Hi Wesley,
On 17.03.19 13:44, Czarek wrote:
> Check if you are not an open relay. Configure SPF, DKIM, DMARC
> and Reverse DNS.
Except for DMARC I have all of the above.
> Than contact to the spam lists.
How so?
Best regards,
Johannes
Hey Bill,
On 16.03.19 18:37, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> You MTA is known under different names:
>>>
johannes-bauer.com mail is handled by 10 johannes-bauer.com.
spornkuller.de mail is handled by 10 spornkuller.de.
>>
>> Is this a problem?
>
> It should not be. There are no CNAMEs involved, s
Hi Bastian,
On 16.03.19 11:28, Bastian Blank wrote:
> So your _provider_ is on the the MS blacklist. Netcup did not show up
> on my radar, but I don't know what else.
>
>> Here's what I've checked/tried:
>> * Neither I nor any of my users send spam. The mail volume is VERY low.
>
> It is reall
Hi there,
I know this is a bit off-topic here, but I'm completely desparate right
now and am clueless if there's anything wrong with my MTA configuration
that I completely overlook. I have a Postfix mail server running that
serves multiple domains. All users are fully authenticated and need to
use
Hi list,
I'm having an issue with my Postfix configuration: Currently I've it set
up so that one authentication SASL login (e.g., m...@foo.com) supports
multiple virtual email addresses (e.g., m...@foo.com but also
f...@foo.com, b...@foo.com).
Once authenticated with m...@foo.com, the envelope se
Hello list,
I know this is a bit off-topic, but I'm not sure if I misconfigured
Postfix to result in this: Just today, an email of mine was rejected due
to SPF reasons:
host mx-ha03.web.de[212.227.15.17] said:
550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
550-Reject due to SPF policy.
550-
Am 17.05.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>> On May 16, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>>
>> I have multiple virtual mailboxes, fed from virtual_mailbox_maps.
>> There's one main user and several aliases to that user. Mail needs to be
>> d
Hi list,
I've recently switched around my mail configuration so that Postfix
delivers to dovecot using LMTP over TCP (couldn't get Unix socket to
work unfortunately, sigh). Anyways, here's the scenario:
I have multiple virtual mailboxes, fed from virtual_mailbox_maps.
There's one main user and se
On 31.01.2014 02:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> You're a genius! Thank you so much, this is exactly what I wanted.
>>
>> If we ever meet in person, be sure to claim your well-deserved beer :-)
>
> Instead of buying me a beer, you can pay me back in kind and take
> 5-10 minutes to read Section 1.2
On 31.01.2014 01:41, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:54:01AM +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
>> What I would like to do and cannot figure out: How can I *force*
>> authenticated clients to perform a STARTTLS before performing a "AUTH
>> PLAIN"
Hi list,
I have a Postfix setup with Dovecot SASL. Other MTAs drop their mail at
my host (without authentication obviously) and I have a couple of
clients which drop their relay mail off after authentication. So, a
pretty standard setup.
For SASL authentication I have hashed passwords in the back
11 matches
Mail list logo
