Hello Michael,
On 02/03/2014 02:41 PM, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
> 3 feb 2014 г. 17:08:31 GMT+04:00, IMAP List Administration
> wrote:
> >
> >Indeed, the problem was being caused by bug(s) in the OpenBSD
> >implementation of
> >gethostbyaddr().
>
> Care to gi
[resending to list, where I meant to send it...]
Hi Wietse,
On 01/31/2014 04:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> IMAP List Administration:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4,
>> and
>> at the same time w
Hello List,
a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4, and
at the same time went from postfix-2.9.6 to postfix-2.11.20130710.
postfix-2.11.20130710 is the OpenBSD 5.4 default package, in case someone is
wondering "why that?".
I've been using "reject_unknown_client
2012 at 09:55:11PM +0100,
>IMAP List Administration wrote:
>> I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on
> That's a pre-release snapshot. Postfix 2.9 is up to patchlevel 4.
so now I have a release version of postfix.
> That's very old. 9.4.3 was
On 11/14/2012 11:06 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> I've been getting client requests from this ip as well, i've put it into a
> permenant spamd(8) blacklist.
that's highly interesting, but:
1) the sender was legitimate
2) my problem is some sort of intermittent DNS lookup failure
3) that addre
Hello Folks,
I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on OpenBSD v5.1. We
have a number of anti-UCE postfix measures in place, including
"reject_unknown_client_hostname", which we quite like. It's hard to believe
there are so many spammers that can't overcome such a low obstacle.
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0 on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most of the unix-users
have mail delivered to an identical cyrus-user, but for a few "local" transport
should be used.
What is the best way to ar
