Re: Kernel Oops

Hi Viktor, I have tried both statfs() and statvfs() and it shows the similar behaivour. 2011/3/6 Victor Duchovni : > The "fsspace" function is a Postfix utility function, the underlying > system interface is either statfs() or statvfs(). You should find > out which is used on your system and test

Re: Kernel Oops

&fsbuf)` satisfies me so far. Best regards, Denis Shulyaka 2011/3/6 Victor Duchovni : > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 06:24:57PM +0300, Denis Shulyaka wrote: > >> If I pass change `fsspace(".", &fsbuf);' to `fsspace("/", &fsbuf);' it >> works, no

Re: Kernel Oops

ean? Is it the dir postfix has been started from? 2011/3/5 Denis Shulyaka : > Hi all, > > I have investigated the problem a little, and here are some results: > > First of all, it has nothing to do with memory consumption. The smtpd > crashes on statfs() in fsspase() function,

Re: Kernel Oops

. In the suggested System.map file the closest entry is 'alloc_page_buffers'. The default_process_limit, qmgr_message_active_limit and qmgr_message_recipient_limit tweaks have no effect at all. Any thoughts why statfs() may trigger a kernel oops? Best regards, Denis Shulyaka 2011/

Re: Kernel Oops

Hi Daniel, Actually it's D-Link DIR 825 with attached USB hard drive, and it's white and stylish! 2011/3/4 Daniel Bromberg : > On 3/4/2011 2:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >> Steve Jenkins: >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Denis Shulyaka >>

Re: Kernel Oops

Hi Noel, Wietse, Thanks! I will try to do this and will update you with the result. Best regards, Denis Shulyaka

Re: Kernel Oops

Hi John, I don't agree with Philip, but the only way to prove my point is to make it running. I will need to see it myself to believe that 64M RAM + swap is not enough. 2011/3/4 john : > I think you should listen to the advise you were given on the OpenWRT > developers forum by Philip.

Re: Kernel Oops

Hi Wietse, How much memory does smtpd need to receive a message, approximately? Can I tweak this value somehow? 2011/3/4 Wietse Venema : > Denis Shulyaka: >> Hi Ralf, >> >> Thanks for the response. >> I think 13 Mb should be well enough for receiving a message

Re: Kernel Oops

Hi Ralf, Thanks for the response. I think 13 Mb should be well enough for receiving a message, and I also expect some different error message if it is a memory allocation problem. 2011/3/4 Ralf Hildebrandt : > Sounds like you run out of memory. > But let's see what the others say... > >> # free >

Kernel Oops

used free shared buffers Mem:6204048348136920 5916 Swap: 524284 0 524284 Total: 58632448348 537976 Best regards, Denis Shulyaka