> On Apr 17, 2025, at 05:36, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-17 at 05:09:25 UTC-0400 (Thu, 17 Apr 2025 02:09:25 -0700)
> Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Long IDs and not a lot of spam. Normal is in the 10s daily.
postfix for specific email, it not mean anything outside of
> it.
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, 09:53 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users,
> wrote:
> Lately, when I look at the mail queue I see IDs that end in PPn where n is an
> integer. So far, all of them have been bounces of spam.
ue
> > identifier inside postfix for specific email, it not mean anything outside
> > of it.
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, 09:53 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users,
> > wrote:
> > Lately, when I look at the mail queue I see IDs that end in PPn where n is
> > an integ
Lately, when I look at the mail queue I see IDs that end in PPn where n is an
integer. So far, all of them have been bounces of spam. Is my understanding
correct and if so is there a way to automagically dequeue those? Thanks,
-- Doug
___
Postfix-u
> On Mar 19, 2025, at 15:24, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2025-03-19 at 17:52:02 UTC-0400 (Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:52:02 -0700)
> Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> In the web page:
>> https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5
In the web page:
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unverified_recipient, the
example given uses reject_unauth_destination. Are those the same, or is that a
typo?
-- Doug
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To un
> On Mar 12, 2025, at 19:06, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 06:42:48PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Then I went to find what's in /var/run/postfix.
>
> Normally, messages are in /var/spool/postfix
> On Mar 12, 2025, at 13:46, Kenneth Porter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Could you run them side by side with the new server having a higher MX
> priority? Any mail arriving on the old server after that would likely be from
> spammers/scammers/malware (who like to target low-priority MX se
Thanks to all. I decided to look at the mail queue at this moment. There are
4 messages listed. Then I went to find what's in /var/run/postfix. There are
4 messages in defer/* and they match the mailq entries. However, there are
1179 messages in deferred/*. Most are dated in 2017, but ther
My mail server is over 13 years old. Rather than waiting for it to fail, I
have provisioned a replacement. It has the identical configration as the
production server. It has been tested on my local LAN and works just the same
as the production server. My plan for the switch over is to shutdo
-- Doug
> On Apr 24, 2024, at 09:05, John Levine via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> said:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:01:46AM -, John Levine via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
I must be interpreting this wrong because it appears postf
> On Apr 23, 2024, at 12:08, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:46:22AM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>>> RFC 3676 addresses this.
>>
>> That was an amazing and helpful response. RFC 2045 showed exact
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 23:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 22.04.24 22:55, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>> This is probably not the right place to be asking this as it is not directly
>> Postfix related, but I don't know a bett
This is probably not the right place to be asking this as it is not directly
Postfix related, but I don't know a better group to ask. For years I have sent
text messages and just let the lines run on. Only inserting a \n for the start
of a
new paragraph. I never exceed the 988 line length li
> On Feb 10, 2024, at 15:55, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie via Postfix-users:
>> I used Viktor's collate to trace a specific email handling. There were a
>> number of these entries. However, I am only showing 2 of them:
>>
I used Viktor's collate to trace a specific email handling. There were a
number of these entries. However, I am only showing 2 of them:
Feb 10 03:15:40 mail postfix/smtp[60428]: 4TWjVT5qz7z2gF8w:
to=,
orig_to=,
relay=mx01.t-online.de[194.25.134.72]:25, delay=59371, delays=59369/0.02/1.5/0,
> On Feb 8, 2024, at 01:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 07.02.24 21:51, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote:
>> +1 on setting up SRS, it helps with Gmail and I believe ARC does too
>> (although I don't have hard data on this). Interesting note about postgrey,
>>
> On Feb 7, 2024, at 17:23, Alex via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping I could ask for some advice. We have a pretty large percentage of
> users who forward mail through our systems to personal Gmail accounts.
> Sometimes it is mail from bulk senders like mailgun and lanyon/cvent.
I am using postfix with postsrsd. Is there a way for postfix to log the from
address as originally received? The only addresses I find in postfix's log are
the converted addresses from postsrsd. Both addresses are logged by postsrsd,
but there is no way to tie it back to the postfix logs for
> On Dec 7, 2023, at 00:27, patpro--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> December 7, 2023 9:12 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users"
> wrote:
>
>> Indeed: postsrsd upgraded: 1.10 -> 2.0.8_1,1
>
> OK. I’m still running 1.10 : it does not use a config fil
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 23:48, patpro--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> December 6, 2023 10:00 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users"
> wrote:
>
>> I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and ran
>> fine. However postsrsd
think about what it should be doing ;-)
-- Doug
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 09:07, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-06 at 04:00:21 UTC-0500 (Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:00:21 -0800)
> Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> I just upgrade
Not that I can find
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 02:49, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 6.12.2023 o godz. 01:00:21 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users pisze:
>> The config files (conf and conf.sample) all had dates
>> of 14 Nov so I suspect they were replaced
I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and ran
fine. However postsrsd is causing me a few issues. I get the impression that
postsrsd got updated, but I can't tell for sure. At the moment, the version is
2.0.8. The config files (conf and conf.sample) all had dates
gt;> This way, even forwarding using ~user/.forward will get SRS'ed.
>>>
>>> However, any mail from foreign domains without DKIM may still get rejected.
>
> On 29.10.23 11:57, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>> I run a similar mail server. I use SRS and
-- Doug
> On Oct 29, 2023, at 10:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 29.10.23 16:43, Robert Inder via Postfix-users wrote:
>> For 10 years now I've been running a Linux (CentOS 7) server, using
>> Postfix to handle mail for a handful of users.
>> Specifically, I'm runn
> On May 2, 2023, at 16:14, kwoody--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>>> Log for the nightly cron job run:
>>>
>>> 03:01:09 mail sendmail[10703]: 342A19Wv010703: from=root,
>> size=14672,
>>> class=0, nrcpts=1,
>>> msgid=<202305021001.342a19wv010...@mail.citytel.net>,
>>> relay=root@localhost
>>
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 00:06, Roger Klorese via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Reply-To, not Reply To.
>
What a bone-head mistake. Thanks. Now it works just fine.
-- Doug
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe s
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 23:13, Noel Jones via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first
>> line it se
I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first line
it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line. However, that causes
postfix to terminate the headers and puts the Reply To line after the blank
line at the end of theheaders. As a result, none of the following
> On Apr 8, 2023, at 13:15, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 12:16:30PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>>>> Are there any others and how close am I?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.iana.org/
> On Apr 8, 2023, at 11:59, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:51:06AM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> A couple of questions. Looking in the postfix generated Received:
>> header, the SMTP id often has a
A couple of questions. Looking in the postfix generated Received: header, the
SMTP id often has a few other letters included: ESMTPA etc. I am guessing
that the extra letters mean:
E - EHLO used rather the HELO
S - SSL was used in the connection
A - the originator was
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 16:23, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> ...
>
> Well, this does not have the "inline:{{...}}" guard.
>
>>> incoming_smtpd_restrictions =
>>> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10040,
>>> reject_invalid_hostname,
>>> rejec
-- Doug
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 15:04, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:53:42PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>>> inline:{{digitalinsight.firefightersfirstcreditunion.org =
>>> permit_auth_destination}}
>>> or
>>>
>>> inline:{digitalinsight.firefigh
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 14:27, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:15:27PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Thanks Viktor. I went with the first approach and am getting errors:
&
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 13:28, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:52:01PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> I don't want to remove the "reject_unknown_sender_domain" function as
>> it gets used pr
I have a specific email sender that is getting the error "Sender addresses
rejected: Domain not found". Sure enough DNS provides no response for that
domain. If I drop off the first part of the domain name, then DNS returns a
response. However, the organization is using the complete name whic
> On Mar 19, 2023, at 18:26, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 03:48:07PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Is there a debug setting that will show which tables are searched when
>> an incoming email is received
Is there a debug setting that will show which tables are searched when an
incoming email is received and delivered to a mailbox?
-- Doug
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@pos
40 matches
Mail list logo
