ransport map for a next hop of all emails.
Thank you
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 04/07/2025 21:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users:
Hi Postfix community,
Does anybody know the original reason of why there is no way to adjust
resp
Hi Postfix community,
Does anybody know the original reason of why there is no way to adjust
response code for Alias expansion error (internal loop detected) in
Postfix settings?
Log: unreasonable virtual_alias_maps map nesting for j@example.com
-- message not accepted, try again later
Hi Jorge,
To have SMTPUTF8 enabled in system it should be supported by all
components of mail system.
If you have LMTP as f.e. Dovecot which not yet production ready for
SMTPUTF8 (at least from my view, as it only got support of it couple of
months ago and I would not rush deploying it on Pr
Hello Wietse,
It would be really a solution, thank you :)
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 01/05/2025 19:17, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
I have given this some thought and conclude that most of Postfix
isn't architected to report a hard error for an 'impossible' databa
Funny thing - as I come to memcache in scope of email length validation
I decided to check how its working too, and on practice it's also
results in endless errors and 4xx failures when doing verify or any
other operation. On verify it's critical as I was right that it creates
double-bounces to
On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On 19/04/2025 13:09, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
To rewrite envelope recipients, use "virtual_aliases", not
"recipient_canonical_maps".
Hi Viktor, sorry, but for me this not solution. The whole point of SRS
is to utili
On 18/04/2025 20:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
I remember now when I implemented SRS, I configured separate postfix
instance for outgoing mail. This is the postfix issue described in
postsrs docs: canonical maps are processed when mail is being received.
Yep, I have 2 s
Hi Matus,
strange, according to
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#socketmap_max_reply_size the
maximum reply size is 100k by default.
I use postsrd without problems.
want to highlight this is not permanent issue and this is first time I
see such error over very long time I had SRS, erro
Actually nope, I don't know how you manage your SA, it's another issue,
but for well designed system it's totally okay to have different actions
for different conditions. I not SA guru, but for Rspamd I know for sure
that you easily can do stuff like force actions based on multimaps
prefilters,
More over issue not in SRS, issue actually about postfix in general. I
don't know why there no defaults to do any validations check of
sender|rcpts.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 13:20, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-
if you like we can speak about ARC and Rspamd in Rspamd community:
https://t.me/rspamd I'm active there - @drago_angel - but it's just for
a fun, it will not help with case I trying to solve.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 14:00, Dmytro Alieksieiev wrote:
see headers
1. ARC not provide a way to send bounce to sender when rcpt behind srs
can't accept email due to x reasons. SRS needed when you doing
forwarding service.
2. ARC not used on practice to trust email without DKIM and failed SPF,
if you not rewrite envelope on forwarding mentioned rspamd will
pot
Hi Benn, you want propose any better alternatives for a forwarding to
not break SPF and have ability properly send emails without DKIM?
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
DevOps Engineer
On 18/04/2025 13:20, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users skrev den 2025
Hi community,
I get a bit annoying spam lately to rcpts like
<1239123129381239...@example.com> where localpart is bunch of numbers
and just localpart alone length is more then 300 chars.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.1 says
"The maximum total length of a user
Hi Postfix community,
I faced issue with splitting emails via local filter and
destination_recipient_limit = 1 under low memory condition which result
in duplicated emails in queue.
From what I can see in logs:
- warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp pid 1039 killed by signal 9
- warnin
way to improve code to avoid duplicated
emails at OOM.
Regards,
Dmytro Alieksieiev
On 04/04/2025 03:32, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:17:22PM +0200, Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users
wrote:
I faced issue with splitting emails via local filter and
destinati
16 matches
Mail list logo
