On 23/01/2015 19:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
Chris Robinson:
On 23/01/2015 17:14, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/23/2015 7:42 AM, Chris Robinson wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to use the postfix policy delegation mechanism to
filter the transport:destination differently for individual
recipients in a
On 23/01/2015 17:14, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/23/2015 7:42 AM, Chris Robinson wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to use the postfix policy delegation mechanism to
filter the transport:destination differently for individual
recipients in a multi-recipient message?
The FILTER action is a per
fwd to apply the rule separately and
individually to each recipient?
> Unfortunately not. Of course you could integrate postfwd at 'RCPT TO' stage
but then afaik the size attribute does not work reliable
Can anyone help me with this
Thanks,
Chris Robinson
On 20/01/2015 23:03, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/20/2015 2:08 PM, Chris Robinson wrote:
On 20/01/2015 19:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
To answer the question:
man 5 postconf
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps (default: empty)
...
This information is overruled with relay_transport
e
rule. I will try again tomorrow morning - it's late here.
Chris Robinson
om but no joy.
Postfwd is definitely running and listening on port 10040.
So my question is how can I get "check_policy_service" to override
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
Thank you,
Chris Robinson
current on FreeBSD 8.3
mail_version = 2.10-20120423
!DSPAM:4fbb94d5193091048919757!
I'd guess it's the Linux version no, since that's where the server name
normally goes. Try uname -a.
Chris Robinson