[pfx] Re: host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients

2024-07-10 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
On 10/07/2024 12.46, Jeff Pang wrote: > On 2024-07-10 17:06, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I sent an email with one "to" and one "cc", and in the logs, I see: >> >>   host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients

[pfx] host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients

2024-07-10 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I sent an email with one "to" and one "cc", and in the logs, I see: host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients but the next line says: Queued mail for delivery 2024-07-10 10:20:56 postfix/smtp: Untrusted TLS connection established to canadianmanganese-com.mail.protection.outloo

[pfx] host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients

2024-07-10 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I sent an email with one to: and one cc: in the logs, I see host said: 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients but the next line says: Queued mail for delivery I have pasted the full log here: https://ctxt.io/2/AACY2F5JFg what exactly is going on, and was my email delivered to both recip

[pfx] collect emails in maildir folder without delivering them to user

2024-03-18 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I am running postfix server for my personal use. On the server, I have one unix user, and multiple aliases defined in /etc/aliases, so that I can use different email addresses for different purposes. All these aliases are delivered to the users home / maildir. Now I would like to have ye

[pfx] Re: email being flagged a spam for using localhost [127.0.0.1] as first hop

2023-08-09 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-08-09 07:58, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:34:48AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote: So that the first hop looks like this: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.xxx.yyy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA

[pfx] email being flagged a spam for using localhost [127.0.0.1] as first hop

2023-08-08 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, my email was flagged as spam by Microsoft. I have the received email, together with all the headers that Microsoft added. Specifically the item: X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: I have found a tool on github, which attempts to decode this convoluted item (https://github.com/mgeeky/deco

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-07-31 15:24, Eugene R via Postfix-users wrote: Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by the Maildir standard (and the Dovecot's extensions to it) to encode various metadata such as message ID, size, flags, etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maildir https:

[pfx] Re: Maildir filename format

2023-07-31 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-07-31 15:09, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: On 2023-07-31 at 02:43:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:43:28 +0200)     1690633510.M94611123819.mail,S=11706,W=12202:2,S That message was delivered at Sat Jul 29 12:25:10 2023 UTC. It is 11706 bytes on disk and the "RFC822Size" (a.k.

[pfx] Maildir filename format

2023-07-30 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I am using Maildir format on my server (Postfix + Dovecot). The individual filenames have this format: 1690633510.M94611123819.mail,S=11706,W=12202:2,S Now, I have another, unrelated email account (not my mail server), and I have set up Thunderbird with local Maildir support. When I

[pfx] spamlist checks

2023-06-22 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, does anybody have experience with checking and removing email addresses from spam lists? I got this when sending email: SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: mailrelay.nova.gr (80.245.166.6) reason: 550 Rule imposed as ***@*** is blacklisted on Spamhaus - see www.spamh

[pfx] Re: SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record

2023-04-12 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-04-12 15:30, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users: > On 2023-04-12 14:48, Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users wrote: The smtp_helo_name used in the Postfix SMTP client should resolve to the client IP address that is seen by a remote SMTP

[pfx] Re: SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record

2023-04-12 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-04-12 14:48, Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users wrote: 2) change smtp_helo_name to smtp_helo_name = $mydomain It is very strange, i think. what do you mean? is it strange to use example.com, instead of mail.example.com as smtp_helo_name, when the smtp client is actually mail

[pfx] SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record

2023-04-12 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I have domain mydomain.com, with mx record: $ host -t mx mydomain.com mail.mydomain.com and I have SPF record on my domain: host -t txt mydomain.com which is the ip address of mail.mydomain.com I have no SPF record on mail.mydomain.com itself. Now, when I check my email score o

[pfx] postfix and opendkim

2023-04-10 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I am setting up opendkim on my postfix server: what is the practical difference between using inet or UNIX domain socket in /etc/opendkim.conf ? If I leave socket at the default settings: Socket local:/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock What do I need to put into /etc/postfix/main.cf in

[pfx] Re: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE

2023-03-20 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
> On 2023-03-20 15:30, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users: I occasionally see timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE in my logs: When asking a timing related question, it would be helpful if you did not delete the timing related onfo from the logs. I h

[pfx] timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE

2023-03-20 Thread Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users
Hello, I occasionally see timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE in my logs: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from mail-lf1-f49.google.com[209.85.167.49] disconnect from mail-lf1-f49.google.com[209.85.167.49] ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 bdat=1 commands=6 Is this misbehaving client, or might this be s