> "Ken" == Ken Gillett via Postfix-users writes:
> Thank you for your words of wisdom Wietse. 😉
> I rather thought you understood how 'silly' it would be to run a find command
> for postconf as I had already clearly explained (at least 3 times 🙂) I knew
> where both versions were located an
> "Wietse" == Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> writes:
> John Stoffel:
>> > "Wietse" == Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
>> > writes:
>>
>> > Postfix lists are run by Mailman3, configured to replace the From:
>> > addres with the list address; Mailman3 then unconditionally add
> "Wietse" == Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> writes:
> Postfix lists are run by Mailman3, configured to replace the From:
> addres with the list address; Mailman3 then unconditionally adds
> the original From: addres to Reply-to:. This is standard Mailman
> damage control for DMARC.
> "Wietse" == Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> writes:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
> by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
As a recovering sendmail user
> "Jim" == Jim Wright via Postfix-users writes:
> Hey all. Recently my ISP (Spectrum) decided (after this was working for
> me for almost 20 years) to make it impossible for a self hosted domain
> to relay through their SMTP server unless it was actually a spectrum.com
> email address bei
>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
>>>>> writes:
> On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> So what's the option for a more
> "mailmary---" == mailmary--- via Postfix-users
> writes:
> Unfortunately I've seen this crash as well, its actually quite
> frequent in my case and I'm using a newer version of OpenDMARC than
> you:
> # opendmarc -V
> opendmarc: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2
> SMFI_VERSION 0x101
>
