Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 07:09:29PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
>
>>> Though now I'm getting this error after sending bounce to pipe:
>>> Mar 20 12:41:54 mail-dr postfix/pipe[10163]: warning: unexpected attribute
>>> nrequest from bounce socket
>>> (expecting: flags)
>>> Mar
--
Chris Dos
Senior Engineer
Cell: 303-520-1821
Chris Dos wrote:
> Chris Dos wrote:
>> Noel Jones wrote:
>>>> Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
>>>> unknown on the other end and it is rejected
>>>> right away, i
Chris Dos wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>>> Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
>>> unknown on the other end and it is rejected
>>> right away, is there another way to do this.
>>>
>>> The whole point of this exercise f
Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>> Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
>> unknown on the other end and it is rejected
>> right away, is there another way to do this.
>>
>> The whole point of this exercise for me is to just intercept a bounce
>> back and process it internally inst
Noel Jones wrote:
> Chris Dos wrote:
>>
>> Well, pointing the gun the wrong way is differently something that I
>> don't want to be doing. But in the case,
>> I'm confused. I'm having mail-dr send out to another server,
>> mail.chrisdos.com, on the
Noel Jones wrote:
>> I was was reading the header_checks won't work on bounced mail. I
>> setup a regexp check_recipient_access map.
>> This is the regexp file verp_redirect.regexp :
>> /^RCPT TO:.+\+.+\=...@.+\..+$/ REDIRECTverpbounce
>>
>> It's still not working. Here is the p
Noel Jones wrote:
> Chris Dos wrote:
>> Noel Jones wrote:
>>>> It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:
>>>> So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
>>>> postmap -q "RCPT TO:"
>>>> regexp:header_checks.re
> I don't see a forward action in header_checks. Maybe you intend to use
> REDIRECT? Postfix access tables allow more than accept/reject,
> including REDIRECT.
> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
>
> But my point is that header_checks are the wrong tool for the job.
> There is no guarantee t
Noel Jones wrote:
>> It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:
>> So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
>> postmap -q "RCPT TO:"
>> regexp:header_checks.regexp
>> and it came back with a result of DISCARD.
>>
>> So I guess I don't understand how you said it will never match a
Wietse Venema wrote:
> That is what YOU believe. You probably made a typo somewhere. This
> is why you should post "postconf -n" command output, as requested
> in the mailing list welcome message which you decided to ignore.
>
>> I don't believe that header addresses contain ONLY an e-mail
>> addr
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/17/2009, Chris Dos (ch...@chrisdos.com) wrote:
>> Sorry, I did have:
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>> in another part of my main.cf file.
>
> One reason why the DEBUG_README asks (among other things) that you
> provide output of postconf -n
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris Dos:
>> relay=mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73]:25, delay=0.19,
>> delays=0.02/0/0.11/0.05, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
>> mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73] said: 550 5.1.1
>> : Recipient
>> address rejected: User unknown in local rec
I'm at a loss why this is not working. I'm sending a VERP SMTP e-mail using
the following script:
(
echo "EHLO $(uname -n)"
echo "MAIL FROM: XVERP"
echo "RCPT TO:"
echo "DATA"
echo "From: "
echo "To: "
echo "Subject: Testing VERP"
echo ""
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> Sure thing. Right now I just have two lists at this domain:
> l...@domain.com and admin-l...@domain.com and so I have just this line
> in my
> regexp table:
>
> /^(admin\-)?lis...@domain\.com$/i boun...@domain.com
>
> It's a bit oversimplified, but it gets the job done.
Th
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> It won't add bounce+ to the beginning of every email, but you can use
> VERP. It might prove more useful anyways as hosts don't always include
> the "to" email address when sending back bounced messages. The format
> is like this:
>
> mailinglistname+senderuser=senderdo...
What would be the best way to add a "bounce+" to the beginning of every
"Return-Path" address for outgoing
e-mail? I've been digging for two days and have not found a workable solution.
Chris
Peter Blair wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Chris Dos wrote:
>> I've been tasked to figure out a way for our three postfix relay servers to
>> intercept every hard bounced back
>> e-mail and process it for our web application.
>>
>> We have about
Noel Jones wrote:
> Chris Dos wrote:
>> I've been tasked to figure out a way for our three postfix relay
>> servers to intercept every hard bounced back
>> e-mail and process it for our web application.
>>
>> We have about nine servers relaying mail throug
I've been tasked to figure out a way for our three postfix relay servers to
intercept every hard bounced back
e-mail and process it for our web application.
We have about nine servers relaying mail through our three postfix servers.
These servers send mail on behalf
of our clients. I'm trying
19 matches
Mail list logo
