On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I'm not sure how one (type of) dns query is a performance concern,>> and
>> another is not, see below.
> You see no performance difference between querying a small number
> of well-operated DNS servers that are chosen by the local sy
On Monday, March 9, 2015 4:21 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> For performance reasons, postscreen does not do PTR lookups, nor
> will PTR lookups be added to postscreen in the foreseeable future.
I'm not sure how one (type of) dns query is a performance concern,
and another is not, see below.
> Eithe
Hello,
I'd like postscreen to have the ability to reject clients based on a regex
pattern based on their PTR records.
I use both the pregreet and the dns block feature of postfix. However it seems
that still too many spamming hostsmanage to pass postscreen and thus
overwhelming smtpd processes.
Hello Wietse,
thanks for the clarification, I'd stick to a stable and supported method.
On the QSHAPE_REAME page you say that "try to keep the volume of local mail
injection to a moderate level."
Can you give me a rough estimation on "moderate level" for such an environment
where the only sour
Hello,
I have an application that during its operation it generates lots of RFC-822
format emails.
My task is to send them to a single remote email address, and I've decided that
I rely on
postfix to do the job.
I wouldn't use a regular smtp chat with the postfix smtpd daemon, because I
don't
Hello,
by default postfix reject with 5.7.1 (permanent) error if the client exceeded
the
set rate limit. Is it possible to give him a temporary (4xx) error?
Albert
> >If you want forward to different recipient addresses, then don't
> >use always_bcc.
> >
> >Instead, use recipient_bcc_maps which allows you to specify different
> >addresses for different recipients.
> [example deleted]
>
> Kov?cs Albert:
> >Thanks Wietse, it works. However, is there a chance
>>I've got a mail server (A) configured to always_bcc to another
>>computer (B). Fine.
>>
>>My problem is the following. Let's say the original email had 10
>>recipients. When "A" hands the email to "B" it preserves the MAIL
>>FROM part, however it drops all the 10 recipients in the RCPT TO
>>pha
Hello,
I've got a mail server (A) configured to always_bcc to another computer (B).
Fine.
My problem is the following. Let's say the original email had 10 recipients.
When "A" hands the email to "B" it preserves the MAIL FROM part, however
it drops all the 10 recipients in the RCPT TO phase and
