Thank You Wietse and Viktor,
Really appreciate Your help :) All working fine now.
Best Regards
John
pt., 1 sie 2025 o 16:50 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > John Doe:
> > > Hi Wietse and Vikt
74 c1 66 0f da c1 66 0f ef c9 66 0f
czw., 31 lip 2025 o 17:52 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:33:53PM +0200, John Doe via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > Any clue what is happening here ?
> >
> > post
:16 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > John Doe via Postfix-users:
> > > postfix/master[2399665]: warning: process
> > > /app/PFXpostfix/postfix/usr/libexec/postfix/tlsproxy pid 2399702
>
<
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> John Doe via Postfix-users:
> > postfix/master[2399665]: warning: process
> > /app/PFXpostfix/postfix/usr/libexec/postfix/tlsproxy pid 2399702 killed
> by
> > signal 11
> >
> > And it'
Hi All,
Postfix setup is same as on old rhel7 server, now I'm using rhel8.
Postfix version differs and it's 3.8.5 on new server.
Old one is 3.3.6.
Certs are there, working fine on other box.
Any clue what is happening here ?
postfix/tlsproxy[2399702]: CONNECT to [10.10.10.20]:25
postfix/s
Hi,
Can't find answer, about postfix dns preferences and dns lookup performance.
Let's say I have relayhost with FQDN: srv2378948273.mydomain.com
I'd like to create a DNS Alias record or A record to use more friendly name:
relayhost1.mydomain.com
Does postfix prefers A record more than DNA Alia
Hi,
Can't find answer, about postfix dns preferences and dns lookup performance.
Let's say I have relayhost with FQDN: srv2378948273.mydomain.com
I'd like to create a DNS Alias record or A record to use more friendly name:
relayhost1.mydomain.com
Does postfix prefers A record more than DNA Alia
niedz., 12 maj 2024 o 19:10 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:06PM -0400, Wietse Venema via
> Postfix-users wrote:
>
> ...
Mystery solved.
Thank You Wietse and Viktor for tips about my is
25
5694 nlp5.loc-prd.net[10.26.15.34]:25
$
Best regards,
John
pt., 10 maj 2024 o 16:13 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> napisał(a):
> John Doe via Postfix-users:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was hoping for real MX record rou
Hi,
I was hoping for real MX record round-robin but it does not work on one of
my servers.
Somehow, postfix is prioritising one of the MX more than others.
Always the same: nlp3.loc-prd.net
All MX servers, are in local network to this client mailserver.
We have relayhost in main.cf:
relayh
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY OFF-LIST
>
> Am 18.07.2012 13:18, schrieb John Doe:
>>>> Thank you for answering and sorry for the double posting.
>>>> How can i debug this issue?
>>>> How can i stop
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 18/07/2012 11:58, John Doe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> John Doe:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> A few days ago i receive
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> John Doe:
>> Hello,
>> A few days ago i received a email that has a send and a received
>> (from/to) field set to someth...@gmail.com, and in the header the
>> X-Original-To is set to myaddr...@mydomain.com and thi
Hello,
A few days ago i received a email that has a send and a received
(from/to) field set to someth...@gmail.com, and in the header the
X-Original-To is set to myaddr...@mydomain.com and this mail gets
delivered to my account.
In the header i can see :
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: myaddr...@myd
Hello,
A few days ago i received a email that has a send and a received
(from/to) field set to someth...@gmail.com, and in the header the
X-Original-To is set to myaddr...@mydomain.com and this mail gets
delivered to my account.
In the header i can see :
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: myaddr...@myd
From: Ansgar Wiechers
> On 2012-06-18 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>> Are there any High Availability Solution for Postfix SMTP Server meaning
>> primary and secondary nodes in Active/Active or Active/Passive Clustering
>> mode?
>
> Please describe the problem you're trying to solve instead of what
From: Stan Hoeppner
> On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>> OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers
>> are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server
>> for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ).
>> So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists
From: Jonathan Tripathy
> While your idea would work in HA mode, would that cause any problems if
> both
postfix servers were used at the same time? (i.e. load balanced)
> In fact I may be able to answer my own question by saying yes, it would
> cause
>a problem as you're not supposed to
From: Jonathan Tripathy
> I will have 2 Postfix/Dovecot servers. Each will be configured to use a
> central database and will also use an NFS mount for mail storage. Since
> they will both be configured with central storage, I can use my
> load-balancer to distribute load between both of th
19 matches
Mail list logo
