Hi, no clue about MS service, but it does not seem postfix related.
You might want to direct this to the mailop list -
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Josef
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:06 PM Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since this morning
I think you mean collate.pl by Viktor Dukhovni
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/tree/master/postfix/auxiliary/collate
J.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022, 23:43 Dan Mahoney wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I seem to recall discussion on this list of some tool that can look at
> your maillog and show a single-line
Hi,
> smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3 !TLSv1 !TLSv1.1 !TLSv1.2 !TLSv1.3
By this you basically DISABLED all tls protocols. The ! means "not".
Try this:
smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1, !TLSv1.1
You can use
https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/#server=postfix&version=3.4.8&config=i
I believe I have encountered something similar about a year back. I
ended up doing this (becasue I wanted to have ecc in place):
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/tls/rsa/_.acme.com.rsa.fullchain.pem
smtpd_tls_eccert_file = /etc/postfix/tls/ecc/_.acme.com.ecc.fullchain.pem
smtpd_tls_eckey_file =
For the smtp, you only need 25. 465 is smtps and 587 submission - sub.
2525 is not needed either.
For pure relay the 25 is the only port you need, external mailservers
will not relay to any other port, unless specifically configured.
Josef
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:54 PM White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:14 PM wrote:
> > likely at least a minimal attempt to avoid naming conflicts. renaming
> > forked the code (hopefully) helps avoid blaming Wietse for whatever gets
> > broken in that fork.
>
> Wait, so its a fork of Postfix?
>
No.
> And not the same code as what Wie
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:45 PM Daniel Ryšlink
wrote:
> Dear esteemed Postfix users and experts!
>
> First, let me apologize for intruding and discussing a Postfix unrelated
> topic, but as a person whose health was affected by poor quality LCD (and
> other) screens, I feel compelled t
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:22 PM wrote:
> To whomever is in charge of the postfix.org site;
>
> Just feedback, i noticed the site has been updated and the background
> was changed to white. I personally preferred the darker non-white
> background because it wasn't as bright/hard on the eyes. Not sa
Thanks, the messages in hold are mostly spams evaluated by rspamd. So my
desire is "just" to clean them and not really send bounces back.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:02 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Josef Vyb?hal:
> > Hi list,
> > is it okay (meaning if I am unknowingly breaking something by doing it)
Hi list,
is it okay (meaning if I am unknowingly breaking something by doing it)
when I clear "on hold" messages on the filesystem level? Meaning that I am
periodically cleaning /var/spool/postfix/hold directory from files older
than x.
Is it acceptable approach, or should I rather stick to postsu
10 matches
Mail list logo
