Yeah, it basically seems that there are no native capabilities in Postfix for
what I’m looking for, and so everyone pretty much needs to roll whatever ad hoc
log monitoring they want. It’s a challenge because of the diversity of
responses that MTAs can respond when there are problems with your s
ng on them, or would I just need to do some kind of checks on the pflogsumm
output each day? Obviously the sooner I can catch these messages and act on
them, the better, so the more realtime I can do this, the better.
Thanks,
Justin
this expected behavior? Is it expected that addresses which
appear in /etc/aliases for the mydestination domain bypass
smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
Thanks,
Justin
> On Dec 23, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>
> Here is the start of evaluating smtpd_recipient_
1-54-95 postfix/trivial-rewrite[12902]: rewrite socket:
wanted attribute: request
I’ll re-ask, are addresses listed in /etc/aliases expected to bypass
smtp_recipient_restrictions?
If so, I’ll give up on this particular approach. If not, I’ll keep trying to
debug.
Thanks,
Justin
> On
017, at 06:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Justin Peavey:
>>
>> Thanks for the reply, unfortunately the approach doesn?t seem to work for
>> me. It appears that that the regardless of the smtp_recipient_restrictions
>> setting, that any addresses listed in /etc/
Thanks for the reply, unfortunately the approach doesn’t seem to work for me.
It appears that that the regardless of the smtp_recipient_restrictions setting,
that any addresses listed in /etc/aliases addressed to $mydomain is bypassing
any blocking/filtering. Is this expected behavior?
>
>
anks a million in advance.
________
From: Justin
To: Jeroen Geilman ; "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
I apologize i have not included what are all combinations i have triednone
worked,
0/002/106/@mail.dirtestu...@mydomain.com
ms11/007/000/002/108/@mail.dir
From: Jeroen Geilman
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
On 2011-11-16 00:20, Justin wrote:
Thank Jeroen
Jeroen Geilman
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
On 2011-11-15 23:36, Justin wrote:
Thanks a lot, mean while i will validate using postmap command,iassume the bold
text is the reference ??
>
Yes, it is; it
Geilman
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
On 2011-11-15 23:36, Justin wrote:
Thanks a lot, mean while i will validate using postmap command,iassume the bold
text is the reference ??
>
Yes, it is; it was buried bene
:/etc/postfix.myd/dropboxes.subdomains.regexp,
regexp:/etc/postfix.myd/unrewrite.regexp
From: Jeroen Geilman
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
On 2011-11-15 23:14, Justin wrote:
Brian
fix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: Special character in email ID
On 11/15/2011 3:48 PM, Justin wrote:
> New to postfix please bare with us. :)
>
> We like to accept special characters in email id so surrounding the
> email names with "&q
New to postfix please bare with us. :)
We like to accept special
characters in email id so surrounding the email names with "", but
still these emails are sent to fallback maildir.
Followed this man page --> http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html
The name is a local address (no domain part).
in
when it comes to using VPN through it. There are no options for letting most
VPN protocols through with rules so I was happy to go to DMZ for now since it
let me get more of my VPN stuff working. If anyone knows of a decent firewall
in the $300 or less range let me know.
Regards,
Justin T
s.com.smtp > mx-ecom.netflix.com.48614: Flags [F.],
seq 48, ack 2, win 58240, length 0
E..(..@.@.,..KL.D...KY..P...
...
19:34:34.121788 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 46, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6),
length 40)
mx-ecom.netflix.com.48614 > server.workflowproducts.com.smtp: Flags [.],
seq 2, ack 49, win 46, length 0
E..(..@...B..KL...,.KY..D...P..h..
Regards,
Justin T
t is to look it up. The only readable part is
"220.server.workflowproducts.com.ESMTP.Postfix." and that doesn't indicate an
error from what I've been able to find. 220 seems to indicate "ready" which
would be good.
Regards,
Justin T
, length 1
09:42:48.299600 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 46, id 36951, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP
(6), length 40)
mx-ecom.netflix.com.24722 > server.workflowproducts.com.smtp: Flags [.],
cksum 0xa75f (correct), seq 1, ack 48, win 46, length 0
Regards,
Justin T
flix.com[208.75.76.252]
Towards the end there I noticed "vstream_fflush_some" and "watchdog_pat". There
isn't much to be had on google but it seems they are usually followed by a
"fatal: watchdog timeout" if there were a timeout on my end.
Regards,
Justin T
$ pos
ighest setting in the Mac OS X Server config
utility.
Best Regards,
Justin T
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, mouss wrote:
- write your own policy server or milter
Hi,
There is a GeoIP policy server out there if you search around, it is
called: geoip-policyd-0.01.tar.gz
With some modifications, it works quite nicely.
Justin.
eck_null main.cf
check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/check_null_sender.pcre,
In the appropriate restriction place.
Justin.
9148]: input attribute name: (end)
Feb 10 10:17:05 p34 postfix/smtpd[29148]: lost connection after DATA (5109403
bytes) from unknown[166.137.8.8]
Feb 10 10:17:05 p34 postfix/smtpd[29148]: disconnect from unknown[166.137.8.8]
Justin.
st have to resort to hard-coding the name in master.cf.
Thanks for the help.
--
Justin Pasher
to do this for each process
in master.conf, which clutters things up a bit (it also creates multiple
places to change the name if I need to). Is there a cleaner way to do
this than overriding each processes with a redundant parameter like this?
Thanks.
--
Justin Pasher
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/26/2010 12:33 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
This needs to be more specific so you don't remove headers added by other
servers. Maybe:
/^Received: from localhost.*by lucidpixels\.com / IGNORE
If you need special header_checks for your am
remove the -o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks, I presume
the header will be removed but what other problems would that cause? Or,
is there a better way to IGNORE that header?
Justin.
twice if you are
running Amavis-New spamassassin.
Ciao
Justin
I've looked and I've googled but cannot find a straight answer or HowTo!
I can find plenty of options to create lists of known email addresses
locally but this is not exactly what I want.
I am looking to be a relay host or secondary MX for a couple of my clients.
I have my Postfix 2.5.5 mail ser
? Can you not make a case to rationalise to one
email server with a hot/warm/cold spare, and use an
http://workaround.org/ispmail type setup or Zimbra.
Regards
Justin
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Justin C. Le Grice wrote:
Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice :
Ideally, the script would find all subdirectories of /var/vmail
containing the string "Maildir/.Spam/" and then delete the messages in
those directories which are older tha
Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/8/24 Justin C. Le Grice :
I am new to the world of postfix. I have managed to successfully implement
Postfix etc using workaround.org's excellent guide.
My current item on the wish list is how to sweep items from the users Spam
folders after a defined numb
t in a weekly cron
job?
Many thanks for your help here.
Regards
Justin
l_client dnsbl.njabl.org,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net,
permit
Correct your spelling and you should be working.
Regards
Justin
92/20071004/p1&ei=3lSRSpnSAojSNbn07ZEK&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=3&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dgeoip-policyd%2Bpostfix%2Bjp%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DNfE%26num%3D30
http://blog.browncat.org/files/geoip-policyd-0.01.tar.gz
Justin.
Hi,
You want: PREPEND
http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
PREPEND text...
Prepend one line with the specified text, and
inspect the next input line.
Notes:
o The prepended text is output on a separate
to it.
Hope this helps.
Justin
mailing lists, is there a
work-around or fix for this?
Justin.
Jose Alberto wrote:
Greetings list.
I am activating the check through blacklists (RBL) for receipt of
mail, you can find many on the web, in fact place as a top 5, but
first he had not placed let emails come even as hotmail, yahoo, gmail,
among others. If it got to the final 2 below:
smtpd_reci
Steve wrote:
Hi List,
Before I make a feeble attempt to reinvent the wheel with a custom log
parser, can anyone recommend a log file analyser which could output a
single line summary of every connection be it allowed or blocked?
Ideally I would like to be able to format the output for html.
Rea
mouss wrote:
Justin C. Le Grice a écrit :
I'm sorry if this has already been done to death but I have searched
high and low and have found scant discussion of this.
I have been running Postfix for three weeks now and have reduced spam to
just one or two messages getting through a d
ded message detailing the attempt to use
my mail server for spamming and request that the connection be
terminated until the user fixes their compromised machine.
Am I just being wishful here??
Cheers
Justin
Greetings,
I have several Postfix implementations successfully handling outbound mail
relay directly to the Internet. These servers handle mail individually;
one physical server relays for all outbound mail for domainA.com, another
for domainB.com, etc. All servers have DNS/rDNS set up properly
sm8136232wfd.25)
Mar 21 20:17:06 unix postfix/qmgr[1798]: 06340AE0E8: removed
regards,
--
Justin P. Mattock
As for:
To:, Cc:, and Bcc: headers.
I'll have to check balsa and see what it
options it gives for those.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Justin Mattock:
>> Mar 17 15:16:34 name postfix/pickup[1795]: 61712AE1C4: uid=1000 from=
>> Mar 17 15:16:34 name pos
-Postfix; no recipients specified
--61712AE1C4.1237328194/stillneedtocreate.com
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path:
Received: by stillneedtocreate.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 61712AE1C4; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 20
ething that would be more appropriate on the
Cyrus list?
Justin Pasher
ll beneath recipient restrictions (with
the exception of SAV), is this still considered best-practice? Or should
one follow Charles' method and put each set of checks under the
approrpriate restriction class?
Justin.
=
reject_unverified_sender
--
Viktor.
Hi,
Quick question, if one has all of his restrictions in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, why is it(?) better to put the
reject_unverified_sender within the smtpd_data_restrictions?
Justin.
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, mouss wrote:
Justin Piszcz a écrit :
RIP: dnsbl.clue-by-4.org
http://dnsbl.clue-by-4.org/parking.php?domain_name=clue-by-4.org
Not sure exactly when but FYI, this RBL appears to be no more.
This is the first time I hear about such DNSBL...
can you please send a mail
RIP: dnsbl.clue-by-4.org
http://dnsbl.clue-by-4.org/parking.php?domain_name=clue-by-4.org
Not sure exactly when but FYI, this RBL appears to be no more.
Justin.
days old a domain is?
I know there is an RHSBL for it but this seems rather odd, if the domain
has expired/etc it would be nice to filter on these statistics..
Justin.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform.
Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender
an a particular client.
In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put:
smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_sender
Spahn, Daniel wrote:
My setup is using the defaults, but the connection is so flaky that even pings
don't return consistently. My current setup no longer delivers mail, but I get
lots of timeout errors, and it looks like most messages end up in the defer
queue. Any ideas? This is a highly poli
message
from the 3dm2 web interface? Should I escalate this to 3ware support/or
is there a parameter I can change to fix this/what is causing this?
Justin.
Was curious if there were any daemons out there that currently did this, or if
I should just modify the main spf checking script that openspf.org provides?
Nov 19 13:32:39 p34 postfix/policy-spf[15114]: : SPF SoftFail (Mechanism '~all'
matched): Envelope-from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 19 13:32:39
8.78.42.28]
Is it a legitimate e-mail server?
Justin.
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having DNS issues when delivering mail on a postfix server.
The server seems to run fine for several hours. After a while, emails
start to stay in the queue with the fo
ecks as Wietse suggests, cheap checks
first and then greylisting, rbl checks, postfwd, etc, last.
Justin.
en using it for a month or so now alongside policyd-weight,
postfwd, etc and find it quite useful.
Justin.
ble
conf.d/50-user:$smtp_connection_cache_enable = 0;
After having set the paramter to that - at the end of that thread, it seems
to happen less often, but it still occurs nevertheless...
Justin.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Justin Piszcz:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing xfs mailing
list to confirm.
would violate a basic requiremen
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Richard Foley wrote, at 10/22/2008 07:56 AM:
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:27:51 Terry Carmen wrote:
check_client_access=regexp:/etc/postfix/spam_ip_regex
spam_ip_regex file:
/[ax]dsl.*\..*\..*/i 450 AUTO_XDSL Email Rejected. You appear to be
c
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:28:57PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to index "pcre" tables. Don't do that.
Would it be worth making postmap notice when someone is trying to index
one of the non-indexed table types, and give a more specific warning
about bein
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:06 PM
To: Joey
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
To: Joey
Subject: RE: F
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
To: Joey
Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
What anti-spam measurements do you currently use?
What does your main.cf look like?
(Snip
ers.
http://www.woozle.org/~neale/src/pysieved/
--
Justin Pasher
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:39:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Although there is some overlap of which method to use when,
generally one would use virtual_alias_maps to duplicate mail
for specified users, and recipient_bcc_maps to duplicate mail
for everyone in a specific
eaders differ.
I've tried sending without going through the ASSP anti-spam proxy to no
avail. Likewise using amavisd-new.
Thanks,
James.
James,
Your last e-mail, I got this in my amavis logs:
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
What kind of setup are you using there? Or is this a recent
amavisd-new/postfix issue?
Justin.
Guy wrote:
Hi,
I'm busy setting up a pair of new MySQL servers. The bulk of the work
the current servers do is handle queries from postfix and I'm doing a
lot of reading and learning about MySQL tweaking and suchlike.
Our current postfix set up has a lot of convoluted queries (a lot of
UNION typ
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Adrien wrote:
I don't know why the mail is send to ns9.bacto.net (my server here is
ns12.bacto.net and the MX is ns9.bacto.net).
Somebody has an idea ? An other method to do this ?
I can do it with multiple instance of postfix but I think it's not a
perfomant solution,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'd think that amavisd-new may have problems. What does amavisd-new
log at a hight log_level?
Of course, it has not recurred since I enabled log_level 5, I will wait
and then follow-up once it happens again, thanks.
The mail causing the problem
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the program that feeds postfix?
amavisd-new
I'd think that amavisd-new may have problems. What does amavisd-new
log at a hight log_level?
Of course, it has not recurred since I enable
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks Wietse,
Per http://www.postfix.org/smtpd.8.html
Which parameter needs to be tweaked for the smtpd process so these
timeouts no longer occur? I am
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Justin Piszcz:
Regarding the timeout...
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: disconnect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
That
-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11500.html
smtp_connection_cache_on_demand = no
But the problem persists, any thoughts?
Justin.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Please keep responses on the list:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 10:27 AM:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 07:53 AM:
Multiple PTR records tend to be returned in a round robin fashion:
$ host
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
When it re-connected (after greylisting, then it
f it does
not lookup (shows as unknown) instead of from *.newegg.com, it is of no
use.
Any ideas?
- postfix 2.5.2-2
- running local dns/bind caching server
- only happens typically from (newegg) from what I have seen (not orders),
but deal/sales e-mails from newegg
Is this something on my side or their side?
Justin.
80 matches
Mail list logo
