1]:25,
delay=0.99, delays=0.1/0.06/0.53/0.31, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok: Message
738976384 accepted)
Jan 17 11:16:47 rndusljpp2 postfix/qmgr[49363]: EE60E12A0913: removed
Thanks!
Derek Allison
ScIT Manager
dalli...@its.jnj.com<mailto:d
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 20:13:10 -0400
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Derek B. Noonburg wrote:
>
> > I'm running postfix to handle email for several users. One of them
> > has a .forward file that points to a gmail address. Gmail'
anks in advance for any advice.
- Derek
Wietse Venema writes:
> Derek Atkins:
>> Wietse Venema writes:
>>
>> > For the record: mynetworks has always supported net/mask notation.
>>
>> Of course, but that wasn't what I was talking about, and it never was.
>> I was talking about &q
local address matching". But whatever. It's working in 2.9, which is
all I really care about.
Thanks,
> Wietse
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board
Wietse Venema writes:
> Derek Atkins:
>> Viktor Dukhovni writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:35:54PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 1.2.3.4/24 192.168.1.0/24
>> >> >>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:35:54PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 1.2.3.4/24 192.168.1.0/24 [2001:1234:1234::]/48
>> >> [fe80::]/10 [fe80::%eth0]/10 [::1]/128
>>
>> Yes, I have. In fact that
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:35:54PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 1.2.3.4/24 192.168.1.0/24 [2001:1234:1234::]/48
>> >> [fe80::]/10 [fe80::%eth0]/10 [::1]/128
>>
>> Yes, I have. In fact that
DTNX Postmaster writes:
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 18:35, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> Hey Louis!
>>
>> Louis Kowolowski writes:
>>
>>> On May 31, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> Here is the mynetworks conf
Hey Louis!
Louis Kowolowski writes:
> On May 31, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Here is the mynetworks configuration:
>>
>> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 1.2.3.4/24 192.168.1.0/24 [2001:1234:1234::]/48
>> [fe80::]/10 [fe80::%eth0]/10 [::1]/12
s in the reject_unverified_sender.
What am I doing wrong? Do I have the correct encoding of a link local
address? Or is there a problem with postfix matching a v6 link local
address?
This is postfix-2.7.4-1.fc14.i686
If this is a bug, has this been fixed in a more recent release?
Thanks,
-dere
Also my thoughts are it might be redundant having "reject_rbl_client"
and "reject_rhsbl_sender" under "smtpd_recipient_restrictions" - can
anyone comment?
Thanks for your time, appreciate it
Cheers
Derek
12 matches
Mail list logo