telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
root@zen:~ # telnet mail.servicemouse.com 587
Trying 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe3e:9c37...
Connected to mail.servicemouse.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.servicemouse.com Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready.
Gr.,
Jack
Op 12-01-2025 om 16:01 schreef S
Port 25, 464 and 587 open on your firewall?
Greetings!
Jack Raats
Op 12-01-2025 om 11:29 schreef Gary R. Schmidt via Postfix-users:
On 12/1/25 21:19, Scott K via Postfix-users wrote:
I was told that postfix isn't listening on my mail server at
mail.servicemouse.com
Wietse,
I run the script every five minutes for more than 13 hours to the DNS
server of Cloudflare (2620:fe::fe).
Four times I had some packet drops (about 25%).
I think that cann't explain why postfix is not reachable on ipv6.
Can postscreen drop an ipv6 connection?
Gr.,
Jack
Op 28-04
in.cf mynetworks and inet_interfaces has my ipv4 and ipv6 address.
inet_protocols = all.
In the rest of my configs I'm using my ipv4 address.
What is possible wrong in postfix or is it the connection?
Gr.,
Jack
___
Postfix-users mailing list
Op 24-03-2024 om 20:53 schreef Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 08:39:16PM +0100, Jack Raats via Postfix-users wrote:
master.cf:
smtp .. .. .. .. .. .. smtp
-o inet_protocols=ipv6
What to do if my smtp line ends with postscreen?
That's "
Op 24-03-2024 om 19:42 schreef Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Jack Raats via Postfix-users:
main.cf:
inet_protocols=ipv4,ipv6
as well as appropriate DNS MX and A records.
I have inet_protocols=all
I want to send email via ipv6 only.
master.cf:
smtp .. .. .. .. .. .. smtp
Hi,
Can any help me. I want to recieve email via ipv4 and ipv6. I want to
send email via ipv6 only.
I tried using smtp_address_preference = ipv6, but that didn't work.
Gr.,
Jack Raats
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.o
Oeepppss
You're absolutely right. I am ashamed that I didn't think that DANE was
perhaps the problem
Short term solution was to delete the TLSA record from the DNS.
After deleting the TLSA record the mails are getting in.
Thank you!
Gr.
Jack Raats
Op 23-11-2023 om 05:28 schr
Can anyone help me to address the following problem.
I'm receiving messages from the dovecot and postfix mailinglist. I can get
mail from gmail etc. but not from the freebsd mailing lists.
I get the following in maillog
Nov 23 04:23:43 nl postfix/smtpd[2135]: connect from
mx2.freebsd.org[2610:1c
One of my users (my wife) lost her sent mail folder on her pc. She
asked me if I had a backup of all het sent mail on my mail server, which
I donn't.
I have a backup of all her ingoing mail using procmail, but how can I
make a backup of all her outgoing mail?
Thanks
ing in the config of 3.7.3,1 changed?
Gr.,
Jack
Hi,
I have a postfix server on an ip4 and ipv6 adres.
I'm using clamav-milter for virus scanning. Do I have to use 2 milters,
one for ipv4 and one for ipv6 or can I use only one milter?
Thanks
Jack
Op 04-02-2022 om 21:57 schreef Laura Smith:
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, February 4th, 2022 at 20:48, Jack Raats wrote:
BUT:
How to mail to an ipv4 only server?
Which options do I have?
Gr.,
Jack Raats
That's really a question for your ISP to answer. ;-)
Basi
I have an ipv6 only server running postfix. Mailing to and from an ipv6
server is no problem.
BUT:
How to mail to an ipv4 only server?
Which options do I have?
Gr.,
Jack Raats
bservation about the discoverability of the
info that Wietse gave me. Perhaps a page with info about the hash/DB
table-type (like there is about the LDAP table-type) might help. Or not.
--
Jack.
it must be an FAQ; perhaps the docs should include it? It's
not obvious, at least not to me. Perhaps it's already in the docs, and I
just failed to find it?
Thanks again,
--
Jack.
Mike, I had:
# postconf smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access,
permit_sasl_authenticated
On 14/05/2018 12:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
> jack:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the onl
rictions = check_client_access hash:/path/to/client_access
>
> Quoting jack :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the online documentation for access tables
>> (http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html), it says:
>>
>> Subnetworks are matched by rep
Sorry - I should have said:
Postfix 2.11.3, running on Debian Jessie.
Also, I ran these tests using postmap when it became apparent to me that
postfix itself was not matching address prefixes in hash tables.
On 14/05/2018 11:18, jack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the online documentation f
ed lookup types; is there some
other table type that works properly? Do I need to test them all to see
if they comply with the docs?
Thanks,
--
Jack.
On 19/11/17 05:04 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Nov 19, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
Is there a feature I can use to rewrite the To: header, of "virtual alias
domain" mail, with the result of the following lookup, *after* smtpd_milters are
applied?
SELECT 'b...@ex
On 19/11/17 12:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 19 Nov 2017, at 11:36 (-0500), Jack Bates wrote:
Is there a feature I can use to rewrite the To: header, of "virtual
alias domain" mail, with the result of the following lookup, *after*
smtpd_milters are applied?
SELECT 'b...@ex
Is there a feature I can use to rewrite the To: header, of "virtual
alias domain" mail, with the result of the following lookup, *after*
smtpd_milters are applied?
SELECT 'b...@example.com' FROM my_table WHERE sender = '%s'
Or do I need to use a milter of my own for this?
recipient_canonical_
my postconf –n.
Please help me!!!
Gr.
Jack
address_verify_map = btree:/var/db/postfix/verifymap
address_verify_negative_cache = yes
address_verify_negative_expire_time = 3d
address_verify_negative_refresh_time = 2h
address_verify_poll_count = 3
address_verify_poll_delay = 3s
Noel Jones megan.vbhcs.org> writes:
> This is not something built into postfix.
>
> As an alternative, use SPF and DKIM to detect forged mail claiming
> to be from your own domain.
>
> -- Noel Jones
>
>
Just to clarify is this something that is not built into postfix
with my current use c
[Please ignore my last email as this was sent by mistake before it was
finished]
Hi,
We have an internet facing MX server whereby all users authenticate their
outgoing connection to submit emails via port 587. This MX server routes
incoming mail for our domain to an internal postfix smtp server w
Hi,
We have an internet facing MX server whereby all users authenticate their
outgoing connection to submit emails via port 587. This MX server routes
incoming mail for our domain to an internal postfix smtp server which then
delivers mail to local imap servers.
The internal postfix smtp server u
On 05/05/16 12:50 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:04:09PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
Is there an address rewriting step that affects only virtual_alias_domains?
No.
The following achieved my desired behavior:
virtual_alias_domains = nottheoilrig.com
Is there an address rewriting step that affects only virtual_alias_domains?
I tried the following:
virtual_alias_domains = nottheoilrig.com
virtual_alias_maps = static:nottheoilrig
expecting to deliver all virtual_alias_domains mail to one user,
and I was surprised when ALL mail was deliver
On 26/02/16 08:57 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:16:43AM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
Hmmm ... That is what's happening, but why's there no user context?
I expected the first case ("the rights of the receiving user on whose
behalf the delivery is made")
On 25/02/16 08:20 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Jack Bates :
LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
whose behalf the delivery is made."
So I put "nottheoilrig: /m
LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
whose behalf the delivery is made."
So I put "nottheoilrig: /mnt/nottheoilrig/" in /etc/aliases (alias_maps)
thinking mail for user nottheoilrig would be deliver
-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.example.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id xxx
Cheers,
Jack-Benny
On 08/18/2013 07:41 PM, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
My understanding is that this happens automatically during the
negotiation phase if the remote server advertises
Hello All,
Does anyone know of a reporting tool which allows you to search email
logs and show the results in a web interface?
I see that cpanel has a pretty nice one showing success and failure
along with details of the delivery in a very simple clean interface.
--
Thanks!
Joey
Hello all,
I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
to get messages to them now.
My idea is to on another box create an alias that will f
Hi,
Can anyone give me a manual or guide how to implement dmarc with postfix?
thanks
Grtz.,
Jack
Hello All,
I'm having a problem where I am rejecting messages from one of our servers,
but I'm not clear as to why.
We are using:
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access
We have in helo_access the following:
ourdomain.comREJECT Helo Check helo_access
ourdomain.net
On Wed, February 22, 2012 1:20 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Knowlton:
>> Hi guys.
>> My mailserver uses a relayhost which basically only signs messages with
>> DKIM and delivers them.
>> I would like to add a custom header, something like "X-Abuse: if
>>
Hi guys.
My mailserver uses a relayhost which basically only signs messages with
DKIM and delivers them.
I would like to add a custom header, something like "X-Abuse: if spam/uce
email ab...@mydomain.com".
How should I go about, without postfix adding the header twice (before and
after dkimfilter-o
On Wed, February 15, 2012 6:08 pm, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 2/15/2012 11:57 AM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>> On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>>>> I'm looking into im
On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>> I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table
>> inside a MySQL database. It's basically a list of users that have
>> been bann
Hi guys.
I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table inside a
MySQL database.
It's basically a list of users that have been banned from the system and
for whom I don't want a simple 550 user unknown bounce.
Currently the list is a flat file hash map:
u...@domain.com REJECT Th
On Fri, January 20, 2012 11:24 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jack Knowlton :
>> On Fri, January 20, 2012 11:15 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> > * Jack Knowlton :
>> >> Hi all.
>> >> I'm looking to filter emails that have a specific retur
On Fri, January 20, 2012 11:15 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jack Knowlton :
>> Hi all.
>> I'm looking to filter emails that have a specific return-path address.
> Use check_sender_access
>
Ok, but will it work even though From:<> != Return-Path:<> ?
Al
Hi all.
I'm looking to filter emails that have a specific return-path address.
As far as I understand, the rule's going to be in header_checks..but can I
REJECT or only DISCARD the message?
Also, what should the regex look like? I tried a quick fix yesterday but
it doesn't seem to be working:
#/^R
> Subject: Re: Getting some errors with policyd-spf-perl
>
> Jack:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'm seeing a lot of these errors:
> >
> > 10:07:49 houston postfix/smtpd[9818]: warning: problem talking to
> > server
> > private/policy: Connection t
aster CF Looks like this:
policy unix - n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/perl /usr/local/lib/policyd-spf-perl
main.cf has:
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
Any ideas for me to further dig into?
Thanks!
Jack
From: Noel Jones
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: A Problem No One Has Solved According To Googling
On 10/25/2011 2:06 PM, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
>>Here is my problem
>>
>> Oct 25 10:49:18 mys
Here is a problem that many postfix users have had that has apparently never
been resolved! I appeal to you for your help. I have been googling this for a
very long time now. Here is my problem
Oct 25 10:49:18 myserver postfix/pipe[3712]: 0423257901AB: to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=109318, delays=
though, since you expressed an intention to do spam filtering, I'd
> suggest once you have resolved this problem come back here with a
> postconf -n and ask for some hardening tips. But you can start here:
>
> http://linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
Thanks Simon et.al :)
Jack
I forgot to add:
/etc/postfix/vmailbox includes lines such as:
f...@bar.com bar.com/foo
and I have run these commands:
postmap /etc/postfix/vmailbox
postfix reload
TIA,
Jack
local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
Please advise.
TIA,
Jack
t; postfix config? Where is the user listed?
Now here you can help me directly. Yes, of course it's supposed to be valid.
Where should I list the domain? Where should I list the user?
TIA,
Jack
e Virtual
User Flat Files Postfix was what I needed :)
Jack
From: Noel Jones
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: Down To One Problem?
>> [root@myserver jack]# /usr/sbin/postmap -q f...@bar.com
>> hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
> Why are you running those
From: Noel Jones
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Down To One Problem?
So I ran these commands:
[root@myserver jack]# /usr/sbin/postmap /etc/postfix/virtual
postmap: warning: removing zero-length database file
er=spamfilter argv=/usr/local/bin/spamfilter -f ${sender} --
${recipient}
TIA,
Jack
From: john
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Down To One Problem?
Yes, this *should* be over on the dovecot list, *however* nobody there has
responded all weekend long and my client has vowed to drop my service tom
you
want to read all my configs, etc, please go here:
http://angrynates.com/postfix.txt
TIA,
Jack
for bed ;) The
"status=deferred (temporary failure... is frustrating but that's obviously a
dovecot issue.
TIA,
Jack
> perhaps look
> http://www.howtoforge.com/ubuntu-postfix-saslauthd-sasl-authentication-failure-cannot-connect-to-saslauthd-server-permission-denied
Been through a bunch of them before emailing the list.
> Add the postfix user to the sasl group (this makes sure that Postfix has
> the perm
lease
advise.
TIA,
Jack
From: Reindl Harald
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: First Insallation, Bouncing Emails
I am still getting the following errors:
Oct 22 07:26:28 13gems dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (tried to use disabled
p
the right syntax to use near '??awakelunch.info??? AND active = 1' at
>> line 1
> Check those
That error appears to come from a file called
/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf that has this line:
SELECT goto FROM alias WHERE address = ‘%s’ AND active = 1
Therefore, the address has question marks in it. Looks like a hacker, no?
TIA,
Jack
ponds to your
MySQL server version f
or the right syntax to use near '??awakelunch.info??? AND active = 1' at line 1
The TLS problem isn't mission-critical since it's just getting disabled, but
the mysql problem is critical. Maybe the sasl or pam_mysql is screwed up? How
che
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Peter Evans
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:23 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Blacklists for you MTA
>
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Marek Salwerowicz
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
>> What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
>> any/all clients?
>
> That sounds very wrong. What problem are you trying to solve?
I want to control
What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
any/all clients?
Geoff,
Use a mailinglist manager for delivering instead of a large alias.
Minimalist is small and easy to use..
Grtz.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Geoffrey R Hardin
To: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:39 PM
Subject: Postfix mail transport
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Bates:
>> I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
>> or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
>> mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
>
> The LMTP pr
I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
Is it possible to configure Postfix to deliver to this LMTP server?
All my efforts have resulted in envelope recipients with a domai
Hello All,
I am seeing more of these rejections, but can't put my finger on it.
#554 Message refused ##
I am finding reference to mcaffee issues, but not anything to help me figure
out why a sending address that is not blacklisted is getting this message (
content is OK )
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:53 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Error 550
> Am 23.06.2011 19:48, schrieb Jack:
>
Hello All,
I searched the all knowing google but wasn't able to find what this 555
really means. Can someone please tell me what this means and if there is
something I can do on my side or if it's only on the receivers side.
Jun 13 12:51:48 pluto postfix/smtp[6897]: D83CF364024:
to=,
relay
>
> For you: http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
> For the OP: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>
> In general, don't rush answer a question unless you definitely know the
> answer.
>
> This particular OP is getting no informed answers, because he does not
know
> how to ask
How can I tell whats running in cleanup, I really don't see a lot of entries
in maillog and have no idea why I'm getting 50 or 60 cleanup processes
running at once and bringing CPU very high.
Thanks!
J
o like 110.
Is it that we are filtering those messages?
I do have the IP's from all of our servers in the mynetworks config of the
main.cf.
Is there anything I can do to process that a little quicker and not choke
the box to death?
Thanks!
Thanks!
Jack
icate as a client to anothe SMTP server.
Thanks for your time
Jack Raats
adding a mailbox and then a comma separating the copied email address?
Thanks!
Jack
> -Original Message-
> > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:45 PM
> > To: Postfix users
> > Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
> >
n.
I have verified the path to /usr/libexec/postfix/policyd-spf-perl and have
the below in my master.cf
#-< SPF Policy - Jack
>---
policy unix - n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/per
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:45 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
>
> Jack:
> > I see th
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> To: Jack
> Cc: Postfix
> Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
>
> Jack:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'm finding this entry a
erver having an error or mine?
Thanks!
Jack
Understand that address rewriting is at the heart of Postfix - but I
struggle to configure Postfix to deliver messages which are sent to the
domain @nottheoilrig.com, to localhost via LMTP, with envelope recipient
"nottheoilrig"
Using transport_maps or various related parameters, I can deliver
@no
Hi,
Den 01. jan. 2011 22:14, skrev Jack Raats:
Reposting, because it looks like it didn't reached the mailinglist.
It did.
I'm sorry. Excuse me!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f
|
postqueue -i queu
s for your time!
Jack Raats
Hi eryone,
Happy new year!
What's wrong with postqueue -f?
Jan 1 06:18:00 orac postfix/postqueue[71142]: fatal: usage: postqueue -f
| postqueue -i queueid | postqueue -p | postqueue -s site
postqueue -f also doesn't flush the queue.
grtz.
Jack
_code = 550
unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550
unverified_sender_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/postfix/tables/virtual_alias_domains
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/postfix/tables/virtual_alias_maps
orac#
Thanks for your time!
Jack Raats
How can a Postfix "content filter" tell whether the upstream client
authenticated or not?
I'm working on a content filter which should behave differently,
depending on whether the upstream client authenticated to Postfix or not
NS of messages regularly
from these CIDR's and it does make a big difference in the spam level.
Good Luck
Jack
- n - - discard
#tlsmgrunix - - n 1000? 1 tlsmgr
#
#
Did I potentially comment out to much?
Thanks!
Jack
message header
Thanks!
Jack Raats
r messages with one RCPT, but to handle messages with multiple
RCPT, I need to transform it to multiple messages, so they can each have
different return addresses
Is there a better forum for discussing milter development?
Thanks! Jack
now -- my relay_recipient_maps parameter points to pfknown_users which has
the form:
ttt OK
do i have to have ...@arlut.utexas.edu OK ? because i've seen one piece
of email get delivered today. is it possible my present format will work
sometimes but not others? and the u...@... form fix
Hi Jack!
> If I am blocking 194.149.65.0/23 this is a standard format, it tells
> us that the IP's are the 194.149.65.0-255 and 194.149.66.0-255.
This is where you've got it wrong, it means 94.149.64.0-255 and
94.149.65.0-255. If you need 65 and 66 you will need to specify two /
> I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't
> like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list.
The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any non-zero
bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23 below).
I.e. those CIDR entries are inconsiste
Hello All,
I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like
certain IP blocks in my CIDR list.
I'm wondering if it doesn't like the 4th octet of the IP's being a zero.
Any help appreciated!
Here is a small piece of the log file:
-[MsgHour:1326.32]
Hello All,
I want to confirm that what I want to try wont break anything. I want to
use a CIDR list and reject messages.
That I can tell I need to do this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/usr/local/etc/postfix/maps/ip.cidr,
permit
But I don't want to conflic
rbl_client psbl.surriel.com,
reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net,
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
Thanks!
Jack
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
