslog format in Postfix: "Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1
postfix/cleanup[16550]:.", my question is if there's a way to have
also printed the year in the date field? while looking for historic
data it can be really useful. I'm running
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 03/28/2011 02:59 PM, Lima Union wrote:
>>
>> [1] postfix/verify[3209]: close database
>> /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or directory
>>
>
> Are you USING sender or recipient verifica
Hi, while looking in the change log for some info about an issue I'm
having[1] I found a simple typo in the date specified as shown here:
20200102
Workaround: don't report bogus Berkeley DB close errors as
fatal errors. All operations before close are already error
checked
>> Last doubt, as far as I understand from the documentation, the milter
>> processing happends in smtpd(8) before the
>> 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions' (cleanup(8)) check. Thus if I keep my
>> current configuration for my new setup, using smtpd_milters and
>> postgrey (under 'smtpd_recipient_restr
hi all! as the subject says I have two noob questions:
(1) if I configure something like 'smtpd_milters =
inet:localhost:10025 inet:localhost:10034' does Postfix respect the
order? I mean, will it processs the mail in order, first milter then
second milter or what? for example, in this case 10025 i
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/9/2010 6:18 AM, Lima Union wrote:
>>
>> hi all! as the subject says I have two noob questions:
>> (1) if I configure something like 'smtpd_milters =
>> inet:localhost:10025 inet:localhost:10034' does
28 matches
Mail list logo
