Hello all,
I recently rebuilt a server for use with Mailman and Postfix. I have the server
running, Mailman and Postfix installed. I am using Postfix 2.10.1. I copied
the main.cf file over from the old server to the new server.
When I post a message to one of the Mailman lists, I encounter an
Once upon a time, PGNd said:
> On quick investigation, @ spamhaus now says
> (http://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/713/) return codes have changed:
Those are dbl response codes, not zen. You are mixing the two up, but
they are very different.
--
Chris Adams
ically (scanning the whole
mailbox), and there was no quick way to check the quota status (it took
reading 55,000 files). Dovecot can store quotas in a database, so
checking them now is one SELECT (that takes a fraction of a second)
away.
--
Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Scott Kitterman said:
> Great. Feel free to throw RFC 7208 Section 3.4 (Record Size) at them. The
> SHOULD fit in a UDP packet is there for a reason.
I see your RFC and raise you RFC 6891. "[f]it in a UDP packet" does not
mean 512 bytes.
--
Chris Adams
assigned use, and not that many things support it. Its
use is deprecated, but MS Outlook (at least some versions) only support
SSL-wrapped SMTP on port 465 (they don't handle the standard way of
connecting to 587 and then issuing STARTTLS).
--
Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Wietse Venema said:
> Chris Adams:
> > I'm setting up Postfix+Dovecot on CentOS 7 (prefer to use the
> > OS-provided versions, Postfix 2.10.1 and Dovecot 2.2.10). I need to
> > handle SMTP AUTH for a couple of different domains where the customer
>
ostfix 3.1 snapshot).
Am I missing something? Is there another way to do this?
--
Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Wietse Venema said:
> Chris Adams:
> > > P.S.: I complied with your Reply-To: and sent the Cc:. It will fail
> > > SPF, if you're checking that.
> >
> > That's not me; that's the list.
>
> I think he refers to this:
>
Once upon a time, /dev/rob0 said:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 06:50:38PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I wrote a milter for our Plesk servers to check quota at RCPT TO
> > time instead (and return a permanent error for over-quota) to fix
> > the bad behavior.
>
> Unfor
-quota message into a permanent error, at least for messages
with multiple recipients).
I wrote a milter for our Plesk servers to check quota at RCPT TO time
instead (and return a permanent error for over-quota) to fix the bad
behavior.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiW
defang/amavis since I was just looking for basic
spam blocking.
Thanks.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ce, and that the
message gets saved (so I can review when somebody complains).
Thanks; I guess I'll take a look at amavis.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
do this.
If it matters, this is Postfix 2.6.6 on CentOS 6.
Thanks.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
13 matches
Mail list logo