m: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: disable all filtering deliver email direclty
>
> On 9/9/2013 3:46 PM, Jumping Mouse wrote:
> > Hello I have an old email server with a mail stuck in the queue.
> >
> > I want to flush all ema
messages in my queue
Date:
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:07:04 -0400
From:
Jumping Mouse
To:
John Allen
ll filtering deliver email direclty
>
> On 9/9/2013 3:46 PM, Jumping Mouse wrote:
> > Hello I have an old email server with a mail stuck in the queue.
> >
> > I want to flush all email out and let be delivered with out any
> > filtering.
> >
> > I
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:45:26 -0500
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: FW: 17 messages in my queue
>
> On 9/9/2013 10:19 AM, Jumping Mouse wrote:
> >
> >
> > ---
Hello I have an old email server with a mail stuck in the queue.
I want to flush all email out and let be delivered with out any filtering.
It looks like I have turned off all filtering but still messages are delivered
very slowly.
Can someone help me with my config files? I can't seem to fig
From: kafr...@hotmail.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: 17 messages in my queue
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:18:17 -0400
Hello everyone,
I am using postfix 2.5.1 with amavisd-new. which has been working well for
years. I have around 17 messages stuck in my queue and flushin
Wietse,
What do you mean by: "(I warned you that it is VERY rudimentary. There is no
"DUNNO"special result value that forces a lookup failure)." What does this
look like in a real world scenario? What are the potential drawbacks?
Thanks Victor
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:43:06 +
> From: postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: always_bcc
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Jumping Mouse wrote:
>
> > I have set up always_bcc = jour...@mydomain.org
Thank you for the reply!
> Jumping Mouse:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have set up always_bcc = jour...@mydomain.org for an email
> > archiving account. How can bypass always_bcc for certain senders?
>
> It's called *always*_bcc for a reason...
Yes tha
Hello everyone,
I have set up always_bcc = jour...@mydomain.org for an email archiving
account.
How can bypass always_bcc for certain senders? for example I do not want to
always_bcc any email that comes from
aud...@mydomain.com and or aud...@mydomain.com
Thanks in advance for any help.
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to filter out emails that have been flagged as spam using Maildrop
but am not able to get it to work.
Here is my configuration: (I want to create .Junkmail folder if it does not
exist, sub-scribe .Junkmail folder and move all email with X-Spam-Flag= Yes to
the .Junkma
I am using a inbound gateway: postfix smtp server to deliver email locally and
forward email to Google Servers for Google apps email accounts.
I would like to make sure that all email that is forwarded to the google
servers passes through an encrypted connection. Does postfix do this by
defau
When testing my smtp connection I get a timeout after 16 seconds. using
telnet I will finally get a connected after more than 16 seconds. I used to get
a connection right away.
Please help me to troubleshoot this. The server is not loaded at all! DNS
servers are responsive so I am at a
Hello all my postfix smpt server started acting strangely after a year of
flawless functioning.
I am getting these messages in my mailqueue:
host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 From MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025) during
fwd-connect (Negative greeting: at (eval 87) line 442, line 6215.):
id=127
>solution proposed by mouss:
>remove: this line:xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprc
I removed xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprcrestarted all services
but am still getting the following in my logs...
Jul 17 06:18:42 mail spamc[32239]: connect(AF_INET)
> Ouch. Line ends are a Good Thing. Also, please don't top-post replies,
> as it makes the archives hard to follow. Thank you.
>
> Anyway, I assume that the PIX "fixup" was the whole problem. This is a
> well-known and common issue, with just about any site behind a PIX.
> Complain to your vendo
Ok I took a tcpdumpt on a "delay" occassion, it takes about 22 seconds to
send a small message with no attachments.. Will also monitor timeouts and send
tcp dump of this.
r...@mail:/home/adnim1# tcpdump -n port 587tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -vv for full protocol decodelis
> >
> > I think it may be... I will check. you think this might be an issue
> > with delays?
> Some antivirus and Cisco "FixUp" are examples of security by obscurity.
> Many of which do it poorly.
>
> It is recommended to turn off Cisco SMTP fixup because it does not
> protect anything truly s
>
> >
> >
> > I get a very quick banner response when I telnet to port 25 and port
> > 587 I do get different banners
> > for port 25 I get:
> > 220 *
> >
> Cisco Pix running SMTP 'Fixup' ?
>
>
I think it may be... I will check. you think t
>
> You can resolve the IP of their firewall, by executing (on the postfix box):
>
> host 1.2.3.4
>
> where 1.2.3.4 is the firewall IP. if this returns a name, say
> joe.example.com, then resolve this name:
>
> host joe.example.com
>
>
> but if the IP and the name never change, the results a
rg
> Subject: Re: smtp time outs and delays
>
> On 7/18/2009, Jumping Mouse (kafr...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > Here is my main.cf
> >
> > # Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format
>
> postconf -n output only pleas
Thanks again mouss.
most of my users are in an office network behind a firewall and are using an
ms server 2003 dns for local lookups my isp's dns server for non local
lookups. My ISP is also hosting the dns records for the postfix server.
How can I test if postfix is getting an NXDOMAIN quic
continued from "smtp time outs and delays + spamc being called when using
amavis-new"
mouss wrote:
"hard to tell, but a first bet is reverse DNS lookup. if the clients use
a private IP space, make sure your DNS server answers for thecorresponding
reverse zone so that postfix gets an NXDOMAIN qui
>solution proposed by mouss:
>remove: this line:xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprc
I see that this that having this line in maildroprc can cause a delay of
about 5 seconds per email message, could this have been causing major delays
in delivery during high server load
solution proposed by mouss:
remove: this line:xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc"from maildroprc
I am noticing the following in the mail logs:
Jul 17 06:18:42 mail spamc[32239]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1
failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refusedJul 17 06:18:43 mail
spamc[32239]
ot;spamc
being called when using amavis-new"
thanks.
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:43:59 +0200
> From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: smtp time outs and delays + spamc being called when using
> amavis-new
>
> Jumping Mouse a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I am using postfix 2.5.4 with amavisd-new, courier imap, clamd, spamassasin,
maildrop on Ubuntu 6.06.2 LTS server which I inherited.
I have been struggling alone to try to resolve two issues and hope that i can
get some help here.
Issue 1.
Many of my users have been encounteri
27 matches
Mail list logo
