smtpd_client_message_rate_limit=0
-o smtpd_client_new_tls_session_rate_limit=0
Are the *_limit=0 lines above correct for overriding the
main.cf values?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:50 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:25:19PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> Is there somet
ss_list and the
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions that could bypass
dnsbl and rate limiting for SASL authenticated senders?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
>> I have to be overlooking something here but I have tripple
>> checked everything and read the documentat
I have to be overlooking something here but I have tripple
checked everything and read the documentation multiple
times.
I am trying to use https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite
to bypass postscreen checks, primarily dnsbl checks. It
appears that postscreen is not bypassing dnsbl checks:
mai
I know there is a "postfix check" that will do some basic checks of
permissions and directories, but is there a command that will check config
file syntax? For example, if an IP address is fat-fingered in the
mynetworks line, postfix will reload and run but gives "Temporary lookup
failure" errors
smtpd_data_restrictions fixed my issue and I see the header now.
Thank you.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
> > Feb 19 16:55:12 smtp1 postfwd[27034]: [RULES] rule=4, id=RCPTCNT1,
> > queue=C2B7433E7CE, client=unknown[172.27.0.203], sender=<
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> On 04/02/15 12:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>>
>> Use postfwd, set a rule that triggers with too many recipients
>> per SASL login. http://www.postfwd.org/
>>
>> Wietse
>>
>
> Policyd can also do that, check both.
>
> http://w
Thank you for the postfwd link. Not sure why I didn't find this during my
research. I guess I didn't have the right Google keywords. :)
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
> > I need to be able to relay outbound for this customer of ours as
stfix Policy Servers or daemons able
> to provide such kind of feature, like the X-Itools ELSE project with its
> RTAAM engine for example.
>
>
>
> Le 04/02/2015 14:34, Dave Jones a écrit :
>
> I have a sneaky spammer that is using compromised accounts of a mail
>> s
I have a sneaky spammer that is using compromised accounts of a mail server
that relays outbound through my Postfix servers. The spammer is Bcc'ing
200 or 300 recipients at a time and sending very slowly to avoid my high
volume detection. I need to be able to add a header that SpamAssassin can
us
I filter mail for a lot of mailboxes where I normally see 20+ messages from
account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com per day.
The last one I see is on 10/1/14 at 13:25 GMT-5 (Central US).
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> [ Bcc to someone at Microsoft who may be abl
>Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme:
>>
>>dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3
>>swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3
>AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has that
>changed?
Nope. They are still empty. I just checked my fresh data feed and
they only have
>Dave Jones:
>> I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success.
>>
>> Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce
>> but always tempfail/requeue?
>You could configure a dedicated SMTP client in master.cf with "
I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success.
Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce
but always tempfail/requeue?
AOL bounces these back to our senders but I would like for them to
stay in the queue so I can resend them later. If they would
> Dave Jones:
> > >On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90])
> > >> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688
> > >> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013
>On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>
>> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90])
>> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688
>> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:04:46 -0500 (CDT)
>>
>> My forward DNS lookup for t
The past few weeks or so my Postfix relays have been showing "unknown"
in the logs and headers for some (not all) hosts causing a hit on the
SpamAssassin RDNS_NONE rule. These servers have a local caching DNS
server on them that forward to another pair of caching DNS servers
that run BIND and rbld
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave Jones:
>> I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any
>> information about multiple destinations (preferably primary /
>> secondary).
>
> If it is not documented, then it is not imp
I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any
information about multiple destinations (preferably primary /
secondary).
Sendmail has a mailertable entry like this:
domain.com smtp:[primary.domain.com]:[secondary.domain.com]
It will only deliver to the secondary server wh
I have a server running postfix on port 25 and a secondary mail
platform listening on port 2525. I have tried many combinations of
settings but keep getting:
Feb 12 08:34:43 server1 postfix/smtp[11104]: 19183EB01F0:
to=, relay=none, delay=6.9, delays=6.9/0.01/0/0,
dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
19 matches
Mail list logo
