> but accept() blocked indefinitely. This would then be a kernel issue.
Does this look like that?
Thanks
Gaute
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:26:10PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > On Monday 02 February 2009 15:43:19 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:50:30PM
On Monday 02 February 2009 17:45:15 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >
> > Apparently nothing in particular:
> >
> > http://pastebin.ca/1325397
>
> Jan 25 00:56:53 hotell01 postfix/qmgr[738]: B75CA147967:
> from=, size=29074, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>
> The delivery agent scheduled to handle this
On Monday 02 February 2009 15:43:19 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:50:30PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > Jan 25 05:59:19 hotell01 postfix/smtp[595]: fatal: watchdog timeout
> > Jan 25 05:59:20 hotell01 postfix/master[734]: warning: process
> > /usr/lib
have been obvious what to research,
but only 1. does.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks
Gaute Amundsen
Jan 25 02:41:36 hotell01 postfix/smtpd[14945]: disconnect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Jan 25 03:31:01 hotell01 postfix/pickup[10767]: 76DC914764B: uid=0 from=
Jan 25 03:31:01 hotell01 postfix/cl
On Thursday 11 December 2008 21:38:58 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:34:31PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > How about this?
> > Even more off topic!
> >
> > But so far this seems to work for me.
> > Kmail "could not write lockf
How about this?
Even more off topic!
But so far this seems to work for me.
Kmail "could not write lockfile" when reading the mbox, but "FCNTL" worked,
whatever that means :)
Considerable room for improvement I'm sure, but in principle?
Suggestions welcome :)
Gaute
/usr/bin/sendmail:
#!/usr/bi
On Thursday 11 December 2008 17:21:54 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask,
> > and an hour of googling turned up little.
> >
> > The questi
On Thursday 11 December 2008 17:22:35 Jorey Bump wrote:
> Gaute Amundsen wrote, at 12/11/2008 07:25 AM:
> > Slightly OT this, but I can't think on any other obvious place to ask,
> > and an hour of googling turned up little.
> >
> > The question:
> > What a
, but I want to avoid the overhead of running and
maintaining a full mailserver.
I have a sneaky feeling that I am somehow not seeing the forest for all the
trees, or my assumptions are wrong, but I can't put my finger on it..
Regards
Gaute Amundsen
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 23:00:39 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Gaute Amundsen:
> > On Wednesday 15 October 2008 14:03:06 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Gaute Amundsen:
> >
> Postfix looks at the first input line. There currently is no
> way to override this, so your be
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 22:48:14 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:27:29PM +0200, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 October 2008 14:03:06 Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > >Specifically, Postfix accepts local submissions in UNIX format
>
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 14:03:06 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Gaute Amundsen:
> > The issue as I understand it :
> > Postfix expects EOL to be LF when picking up mail from sendmail on unix
> > and replaces that with CRLF when sending. When it gets CRLF it still
> >
handle this.
Please, can anyone here give me a definitive answer?
Regards
Gaute Amundsen
13 matches
Mail list logo
