>> I suppose there is probably nothing I can do about it?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#prepend_delivered_header
>
> currenly immplements (and detects loops) with delivery to "|command",
> /file/name, or !$HOME/.forward.
>
> Doing this also for virtual alias expansion would require
this issue to have a work-around and close it. Thanks for
all your assistance.
Lund
--
Jorgen Lundman |
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo| +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell)
Japan| +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home)
.
Running with L4 health checks for 20mins and:
# ps -edaf| grep smtpd | wc -l
2
Everything "appears to work" but I have no put it on production. I do wish
there was a nicer way to detect the problem than to use a zero-write.
Possibly signal the problem in peekfd(), and act on
it.
Looks like we will have to use "smtpd_timeout" to contain the problem until
the hardware L4 can be replaced.
Thanks,
Lund
--
Jorgen Lundman |
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo| +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell)
Japan| +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> The Postfix process count corresponds to the number of client
> sessions. If the number of processes goes up, either the number
> of clients goes up or the sessions last longer, i.e. clients aren't
> closing the connection. You would notice that fr
>
> just fix clients not proper closing connections
>
snoop of L4 connections confirm "QUIT", Rst and Rst+Ack. As far as I can
tell, they are dropped as expected.
Lund
--
Jorgen Lundman |
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
Hello list,
In Nov we updated OpenSSL due to latest security alerts, and at the same
time, placed Postfix-2.7.2 everywhere (in house package version).
>From this day, the graphs charting the number of smtpd processes have gone
from ~100 to about ~500. So it is definitely a recent change we did,
ammers get cut off, but retain the
efficiency of pipelining.
Should we simply disable pipelining on the SMTP clusters? Customers
"probably" are not negatively affected by this setting.
--
Jorgen Lundman |
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
