Oscar m Cruz wrote:
F003D25C001 2057 Fri Aug 21 16:10:58 u...@domain.com
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451-4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08510-11,
virus_scan FAILED: virus_scan: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED: ClamAV-clamd
av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x816e564) Too many retries to talk to
127.0.0
Peter Macko wrote:
How can I forward emails to a specific mailserver ip address?
I do not want postfix to make DNS lookup for actual mailserver ip address.
I am using /etc/aliases
u...@domain1.com: u...@domain2.com
I would like to specify mailserver's ip address for "@domain2.com" in some
conf
Ville Walveranta wrote:
It works except that the Postfix refresh message
("postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system") is
displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any
idea how I could hide it?
It's probably writing to stderr,
postfix reload 2>/dev/null
Stuart Matthews wrote:
I have already tried editing /usr/local/etc/postfix/access, adding:
eff.orgREJECTyou can't send mail as me!
And of course I ran postmap after this. I have also tried using the
setting that rejects mail that says HELO eff.org.
You say check_sender_access didn't
my problem is, when i log in, i can't see the mail. the new mail files are
being created in /home/username/Maildir/new but... mail clients can't see
it.
This is a configuration issue with your pop3/imap service. You'll need
to configure it to support maildir and probably tell it where to look
Is it possible to avoid recipient_bcc_maps picking up aliases in the
virtual_alias_maps table?
I have a pcre recipient_bcc_map entry that catches an entire domain and
forwards it in such a way that the transports table hands it to my
archivemail transport:
# cat recipient_bcc
/(.*)@judelawfi
ghe wrote:
Oh, dear! I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do about this, but
thanks to you all for the response(s). Maybe a non-caching name server
might help.
I don't think there's anything you can do about it. The settings for how
long a cached record stays alive and when an update is atte
Yes it does:
# host adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net
adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net has address 99.29.103.142
SBC Global's ns1.swbell.net does answer with the appropriate IP address,
but neither our companies name servers or my local dns on my home
network can resolve
mouss wrote:
I am trying to "collect" methods to setup postfix in an HA
configuration, for "outbound" relay (no MUA involved). a use case is
using multiple postfix boxes to relay mail out for one or more exchange
servers. there are many possibilities. which one is
"good/recommended/easy/blahblah"
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna
wrote:
> Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
> That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
> example.net goes to gateway 2?
I may have goofed, I'm not sure what I suggested i
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna
wrote:
> Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
> That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
> example.net goes to gateway 2?
>
Have a look at:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf
What is "my_custom_transport.example.com" ? A subdomain?
Yes. In addition, this list uses example.com as a basis quite frequently.
You didn't provide your own domain, so J.P. used this as an example.
As a side note, it doesn't have to be a real sub-domain. When the mail
is handed off to p
George wrote:
I have postfix with postfixadmin and everything stored in a mysql database.
How do I forward emails sent to a mail account to an external command?
Since you are using virtual aliases (postfixadmin w/mysql assumes so)
you'll need to setup a pipe transport in master.cf and proper
Paul wrote:
That will only list the files which are installed, but it also configures
FreeBSD to use it as it's MTA, that will not be uninstalled by just
removing to files I guess.
That should be easy to deal with. These settings are changed in a file
called mailer.conf.
Here's the documenta
Jorey Bump wrote:
Put it back. smtpd_enforce_tls is deprecated since Postfix 2.3 and
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
I'll research the smtpd_tls_security_level option further. It didn't
present a problem until I started working on this specific feature with
the white lists.
LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:08, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
Why?
I didn't explicitly add it. It was a left over from the default
master.cf for the postfix package on debian 5.0. It&#
I'm trying to implement a white list with check_sender_access in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. The problem I'm running into is that the
submission port is requiring TLS even when I have set
smtpd_enforce_tls=no and smtp_enfoce_tls=no in main.cf and specified
them as options for the submission e
jeff donovan wrote:
# reject_ndn
<> REJECT please don't send notices to forged sender
-- Noel Jones
Greetings,
I have added the data restrictions, the restrictions class, and the
sender restrictions. is there an error number or something I can grep
in my logs to check how these new res
Some of Comcast's MX servers (mx1.comcast.net, mx2.comcast.net are the
ones I've verified so far) appear to be handing out test SSL
certificates, at least that's the best guess I can make from the
research I've done so far. I reserve the right to be absolutely wrong.
I've been battling over th
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
What do you get with:
grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog
Terry,
Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE:
client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7]
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE:
message-id=<88b
,janaina,daniele.henriques,ritadecassia,danielehenriques,ritafreitas,mariangela,julianaprezia,rosangelacremaschi,adrianacoan,affonsoneto
,mariangela,super
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Gabriel.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, J.P. Trosclair
wrote:
Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
When
Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
When somebody sends an email to that alias, all users from my organization
keep receiving this message 10, 20, 30, 40 times, 40 times the same message
that was sended only once.
Relevant log entries and a copy of the alias would also help while
trying to figure out what'
I've got a couple of questions about using maildir on top of nfs in a HA
setup.
1. What are the chances of duplicate file names when running multiple
instances of postfix delivering in maildir format to the same location?
2. "That said, Postfix will in many cases work very well on NFS, becaus
I found this old thread suggesting that postfix doesn't allow null
local-part addresses but it doesn't say which version this policy went
into effect:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-08/0445.html
I'm using postfix 2.4.5 and experiencing this problem. From what I can
tell t
William Kisman wrote:
What are the possibilities that the spammer could use my mail server to
spam ?
First check if your server is an open relay using this service:
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
Also if you think that a sasl user/pass has been compromised, change the
password. You can look
Linux Addict wrote:
Hello, I have clients sending mails to an non-existent email
address/domain, emailerm...@exchange.example.net. I want to discard any
mail sent to this address. I looked at smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but
cant figure out how to get this done. Please help me!!
~LA
Haven'
sean darcy wrote:
"postmap the transports file"?
as in
postmap /etc/postfix/transports ??
Yes
and reload postfix's configuration.
service postfix restart ??
Sure, or 'postfix reload', unless stated otherwise.
How do I set up postfix to provide SASL authentication
sean darcy wrote:
I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them
to pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes -
one on 1and1.com, the other on gmail.
My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587
( which is how I've
Bailo, John wrote:
Is Postfix available for or part of Sun's Solaris 10 OS as a compiled
package?
Check blastwave and sun freeware, afaik there is no official release
from sun. There are some guides on building SMF scripts for postfix on
solaris 10.
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
So I setup a filter for stripping the attachments. I want to route
mail based on [EMAIL PROTECTED] through this filter before it is passed
on to domain's MX address. I think it's possible by using
transport_maps and some tricks in master.cf, at least thats
On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:31 PM, MacShane, Tracy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.P. Trosclair
Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2008 10:32 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: mail forward based on user to specific filter then
to
Hi,
I've got a user that wants their mail forwarded to their blackberry
account. No big deal. The catch is they want attachments stripped first.
I've found this tool called renattach that does just that. I set this up
in main.cf:
renattach unix- n n - -
Tolga wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I
don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this is a
Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Re
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am
wondering if this is a Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
mto
Sounds like a postfix configuration issue. Are you using mutt on the
same se
Miguel Angel Cañedo wrote:
Hi I have set up my postfix server:
Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
they get 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected. Access denied.
This is driving me nuts, any help will be grat, thanks in
Christian Desrochers wrote:
Hi all,
We have a spam problem. We get a lot of emails, where the sender (MAIL FROM)
address is equal to the receiver (RCPT TO) address. When I look at the
"Received:" header field, the IP address of the server it's coming from, is
not our mail server.
I would like
Greg Coates wrote:
OK. My IP is 64.22.79.211
Greg
I see no obvious problems with your DNS. I also have no problem
connecting to sbcmx3.prodigy.net (from your logs) on port 25 from our
network. Here the host resolves to the same IP address as listed in your
logs as well. It may be time to
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is to intentionally
deceive the recipient. Is there
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
DJ Lucas escribió:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C222318376
f
For the past couple of weeks we've been getting a lot of spam from valid
mail accounts on our domain. The spam gets automatically white listed
since it's from our domain. Short of removing our own domain from our
white lists, I'm looking for a way to put an end to this. Our server
already requi
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Is there a way to put postfix in state so that it stops accepting mail
so that I can clear the queue of all undelivered mail?
Rundown of what and why:
We are a small company, we have two mail servers (mail1, mail2). Mail1
is our primary server
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Is there a way to put postfix in state so that it stops accepting mail
so that I can clear the queue of all undelivered mail?
Rundown of what and why:
We are a small company, we have two mail servers (mail1, mail2). Mail1
is our primary server, mail2 pretty much just
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
To stop receiving mail from the network, comment out the network
facing smtpd entry in master.cf, do "postfix reload", and look
for warnings in the maillog file.
You can get a lot fancier and set up an access rule that replies
with "421 Service
Is there a way to put postfix in state so that it stops accepting mail
so that I can clear the queue of all undelivered mail?
Rundown of what and why:
We are a small company, we have two mail servers (mail1, mail2). Mail1
is our primary server, mail2 pretty much just sits there to be used for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have postifx and i want to save email that are send. If this is possible i
want to save not email of all users but only of some users.
How can i make?
Vuoi essere presente online?
Vuoi d
Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 5:29:59 PM, Jim Balo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using Postfix w/ Amavis-new, Pyzor, DCC and Clam.
> I have trained the Bayesian Classifier with over 2,000 ham and 2,000
> spam, but I am still getting quite a bit of spam.
>
> I am about to
Postfix's proxmap is segfaulting or at least that's what I think the signal
11 means. Some background info first: This is a fedora mail server (core 6)
that I've upgraded to postfix 2.5.4. I used the rpm spec file from the last
release of postfix on fc6 to build a rpm to upgrade with and also to
We use something similar. We are a small company so what suits us may
not be usable for you, either way I'll give you the run down so you can
decide. We use an alias to forward mail to the regular mail box that is
accessed via imap/pop and then to a custom program that stores the mail
in mbox f
have MX records.), to just put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option to
setup a MX record for dynamic host names. Y
cCarthy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option to
setup a MX record for dynamic host names. You'll more than likel
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option
to setup a MX record for dynamic host names. You'll more than likely
want to enable this unless you have a reason not to.
Basic setup for accepting and sending mail with your ddns hostname:
mydomain = mymachine.no-ip.org
m
Hi, this is my first post on the list so if I do something out of the
ordinary please forgive me.
The reason your mail is working locally is probably because postfix is
configured to accept mail from the local network or localhost without
any sort of authentication but not when the mail is com
53 matches
Mail list logo
