> On January 7, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> I found smtpd_service_name, and guessing I could use that to
>> replace the part after '/'? Would changing that have any
>> functional impact, or only the logs?
> Yes, it would break tools like "collate" that you might
Hi,
I just tried adding '-o syslog_name=postfix/submission' to master.cf
for my submission port, as I would like to be able to distinguish log
lines for the two smtpd ports. I had expected it to completely
replace 'postfix/smtpd' at the beginning of the log line, but now see
it only replaces 'p
>>>>> On January 2, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-01-02 at 16:47:00 UTC-0500 (Thu, 02 Jan 2025 16:47:00 -0500)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users is rumored to
> have said:
>>>>>>> On January 2, 202
>>>>> On January 2, 2025 Bill Cole via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On 2025-01-01 at 20:13:35 UTC-0500 (Wed, 01 Jan 2025 20:13:35 -0500)
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users is rumored to
> have said:
>> I just noticed a single unknown host is c
>>>>> On January 1, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 08:13:35PM -0500, Greg Klanderman via
> Postfix-users wrote:
>> I'm fine with allowing a little probing, especially if the host
>> doing so has
>>>>> On January 1, 2025 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
>>>>> wrote:
> Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users:
>>
>> Hello all and Happy New Year!
>>
>> Is there some documentation for the list of tags, their meanings,
>> and the format
> On January 1, 2025 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> As the operator of a "responsible" SMTP survey engine:
> https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/about.html
> https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/
> that connects just a few times a day (once per IP address of an MX
> host, wi
Hello all and Happy New Year!
Is there some documentation for the list of tags, their meanings, and
the format for the value after '=' for the 'disconnect from' log
lines?
For example:
| disconnect from X[IP] ehlo=1 auth=0/1 rset=1 quit=1 commands=3/4
I believe auth=0/1 indicates that aut
xp
> package installed?" instead of "unsupported map type for this
> operation". This happened with all non-dynamic map types (static,
> cidr, etc.) that have no 'bulk create' support. Problem reported
> by Greg Klanderman.
Thank you Wietse!
Greg
>>>>> On April 10, 2022 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 02:27:33PM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> Quick question, what is the correct syntax to match an empty sender in
>> a hash: sender access map (i.e. check_sender_access)?
> This is natur
>>>>> On April 13, 2022 Matus UHLAR <- fantomas > wrote:
>>>>>>> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
>>> text
&g
> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
> wrote:
> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
> text
> format ios what Postfix uses for those types.
Thank you Bill! Knowing that now, I see where postmap(1) states:
| The postmap(1) command can query any support
Hi all,
Quick question, what is the correct syntax to match an empty sender in
a hash: sender access map (i.e. check_sender_access)?
Somewhat related, if I have a regexp: map (header checks), like so:
/^Subject:.*foo bar/ REJECT
/^Subject:.*foo baz/ REJECT
when it is postmap'd, it warns about
> On August 21, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> * if smtpd_relay_restrictions has been set (not defaulted) evaluate it
>> first
> I mentioned this to Wietse recently. My instinct is to go with the
> last option.
Viktor, great! Thank you for the update..
Greg
> On August 14, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> This is of those rare cases where the documentation is now in error. In
> order to improve backwards compatibility with postfix prior to 2.10, the
> order of evaluation was changed in postfix-3.3-20180106 to evaluate the
> recipient restrictions
>>>>> On August 14, 2020 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 05:41:38PM -0400, Greg Klanderman wrote:
>> smtpd_relay_restrictions is documented as being checked before
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
> This is of those rare cases where the d
Hi,
First thank you for all the work you do/have done on Postfix!
I have been using Postfix for 15+ years to handle mail for a handful
of my domains. I upgraded my mail server from Debian 8 to 10 a couple
months ago, and was running 3.4.10-0+deb10u1 as of the time I last saw
the issue below.
17 matches
Mail list logo
