- Original Message -
From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "postfix users list"
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: mail aliases & spam
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
cake and eat it to. My belief is that by employing t
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In setting up the pre-queue spam filter, I followed the instructions
here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
What are you using as your smtpd_proxy_filter? Seems it could do better...
Spampd and spamassassin.
- Original Message -
From: "Jorey Bump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't rely solely on SpamAssassin. There are other techniques that are
less expensive and can eliminate obvious spam with virtually no false
positives (and others that may have an acceptable level of false
positives, though
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Heim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: mail aliases & spam
On 8/14/2008, John Heim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Exactly!
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Heim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Postfix users"
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: mail aliases & spam
On 8/14/2008 11:54 AM, John Heim wrote:
G
I'm running a system with about 300 users. I run pflogsumm every night to
generate mail log stats. The bounce detail lists 300 - 400 servers rejecting
mail because the user is unknown. The vast majority of servers has 1 or 2
such rejections. This puzzles me. My users can't possibly be sendin
