natan via Postfix-users escribió el 27/06/2024 a las 15:48:
W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi Scott
Jun 27 15:39:06 MX policyd-spf[3729]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror
(mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=200.28.23.150;
helo=200-28-23-150.baf.movistar.cl
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 13/12/2023 a las 1:59:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
Thus, the Postfix code that handles header update/delete requests
was still naively skipping the first header, making calls to delete
the prepended Received-SPF: header ineffective, and mis
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 22:30:
Wietse Venema:
Patch below.
Carlos Velasco:
Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
No duplicated "Received-SPF" and *removing "Received" in position
1 is now not the own generated, is really the firs
Bill Cole via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 15:31:
On 2023-12-10 at 16:37:16 UTC-0500 (Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:37:16 +0100)
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
And doing the same work in 2 different places can be called software
efficiency?
No, but the
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 11/12/2023 a las 1:11:
Patch below.
Tested patch against 3.8.3, now it works as expected. Thank you.
No duplicated "Received-SPF" and removing "Received" in position 1 is now not
the own generated, is really the first one Received seen in the milter.
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 22:54:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribi? el 10/12/2023 a las 21:53:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribi? el 10/12/2023 a las 19:44:
Carlos Velasco via
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 22:32:
Dnia 10.12.2023 o godz. 22:16:27 Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users pisze:
That is because every Milter in the real world gets the client info
>from the smfi_connect() callback function and from Milter macros,
instead
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 21:53:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribi? el 10/12/2023 a las 19:44:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
*** And there is the milter, is custom made ***
You need to reduce complexity.
- If
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 19:44:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
*** And there is the milter, is custom made ***
You need to reduce complexity.
- If you remove the Milter, is the header still duplicated?
No.
Duplication only happens when, in milter, I
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 18:49:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
That means you are somehow calling the policy server twice.
You didn't mention what version of the SPF policy server you are
using. Recent versions (under the project name SPF Engine,
Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 18:09:
On December 10, 2023 3:54:13 PM UTC, Carlos Velasco via
Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 15:53:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
2. Duplicated SMTP Access Policy
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió el 10/12/2023 a las 15:53:
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users:
2. Duplicated SMTP Access Policy Delegation
This issue is related to headers too.
I'm using pypolicyd-spf as policy daemon to check SPF. It is working fine.
The execution happens before m
Hi,
Things have gotten stranger for case 1.
If milter "chgheader" is used, the Index 1 is the hidden (prepended) header of
postfix. So, you must start in index = 2 to delete the first header received in header
callback.
Regards,
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users escr
Hello,
I'm migrating a postfix server from "Before-Queue Content Filter" to "before-queue
Milter". Postfix version is 3.8.3
The process is going well but I have found 2 weird things:
1. Postfix hides its own Postfix-prepended Received: header, for compatibility
with Sendmail.
This was unexpect
14 matches
Mail list logo
