On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Danilo G. Baio:
> > 2018-07-02 15:11:06 8052 [Warning] Aborted connection 8733691 to db:
> > 'my_database' user: 'my_user' host: 'localhost' (Got an error reading
> > communicat
CentOS:
postfix-2.6.6-8.el6.x86_64
mysql-community-server-5.6.38-2.el6.x86_64
Anyone knows why this happens?
Regards.
--
Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)
Sorry i ve found the problem, i putted domain to be sent in "mydestination"
Thx.
Le 25/05/2018 à 13:00, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> pat G:
>> Ok it is better now than yesterday, it can receive requests.
>> However, when one of our internal mails server send a messa
, but like if he wanted to send message in local
mailbox...
Did i miss something for that it send in external domains/server ?
Thanks,
Le 24/05/2018 à 16:22, Dominic Raferd a écrit :
> On 24 May 2018 at 15:01, pat G wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i am working on a relay server
Hello,
i am working on a relay server, but it isn't functionnal.
my main.cf is :
http://paste.debian.net/1026390/
but i ve theses errors in logs :
http://paste.debian.net/1026400/
did i miss something or did i do something wrong ?
Thanks,
Patrice G
On 01/30/2018 06:21 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.01.18 08:55, Asai wrote:
I'm running into an issue with a mailbox that also has aliases
assigned to it.
please avoid HTML mail.
e.g. u...@domain.net has alias u...@domain.net,
us...@otherdomain.net, and us...@otherdomain.net
What's
On 01/29/2018 11:09 PM, jin&hitman&Barracuda wrote:
Hi
We are tring to move our mx server to another isp.
You have two postfix installations then, one in your current MX record
and a new
which is not yet published on DNS . Is that correct ?
They gave us an IP address but there is some stran
On 01/28/2018 12:04 PM, Karol Augustin wrote:
On 2018-01-28 9:25, CP wrote:
on 01/27/2018 09:30 PM, Karol Augustin wrote:
With Message-ID header and dovecot lmtp (I think lda works also) you
eliminate (a lot!!) of these duplicates so try it if you have the same
problem.
In my case I have a robo
hello,
i use postfix since years, there was no problem, but since some weeks,
we receive mails from bad domains.
i don' t find solution in postfix. i use "sender_access" to reject some
domains, but domains are always coming even if i postmap sender_access
and i restart postfix. what can be the so
>> Thank you for your hints and sorry for the late followup. busy and stuff.
>> thank you for your suggestions, I was aware of the csr-option but wanted
>> to avoid this, since it does not well automate with certbot.
>
> Sine "--csr" is a certbot option I am surprised to hear you say that
> "it do
>
>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:02 PM, G. Schlisio wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if it is possible to have one cert per port postfix is serving
>> on, eg one for 25 and one for 587.
>
> Yes.
>
>master.cf:
> submission inet ... smtpd
>-o smtpd
Hi all,
I wonder if it is possible to have one cert per port postfix is serving
on, eg one for 25 and one for 587.
Background of this:
for user interaction (mainly on port 587) I would like to use my signed
letsencrypt cert which changes fairly often.
For interaction of servers I would like to us
> I managed to find where this is happening. It is not in glibc but in
> systemd.
>
> If your /etc/nsswitch.conf has something like this:
>
> passwd: compat mymachines systemd
>
> then the routines that are being used are systemd ones.
>
> The checks being done are here in the function vali
>
> I tried that on archlinux. The above program still produces EINVAL for
> login names between 32 and 255 inclusive.
>
> _SC_LOGIN_NAME_MAX is 256 on that platform.
>
> John
>
hi,
earlier i tried with literal "AA", which was probably not what you
meant.
it produced a "not found".
using
> Georg
>
> I don't think there is enough evidence at the moment to say with
> certainty that any change in glibc has introduced the problem, since you
> were using that for a while now without seeing issues.
>
> I'd still be interested in knowing what output the test program gives on
> the affec
Am 24.12.2016 um 08:40 schrieb John Fawcett:
> On 12/24/2016 01:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> John Fawcett:
> "On success, *getpwnam_r*() and *getpwuid_r*() return zero, and set
> /*result/ to /pwd/. If no matching password record was found, these
> functions return 0 and store NULL
> Georg
>
> Replying to my own post: on re-reading the specification, it looks clear
>
> "On success, *getpwnam_r*() and *getpwuid_r*() return zero, and set
> /*result/ to /pwd/. If no matching password record was found, these
> functions return 0 and store NULL in /*result/. In case of error, an
> It was worth checking the obvious to exclude it.
>
> I suspect that one of the system libraries used by the .forward
> mechanism has been impacted by your upgrade.
>
> If you don't need to use .forward files you might try setting
>
> forward_path =
>
> in main.cf and restart postfix. If that
Am 23.12.2016 um 15:11 schrieb John Fawcett:
> On 12/23/2016 01:56 PM, G. Schlisio wrote:
>>> Couldn't find the postconf -n output at that link
>> sorry, correct link for postconf -n: http://termbin.com/w509
>
> It doesn't look like "local" is even att
> Couldn't find the postconf -n output at that link
sorry, correct link for postconf -n: http://termbin.com/w509
> Hi Georg
>
> for reporting problems you can refer to
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail if you have not already
> seen it.
>
> For the configuration, command output from *
> *
>
> *postconf -n*
>
> *postconf -Mf*
>
> is a good starting point. Most people post it to the list, bu
>
> Georg
>
> probably the best thing is to compare your previous configuration to the
> new one and see what changed.
>
> For help with your current configuration, you should post it.
>
> John
hi john,
thank you for your suggestion. as i tried to indicate with "no changes
in mail config" th
Dear list,
We have a mail server with postfix and dovecot on Archlinux where we
have mail
addresses with local unix accounts (authenticated by pam) and without
unix accounts (dovecot passwd-file authentication). The problem only
affects those non-unix account mail addresses. (There are also
comple
Hello,
i ve a problem to send with a postfix server.
when i use telnet (port 25) to send, i ve a message in mailq, but
nothing go out :
6FDA937607C1* 399 Wed Oct 19 11:20:10 t...@dm.com
t...@dm.com
when i use an other soft (mutt port 25) to send
I am trying to configure opportunistic DANE for the SMTP client on an
Ubuntu 14.04 box. The problem is I cannot get 'Verified' status for any
of the servers I tried connecting to.
For example:
# posttls-finger -t30 -T180 -c -L verbose,summary -l dane-only
smtp.kernel-error.de
posttls-finger: i
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:42:42PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> > I had two smtp lines in the master.cf file. Splutter.
>
> You're supposed to. One is for the Postfix SMTP server
> (inbound mail):
&
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 08:02:55PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 5:45 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > After trying various combinations of things in
> > main.cf and master.cf, I find that, using the script
> > below, if the mail reaches the filter script, the
delivered unfiltered, no bounces, no hops.
main.cf:
content_filter = filter
got it filtered, but resulted in the hops bounce.
What am I missing?
j.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 3:05 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > RE: the after-queue
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 3:05 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > RE: the after-queue, simple filter example
> >
> > Just trying to figure out how it works.
> > I have a feeling I don't fully understand the
re's my simple script, which is just the example script from the
FILTER_README.html page with only two or so lines changed, marked below:
#!/bin/bash
# Simple shell-based filter. It is meant to be invoked as follows:
# /path/to/script -f sender recipients...
# Localize these. The -G op
I am trying to utilize Postfix to restrict the sending of mail from certain
users based on the MAIL FROM command. However, it doesn't appear that
Postfix-2.10.2 is paying attention to my check_sender_access restrictions at
all. I have it before permit_mynetworks, but the verify daemon doesn't a
My maillog entries like like this:
Mar 18 03:45:40 jgs postfix/pickup[20868]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 8C94B4F6B:
uid=0 from=
What is the "[ID 197553 mail.info]" part?
Can I turn it off?
Thanks.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553 g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of S
t?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553 g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
ns2.arlut.utexas.edu #
However, that address is okay -- sendmail -bv says it's deliverable.
So is this disconnect between service availability and what the
user sees normal? or fixable?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553 g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:19:16PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > overlook a "too many hops" notice.
> >
> > I've seen these at my site before, they've been going on for years,
> > but they're still rare. Maybe 4-6/year. I che
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:08PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 4:45 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > I have one user telling me that he has a long mailing list
> > (on the order of 34 -- hardly long) and some of the recipients
> > bounce. If he mails them o
ion.
Does the problem above ring a bell? He's using Outlook as
his client.
What else should I tell you?
So far I haven't been able to align his bounced msgs with
my log files.
Thx, j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Sy
s
myorigin
Now, my understanding is that myorigin applies when sending mail.
It basically alters what the "from" address looks like to the
ultimate recipient.
With both relay_recipient_maps and recipient_canonical_maps defaulted,
I sent mail like so:
mail -s "gl bbb 12" g...@bbb
_canonical_maps=regexp:/etc/postfix/pfrecipient_canonical
[root@davis postfix]# more pfrecipient_canonical
/^gl@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/ g...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^a@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/a...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^b@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/b...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^c@.*\.arlut\.ute
fix]# more pfrecipient_canonical
/^gl@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/ g...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^a@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/a...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^b@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/b...@arlut.utexas.edu
/^c@.*\.arlut\.utexas\.edu$/c...@arlut.utexas.edu
This does what I want it to: it strips out the host p
sorry for the earlier post. i kept looking and found it as
"relocated users". i'll be pursuing that.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div.
that is, when someone leaves our employ, we used the sendmail
redirect feature to reply
551 user has moved, try user@arl.REDIRECT
i've been looking for the postfix equivalent, but haven't found
it. is there such a thing?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553
= /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
smtpd_use_tls = yes
Larry G. Wapnitsky MBA, MCSE, MCP+I
IT SUPPORT & ADMINISTRATION COORDINATOR
WRT <http://www.wrtdesign.com/> | Wallace Roberts & T
ed mail for delivery)
The "replacing command" notes you see from the log are replaced via
smtpd_command_filter
Thanks,
Larry G. Wapnitsky MBA, MCSE, MCP+I
IT SUPPORT & ADMINISTRATION COORDINATOR
WRT <http://www.wrtdesign.com/> | Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC
<
60$@com>
Feb 27 07:39:03 ns4 postfix/qmgr[18269]: 1B4831D62B0:
from=, size=5855, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
> > If I send a mail to someone at live.com it does not pass to the
> > fallback_relay if relayhost is down. In theory this should only
> > happen if my machine announces itself as MX for live.com. Correct?
>
> Oops, I wrote that code long enough that my memory is incorrect.
>
> Try putting t
> > The machine we are talking about is MX for all the domains that
> > belong to me (=mydestination). And exactly the way relayhost is
> > sent mails to the world they should be sent to the fallback_relay
> > if that relayhost is down.
>
> Why are you MX host for a domain, and then sending its
(sorry if this is a dupe, but I'm fixing my "undisclosed recipient"
error from earlier that someone reported to me - no disrespect intended)
I'm running PF 2.7.1 with milter-manager handling my milters. I have
MIMEDefang configured as one of the managed milters, but when I telnet
to p
I'm running PF 2.7.1 with milter-manager handling my milters. I have
MIMEDefang configured as one of the managed milters, but when I telnet
to port 25 for testing, I receive the following:
root@mailproc:/etc/milter-manager# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Esc
Thanks to all who have tried to help me so far.
I'm sorry to be such a pest. I've tried a number of things and still
can't get it.
Management wants email to
user@ .arlut.utexas.edu
will be treated as though it had been addressed to
u...@arlut.utexas.edu
(sendmail can do this.)
Can someone tell me whether the following is correct?
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias hash:/etc/aliases
It begins to look like if the file ___HAS___ colons, like the aliases
man page that comes with postfix says, and you use
postalias hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias
wi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:05:15AM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> wait a sec. i think my test procedure is not working.
> i won't be able to check until this afternoon.
> it may be the other configurations i thought i was trying
> weren't actually being used at all.
t
wait a sec. i think my test procedure is not working.
i won't be able to check until this afternoon.
it may be the other configurations i thought i was trying
weren't actually being used at all.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553 g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of S
Hello,
This machine has a list of legitimate users but does not deliver
mail locally. (It's a mail gateway.)
Presently user schumi gets copies of his mail delivered to three
systems. The three destinations are listed in virtual_alias_maps.
schumi: sch...@inm.arlut.utexas.edu,
h_destination reject_unknown_recipient_domain
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/relay_checkpermit
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pftransport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias hash:/etc/aliases
thanks again.
j.
--
Jay Scot
cific recipient domains by using a check_recipient_access map, similar
> to this example (but using the recipient, not the sender)
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#forged_sender
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553
king about how to do that.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
t i'd like, but if i gotta, i gotta.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
hi,
i just swapped postfix in replacing a sendmail configuration.
here is how i thought it worked (but i'm wrong):
my relay recipient map has entries like this:
g...@arlut.utexas.edu OK
my transport file has entries like this:
ns8.arlut.utexas.edusmtp:[ns8.arlut.utexas.edu]
i th
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:34 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
>
> "Stan Hoeppner" March 31, 2011 12:41 PM
>
> D G Teed put forth on 3/31/2011 10:21 AM:
>>
>> I'd like some idea of what real world values would be useful, or
>>> additional
>>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> D G Teed put forth on 3/31/2011 10:21 AM:
>
> > I'd like some idea of what real world values would be useful, or
> additional
> > suggestions
> > on how to make the performance less attractive to users of co
Today a user's account was compromised (likely phished) and their
credentials used to send email over our main outbound SMTP
with TLS and SASL auth.
When we learned of it, the PAM smtp configuration was set up to
block the user account authenticating and the account was soon disabled.
In the mean
Citando Victor Duchovni :
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:29:00PM -0300, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
I'm trying to limit how many messages can be sent to a recipient.
- A specific set of recipients or as a general rule?
A general rule.
- Per sender, or across the entire MTA?
The e
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:27:50PM -0300, Lauro Costa G. Borges wrote:
I'm trying to limit how many messages can be sent to a recipient.
- A specific set of recipients or as a general rule?
A general rule.
- Per sender, or across the entire MTA?
The entire MTA.
- Why?
I'm using Postfix 2.7.0.
I'm trying to limit how many messages can be sent to a recipient. I
would like it to be about 10 per minute, but I noticed it's not
possible (?) to do exactly that, from what I read at:
http://postfix.eu.org/rate.html
So I tried this:
initial_destination_concu
Firstly, can someone point me to a link on setting up just
a plain Unix mailbox (no LDAP, no fanciful stuff). I know
how to use useradd to create a Unix account & nothing
more about getting it to be able to receive external emails.
Is saslauth needed for postfix to be able to receive mails?
I'
I removed the "-D" from master.cf & restarted postfix &
stumble upon something weird just after the restart which
made me believe there could be multiple smtp processes :
(btw, the shutting down flashed out as "failed" in red, while
the startup flashed out as "OK" in green) :
# netstat -antp
>> mydomain = myportaltech.com
>> myhostname = hostname
> Is this what postconf really returns or did you redact this?
Yes, I edited it. hostname was just the name of the host as
given by Unix command 'uname -n' or `hostname`
> I'm wondering why smtpd_recipient_restrictions didn't show here
Will
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> D G Teed:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have postfix-2.8-20101007 working fine for all features for some time.
> > The problem is specific to my 2.8.0 build.
> >
> > This is on Debian. I built 2.8
Hi,
I have postfix-2.8-20101007 working fine for all features for some time.
The problem is specific to my 2.8.0 build.
This is on Debian. I built 2.8.0. with:
make makefiles CCARGS='-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DUSE_TLS -I
/usr/include/sasl -I /usr/include -DSNAPSHOT' \
AUXLIBS='-L/usr/lo
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:36:37AM -0400, D G Teed wrote:
>
> > I was running the postfix release postfix-2.8-20101007
> > for a number of months and now I want to up
Hello,
I was running the postfix release postfix-2.8-20101007
for a number of months and now I want to update to the 2.8.0 stable.
I've run into an error with make upgrade:
It ends like so:
Updating /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp...
Updating /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd...
Updating /usr/libexec/postfi
> We need to see all the smtpd logging.
Noel, so do I append "-v" or "-D" on the smtpd line in master.cf ?
Or are you referring to "strace -p postfix_process_pid" ?
> provide complete NON VERBOSE postfix logging
So do I remove "-v" & use "-D" in master.cf, restart postfix &
send test emails ?
> This log snippet is postfix trying to send mail. Did you mean to explain
> that this
> is your own host trying to send to itself? Some routers don't allow loopback
> connections, so you can't always connect to your own external IP.
I'm sending from external Outlook/Exchange to my SMTP postfix.
Sending outgoing emails from this dovecot/postfix server is Ok
(ie emails received at destination) but incoming mails keep
getting the logs below :
smtp.myportaltech.com[202.6.163.31]:25: Connection timed out
Feb 21 16:37:04 hostname postfix/smtp[1381]: 8B35C200060:
to=, relay=none, delay=30,
dela
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
> Zitat von D G Teed :
>
>
> I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
>>
>> We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
>>
>> The odd thing is that the bounce is from google m
I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
The odd thing is that the bounce is from google mail, and this Canadian ISP
does not use google mail services.
I've tested that 'host -t mx eastlnk.ca' returns the smtpin.eas
Hi,
I'm getting closer, now with SMTP permitted to whole of Internet to
connect to my SMTP/postfix server & for my postfix server to
connect out to public Internet on tcp 25 as well.
I send emails from permitted SMTP servers with "Receipt acknowledgemt"
& the ack returned said it was delivered bu
Ok, sorry. Posting in plain text now.
I'm using Cyberguard firewall & I heard it's stateful. It's not
managed by me but by the network/security guys.
So by permitting SMTP from those selected domains' SMTP
gateways to my postfix server is not sufficient even if I only
need to receive incoming m
31.68]) by
gate2.mds.com.sg with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Feb 2011 15:44:26 +0800
Received: from SGMBX02.mds.corp.int-ads ([fe80::11cd:49e0:af0f:1ba]) by
sght02.mds.corp.int-ads ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 17 Feb
2011
15:44:26 +0800
From: "G PO mds"
To: "recipient..
Sorry for the lack of info in earlier post.
Think the main issue is I can't even start up postfix :
# postfix set-permissions
[root@etc]# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
[root@ etc]# postfix reload
postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is no
Just set up postfix & it's running on my RHES 4.2 box.
Immediately after postfix is up, I test sending emails from a permitted
domain
(ahhh, on this postfix server's domain firewall, we even have a firewall
rule
which permits Tcp25 from those few sending domains' SMTP servers) using
an email clie
Thanks.
But gmail doesn't allow/accept brackets (square or round brackets)
in the "To: " field.
Any particular email client allows this? Outlook?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/14/2011 8:15 AM, sunhux G wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> Pending th
Hi
Pending the purchase of our domain, I have already set up an
SMTP email server running postfix & this server already has a
public IP address, say aa.bb.cc.dd
Q1:
Can I test send an email to this server by sending to
a_postfix_mail...@aa.bb.cc.dd ?
Q2:
Secondly after getting the domain, how d
SER=$(sed ${USER})
endif
You're not limited to bash, just to stdin stdout :) This was really
ingenious of Timo, one maintainer of dovecot as it allowed us to store a
bunch of criteria for security, such as the ip address logging in, the
last login time, etc.
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin
Our current way of blocking a spam address is by editing
access_sender & access_recipient & then reload postmap.
>From time to time we're given addresses that should never
be blocked but due to staff turnover & documentation not
up-to-date, an address that should never be blocked was
somehow block
On 1/29/2011 7:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jerrale G:
/^(.*)127\.0\.0\.\d+(.*)$/
REPLACE $1173.50.101.12$2
Surely, you will see warnings that $1173 is not a valid index.
We dont get any warnings with our OWN. We only get warnings using any
examples that have been given to us through
On 1/29/2011 7:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jerrale G:
/^(.*)127\.0\.0\.\d+(.*)$/
REPLACE $1173.50.101.12$2
Surely, you will see warnings that $1173 is not a valid index.
You need to read the section titled "TEXT SUBSTITUTION" in the
pcre_table manpage
TEXT SU
On 1/29/2011 9:30 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Noel Jones:
On 1/28/2011 4:29 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
Here is what I have tried so far:
/(^X-Spam-Status:\sYes,\sscore=\d\d(\.\d)?\s)/gi
DISCARD High Potential for Spam
That's overly complicated.
/^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ DISCARD High Spam Score
wi
Thanks very much Victor & Jeroen.
As I'm a newbie/beginner, guess I'll stick to "sender access map"
& see if there are many spoofed emails.
I have a lot to learn from this list.
Thanks
U
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan
gateways (or "mail relay servers" ??) that are
> unrelated to those domains/organizations that make Tcp25
> connection to my email server?
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:3
On 1/28/2011 5:05 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Jerrale G wrote:
sorry for not including. Centos automatically puts 127.0.0.1 as
$hostname in /etc/hosts.
could you not fix /etc/hosts? (So far as I'm concerned, the
only hostname legitimately associated with 127.0.0.1 is localhost.
Any
On 1/28/2011 3:49 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 1/28/2011 3:43 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 1/28/2011 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2011 12:24 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
This is fine as long as I know how to keep the other part of
the line in a variable, like $1 or $3 and know how to put it
all back
On 1/28/2011 3:43 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 1/28/2011 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2011 12:24 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
This is fine as long as I know how to keep the other part of
the line in a variable, like $1 or $3 and know how to put it
all back together afterwards. Could someone help me
On 1/28/2011 3:43 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 1/28/2011 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2011 12:24 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
This is fine as long as I know how to keep the other part of
the line in a variable, like $1 or $3 and know how to put it
all back together afterwards. Could someone help me
On 1/28/2011 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2011 12:24 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
This is fine as long as I know how to keep the other part of
the line in a variable, like $1 or $3 and know how to put it
all back together afterwards. Could someone help me with this,
please?
An example
On 1/28/2011 1:13 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 1/28/2011 12:51 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
We want the headers to correct show the mail system, with a bug in
centos, it shows localhost or 127.0.0.1 where it should show
mail.sheltoncomputers.com for PROPER, correct tracking.
/etc/postfix
mail.sheltoncomputers.com
What is wrong with the above? It is not replacing all instances of
127.0.0.1 OR localhost with mail.sheltoncomputers.com. You can see where
we want these replaced in our headers.
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin
So is it right to say that though I want only a small handful of
users from certain domains/organizations to send email to me,
it could be email gateways (or "mail relay servers" ??) that are
unrelated to those domains/organizations that make Tcp25
connection to my email server?
As for the externa
>>b) how do I determine the source IP address of those domains
>Email can come from anywhere, via multiple routes that do not
> have any direct relation with the sending domain.
I thought if I entered the domain name, say dsta.gov.sg into
www.mxtoolbox.com, it would list out all the smtp/mail se
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
