[pfx] Re: tlsproxy service role client is not available

2025-08-01 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
Thank You Wietse and Viktor, Really appreciate Your help :) All working fine now. Best Regards John pt., 1 sie 2025 o 16:50 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > > John Doe: > > > Hi Wietse and Viktor, > > > > > > Replying

[pfx] Re: tlsproxy service role client is not available

2025-07-31 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
74 c1 66 0f da c1 66 0f ef c9 66 0f czw., 31 lip 2025 o 17:52 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:33:53PM +0200, John Doe via Postfix-users wrote: > > > Any clue what is happening here ? > > > > post

[pfx] Re: tlsproxy service role client is not available

2025-07-31 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
:16 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > > John Doe via Postfix-users: > > > postfix/master[2399665]: warning: process > > > /app/PFXpostfix/postfix/usr/libexec/postfix/tlsproxy pid 2399702 >

[pfx] Re: tlsproxy service role client is not available

2025-07-31 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
< postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > John Doe via Postfix-users: > > postfix/master[2399665]: warning: process > > /app/PFXpostfix/postfix/usr/libexec/postfix/tlsproxy pid 2399702 killed > by > > signal 11 > > > > And it'

[pfx] tlsproxy service role client is not available

2025-07-31 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
Hi All, Postfix setup is same as on old rhel7 server, now I'm using rhel8. Postfix version differs and it's 3.8.5 on new server. Old one is 3.3.6. Certs are there, working fine on other box. Any clue what is happening here ? postfix/tlsproxy[2399702]: CONNECT to [10.10.10.20]:25 postfix/s

[pfx] Postfix relayhost dns records question

2025-03-11 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
Hi, Can't find answer, about postfix dns preferences and dns lookup performance. Let's say I have relayhost with FQDN: srv2378948273.mydomain.com I'd like to create a DNS Alias record or A record to use more friendly name: relayhost1.mydomain.com Does postfix prefers A record more than DNA Alia

[pfx] Postfix relayhost dns records question

2025-03-11 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
Hi, Can't find answer, about postfix dns preferences and dns lookup performance. Let's say I have relayhost with FQDN: srv2378948273.mydomain.com I'd like to create a DNS Alias record or A record to use more friendly name: relayhost1.mydomain.com Does postfix prefers A record more than DNA Alia

[pfx] Re: Postfix not doing round robin for equal weight MX records

2024-05-17 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
niedz., 12 maj 2024 o 19:10 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:06PM -0400, Wietse Venema via > Postfix-users wrote: > > ... Mystery solved. Thank You Wietse and Viktor for tips about my is

[pfx] Re: Postfix not doing round robin for equal weight MX records

2024-05-10 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
25 5694 nlp5.loc-prd.net[10.26.15.34]:25 $ Best regards, John pt., 10 maj 2024 o 16:13 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a): > John Doe via Postfix-users: > > Hi, > > > > I was hoping for real MX record rou

[pfx] Postfix not doing round robin for equal weight MX records

2024-05-10 Thread John Doe via Postfix-users
Hi, I was hoping for real MX record round-robin but it does not work on one of my servers. Somehow, postfix is prioritising one of the MX more than others. Always the same: nlp3.loc-prd.net All MX servers, are in local network to this client mailserver. We have relayhost in main.cf: relayh