On 13 Dec 2010, at 14:29, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:24:03PM +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Is there maybe an even more simple approach to this using standard
>> postfix functionality? The distribution lists are very static and do
>> not require adjustments very often.
>
On 19 Mar 2010, at 15:53, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well.
> Thanks Victoriano and Martin.
I have quite easily integrate mlmmj with Postfix, it's rather nice one you get
setup. No fiddly web interfaces to worry about, it's all handl
On 17 Feb 2010, at 11:59, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Is it safe to put the external IP of my backup MX in mynetworks?
Provided your backup MX has the same SMTP relay restrictions as the master MX
you should be OK. I replicate our master config out to the secondaries but I
have the master confi
On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:23, richard lucassen wrote:
> Thnx to everyone. I think mailman and mlmmj are good suggestions. I'll
> examine all of these and I'll choose the one that fits best to this
> rather particular purpose.
Mailman is a python app, mlmmj is a native C app that works through a loca
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:53, Jerry wrote:
> Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl
> and has a web interface for most common configuration settings.
> Obviously, it can be configured manually. In fact, some settings are
> not exposed in the web interface. Plus, it works
On 4 Jan 2010, at 13:43, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to
> setup and run.
I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web interface like
mailman and works great with Postfix.
Gaby.
--
Expounding the theory of infinit
On 12 Nov 2009, at 14:14, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Gaby Vanhegan :
Is there a portable way to share postmapped file across machines?
Yes:
1) share the text files, then use a Makefile to convert them on the
target systems
I already do this, I wanted to take this step out.
2) Use
On 12 Nov 2009, at 14:17, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
I get the same error if I try to read the contents of the .db file
using postmap directly. Is there going to be some architectural
difference between the two systems? Is there a more cross-platform
file format I could use for the datab
Is there a portable way to share postmapped file across machines?
I have one postfix server running OpenBSD and another running CentOS,
I want the CentOS server to provide secondary services for for the BSD
box. The OpenBSD box uses virtual delivery:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:(BSD box)
...
# Wh
On 17 Jul 2009, at 16:29, Michel Lavondes wrote:
On Thu, July 16, 2009 7:23 pm, Mike Cappella wrote:
On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name
changes,
all the
On 17 Jul 2009, at 15:02, Wietse Venema wrote:
Good names I have seen sofar that suggest what the program does:
sentry (the guard at the gate) and triage (the action of deciding
which patients to service).
St Peter?
--
Being drunk is feeling sophisticated without being able to say it.
http:
On 17 Jul 2009, at 13:50, Noel Jones wrote:
I like sentry too.
Along that theme: doorman? bouncer? examiner? customs? patrol?
G.
--
Expounding the theory of infinite Abelian Badgers
http://playr.co.uk/
On 19 Jun 2009, at 16:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jaroslaw Grzabel:
How do you imagine to create 45k users with 10-15k domains ? It's
faster
to create access lists/maps and filter everything. Creating something
like openrelay server but with stricts ACL. To defend I'm asking
simply
just only
On 10 Mar 2009, at 13:24, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Do not include virtual_alias_maps in local_recipient_maps.
virtual_alias_maps are checked globally for all Address Classes.
For more on Address Classes, see
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
That makes sense. I'm not
Is this sane or is it going to cause problems?
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
...
# Valid local users only exist in these locations
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
$virtual_alias_maps
...
# What are the domains that we handle mail for?
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postf
On 15 Aug 2008, at 14:18, Wietse Venema wrote:
The pickup daemon is supposed to be running all the time, and it
is supposed to react immediately. For debugging, see the "-v" option
in the master(5) manual page.
I'll turn that on, see what comes out in the logfile.
If you submit mail as a no
Hi,
Thanks for such a swift response Wietse!
On 15 Aug 2008, at 13:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
Gaby Vanhegan:
Aug 15 12:22:27 dn postfix/smtpd[13962]: >
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]: 354 End data with .
Aug 15 12:22:36 dn postfix/smtpd[13962]: public/cleanup socket:
wanted
attrib
I'm trying to find out the source of a delay in postfix processing
some mail. I have a web app that sends a notification email to users
but there is a delay when PHP calls the mail() function. I remove the
call to mail() and the delay goes away. I turned on debuggering_peer
for localhost
18 matches
Mail list logo
