RE: postfix architecture[SOLVED]

2009-12-22 Thread Houssam El Hallak
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:41:28 -0600 > From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: postfix architecture > > On 12/21/2009 10:18 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:56 -0600 > &

RE: postfix architecture

2009-12-21 Thread Houssam El Hallak
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:45:56 -0600 > From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: postfix architecture > > On 12/21/2009 9:14 AM, Houssam El Hallak wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > thak you for your answer > >

RE: postfix architecture

2009-12-21 Thread Houssam El Hallak
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org From: mart...@youngguns.nl Subject: Re: postfix architecture Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:54:38 +0100 To: linuxfra...@hotmail.com On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Houssam El Hallak wrote: Hello this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post

postfix architecture

2009-12-20 Thread Houssam El Hallak
Hello this is my first post here , so If any mistake with this post please let me know . question 1 : is this a good postfix architecture ?? I have 2 postfix Servers : DMZ_postfix which has basic protection (192.168.0.1). and forward emails to LAN_postfixLAN_postfix which has t