On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger:
>> I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
>> a variety of reasons in postfix.
>>
>> Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
>> tri
I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
a variety of reasons in postfix.
Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
tried varying my MySQL query between using %d and %s as the lookup
key.
The documentation is clear on this when the query is f
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Weinberger
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>>>
&
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> virtual_alias_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_domains.cf
>
> does lists.mylistserver.com match the above lookup?
> postmap -q lists.mylistserver.com m
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger put forth on 1/28/2010 4:18 PM:
>
>> You've made it clear I'm posting the wrong thing - but I don't know
>> what the "right" thing is
>
> Sorry to but in Wietse.
>
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger:
>> > Jeff Weinberger:
>> > > I changed main.cf so the only "relay_domains" entry is:
>> > >
>> > > relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
>> >
>> > Y
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger:
> > I changed main.cf so the only "relay_domains" entry is:
> >
> > relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
>
> You need to verify this with the command
>
> postconf -n
>
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote: > >
Jeff Weinberger: > > > > > > Jeff Weinberger: > > > [ Charset UTF-8
unsupported, converting... ] > > > > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com,
mouss wrote: > > > > > >
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> > > > I am hoping that this
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
> > I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am missing
> >
> > I have a few lists on a mailman server that I run. Until recently, only
> > authenticated users (those
I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am missing
I have a few lists on a mailman server that I run. Until recently, only
authenticated users (those who have actual accounts on my IMAP/Virtual
mailboxes server and can authenticate via SASL). Now I want to allow certain
users w
Mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
> [snip]
>
> This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
> alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a
second map.
>
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
i
ns (it doesn't work if
example.net is an alis for example.org which is in turn an alias of
example.com). but this should be enough in most cases.
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second
map.
Tha
o: or Cc: address (such as list mail).
Really, I am just checking with experts more knowledgeable than I
whether I have chosen a good (or the best) way to achieve this, or if
there is a better way.
Any advice and help are much appreciated!
Thanks,
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinberger
Viktor Wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:26:23 -0500
From: Victor Duchovni
Subject: Re: Question on sendmail submission and master.cf -o
overrides
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:11:16PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
I am hoping someone can offer help in determining this information
about
Hi:
I am hoping someone can offer help in determining this information
about the specifics of how sendmail submits mail.
I have three different services configured in master.cf to accept
mail: 1) the regular smtpd service on port 25, 2) a submission service
for authenticated clients, and
Viktor Wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:01:51PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> jeff_homeip a ?crit :
> > [snip]
> > When I added this back, all worked fine. If I remove this one
restriction
> > (check_sender_access), I can no longer send.
> >
> > is this check_sender_access, because it's not rejectin
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use maildrop as my delivery transport for virtual
mailboxes.
Is there a way to tell
Viktor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:25:38PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
reject_sender_login_mismatch checks the from address against
smtpd_sender_login_maps to be sure that the MAIL FROM address is
owned
by
the SASL-authenticated sender.
But with
Hi:
This question is just a request for information on this...
I currently use reject_sender_login_mismatch in my
smtpd_sender_restrictions as an added precaution against someone sending
undesirable mail.
I see that I can also use reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch, but
I don't underst
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no
authentication is
required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
actually stop an authenticated user from sending
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:45 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
>
>> Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no authentication is
>> required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
>> actually st
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 12:10 AM:
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus
on this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus on
this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail clients.
Once most of them move, I'd like to start warning the ones who don't
that
they shoul
Hi:
Yet another question I hope I can impose upon your help for...
I am testing sender restrictions and have defined an alternate
submission entry in master.cf for this purpose (and not to disrupt
other users while I test).
I want to test the check_sender_access which requires the form
"
On Jan 6, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I then added the line:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/path/to/map
to my main.cf and send a few messages. Postfix correctly allowed and
rejected all of the test messaages, and the logs showed the correct
reason for the rejection
On Tue Jan 6, 2009 2:42 pm Victor Duchovni wrote:
> I know that it is not a good model for the way postfix requires the
> query,
More stronly, an SQL schema in which multiple data items are stored
concatenated in a single table element is a poor schema regardless
of the application. This violat
Hi:
I would very much appreciate any help, advice, pointers, etc. to
resolve an issue I am encountering.
I am having a challenge trying to use a mysql table for
smtpd_sender_login_maps. Right now I have:
In main.cf:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=mysql:/path/to/map.cf
smtpd_sender_restrict
On Jan 2, 2009, at 5:32 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I'm guessing I should leave my port 25 (smtp) entry to allow
submission
on that port with authentication (leaving
"smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated...") - is
there any
harm in that?
no.
On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:03 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
OK, thanks. I will set up dspam to listen on port 10024 - seems to
make
the most sense. I don't need a localhost:10024 entry in master.cf
then?
right?
no, 10024 will be used by dspam. your postfix should h
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with "hosts = 127.0.0.1" (without "localhost")
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the er
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:20 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
content_filter=lmtp:unix:/path/to/dspam args
No.
content_filter=lmtp:inet:127.0.0.1:10024
where the 10024 is the same port used in dspam.conf:
ServerPort10024
of course, dspam must be running in daemon mode
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:17 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe. That mea
Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
>
> > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> >>
> >> I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the
PREPEND
> >&g
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called "dspam" that uses pipe. That means
there's no S/LMTP dialog, just the message itself passed as S
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND
action as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre
On Jan 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've been reading the dspam docs this morning and the project owner
states fairly strongly that sendmail is far preferable to SMTP
re-injection (in the postfix setup docs), but doesn't say why.
if he doesn'
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with "hosts = 127.0.0.1" (without "localhost")
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the err
On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:55 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5
and my
MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5 and
my MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
restarting everything (the whole computer), I started seeing these
message
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:49 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Thank you! That helps clarify what I was missing in this - so clearly
dspam is not passing the envelope sender back to postfix.
I suspect it doesn't know how via SMTP, but it can also use the
sendmail command to do th
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:31 AM, mouss wrote:
jeff_homeip a écrit :
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender}
on the
command line (the script does parse the arguments)
I think the env
mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
>
> I've verified that the "R" flag is there and I use -f ${sender} on
the
> command line (the script does parse the arguments)
>
> I think the envelope-sender is missing before it enters the content
> filter. This from
On Dec 31, 2008, at 6:11 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my
autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to "right" as
pos
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html
to help with my autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as
close to "right" as possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can take
all reasonable measures to ge
Hi:
I am having a problem with duplicate bcc's (from recipient_bcc_maps)
and I suspect I know why - but I hope someone can point me to a
solution.
I have a content filter set up for dspam (content_filter = dspam:dspam
in main.cf) set up as described in the "Advanced content filter
examp
Hi:
I am hoping I can ask for suggestions or pointers to help solve this
challenge.
I am trying to implement an autoreply capability. I am putting
together a script that will handle the messages.
Many of the autoreply examples I've found suggest implementing this by:
main.cf:
always_b
Hi:
I"m using content filtering by using the following (this is the
example) syntax in master.cf:
smtp inet ...other stuff here, do not change... smtpd
-o content_filter=myfilter:myfilter
myfilter unix - n n - 10 pipe
flags..
All is wo
is much appreciated!
--
Jeff Weinberger
http://disruptivemarketing.jeffweinberger.com
51 matches
Mail list logo
