On 11/27/2012 12:40 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm facing a boring problem for few accounts ( less than 10 over 2000 )
> on my freebsd 9.0 mailhub , see below the error message I get in maillog
>
>
> Nov 27 17:59:45 mail postfix/local[11988]: 3Y9n2B5TH9zYmgf:
> to=, orig_to=, relay=local,
On 10/10/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I think I may not what's wrong. Here's the master.cf settings:
>
> In reading the docs it says to comment out the smtp line and uncomment
> the one that routes to postscreen. I have both uncommented.
>
> # grep -v "#" /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf
On 9/26/2012 9:32 AM, Harakiri wrote:
> When trying to sent a mail to -u...@domain.com postfix will complain
>
> warning: Illegal address syntax from host in RCPT command: <-u...@domain.com>
>
> and reject the message with "501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax".
>
> Now can anyone point me to th
On 9/7/2012 4:44 PM, General Mail wrote:
> On 9/7/2012 4:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> General Mail:
>>> On 9/7/2012 3:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
General Mail:
> /etc/postfix/access
> ad...@bombshellz.net OK
> no-re...@bombshellz.net OK
> * REJECT "$access_map_reject_code Y
On 8/27/2012 3:03 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
> on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
> it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content fil
On 8/21/2012 11:02 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
>
> On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
>>
>>> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>>>
>>> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
>>> Host 107.178.2
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
On 8/15/2012 6:41 AM, Sense Zeng wrote:
> postfix version: 2.9.3-2
> system: ubuntu 12.04
>
> postfix is configure as a smarthost
> How can I permit some localuser send mail in shell (run sendmail) and
> deny other users?
Please refer to 'man 5 postconf' and search for authorized_submit_users
or ht
On 8/8/2012 3:03 PM, email builder wrote:
>
> I don't think mine is so confusing as you suggest if you take a second to
> understand it. Maybe if you read it with some whitespace:
>
> select
> if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
> IFNULL(
> (select dest from aliases where addr =
On 7/26/2012 8:31 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Den 2012-07-26 13:16, Wietse Venema skrev:
>
>>> will it be possible at all to drop berkdb now ?
>>
>> Postfix has always supported systems without Berkeley DB. Such
>> systems have some other default_database_type setting. For example,
>> SunOS, HP-U
On 7/10/2012 1:36 PM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> Thanks for Brian's answer*
> *
> 1 I add the missed,such as
> [root@mail postfix-2.9.3]# make -f Makefile.init makefiles
> CCARGS="-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/local/mysql/include"
> AUXLIBS="-L/usr/local/mysql/lib -lmysqlclient"
> and still have the pr
On 7/10/2012 11:52 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> Hello My friend
>
> My system is Centos 6.2 with postfix-2.6.6, When I use command
> postconf -m, and got many support:
> btree;cidr;environ;hash;ldap;mysql;nis;pcre;proxy;regexp;static;unix;
> So I down the new version postfix-2.9.3, and use make install,
On 7/3/2012 11:02 AM, Marko Weber wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> when i do on console
>
> # postfix reload
>
> i get:
>
> /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
> virtual_create_maildirsize=yes
> /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
> virtual_mai
On 6/26/2012 2:46 AM, Ram wrote:
> I have a custom milter in C ( for email archiving ) which works fine
> on my servers with postfix 2.8+. ( RHEL 5.5 )
>
> When I tried to install the milter on a ubuntu box with postfix 2.7 ,
> unless I create the socket inside spool directory for eg.
> /var/spool/
On 6/15/2012 9:26 AM, Alain Deseine wrote:
> When i try locally, using telnet, it's ok again :
>
> *ks3094730:~ # telnet localhost 25
> Trying ::1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 xxx..fr ESMTP Postfix
> EHLO TETE
> 250-AUTH GSSAPI LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5
> *
Notic
On 6/4/2012 2:07 PM, james wrote:
> We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers
> with postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when
> a test tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
>
> 2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]:
> NOQUEUE:
On 5/25/2012 1:13 PM, JL Picard wrote:
> #Here are some modifications (in diff format) to master.cf to get more
> logging:
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v
> smtp unix - - n - - smtp -v
Please do not post or enable verbose logging unless asked. It generally
masks the real issue.
> #Here is the lo
On 5/22/2012 10:33 AM, varad gupta wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
> I need to replace all occurences of "text1" in mailbody with "text2".
>
> The regexp =>
>
> /^(.*)text1(.*)$/ REPLACE $1text2$2 works if there is only one
> occurence of "text1" in a line.
>
> It changes only the last occurence of "text1" in
On 5/16/2012 2:07 PM, James Lay wrote:
> On May 16, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> The answer to that question can be found in "man 5 transport".
>> However, you don't want to mess around with a reject-users table in
>> the first place (particularly not as a transport map). Instead jus
On 5/16/2012 7:15 AM, James Lay wrote:
> Postfix appears to discard the entire email. Is there a way to change this
> behavior so postfix would still send to the two good addresses, but discard
> the one that matches?
>
> In my real world setup, my reject-users is alphabetical…I've seen emails t
On 5/15/2012 9:44 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:17:16AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
>> # Allow maximum mail size 40GB
>> message_size_limit = 4048
> The comment is wrong. 4048 is only 40MB. Good, because most sites
> will not accept any multi-GB mail.
In addition, be car
On 4/17/2012 3:55 PM, n756...@50mail.com wrote:
>
> FROM: "n###@###.com"
> TO: b...@domain.com, m...@domain.com
>
> For that message send, postfix logs on my end show:
>
> Apr 17 11:52:48 mail postfix/smtpd[23367]: connect from
> smtp.myprovider.com[1.2.3.4]
> Apr 17 11:52:48
On 4/13/2012 1:27 PM, Kizito Thomas wrote:
> Thank you Ansgar,
> Does it mean I cannot use this method to block un desirable mails this
> way?
> At first I tried using the method explained on
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-blacklist-reject-sender-email-address/
> but this could not allow post
On 4/3/2012 9:32 AM, Kizito Thomas wrote:
> Dear good people,
> I am trying out Mailscanner for the first time in my life, I have this
> test postfix server that has been working properly until when I added
> a line:
> /**/
>
I highly recommend to use amavisd-new instead of Mailscanner.
The former
On 3/29/2012 6:56 AM, Phill Edwards wrote:
>
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > permit_mynetworks, check_relay_domains
>
> You'll want a reject_unauth_destination after these.
>
>
> Sorry but I don't have any idea what that means. Could you please
> explai
On 3/28/2012 5:19 AM, Priscilla V wrote:
> We have configured to consider ldap users also in /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I'm not an LDAP expert, but it seems as if you are looking up a full
email address.
Please be aware that alias_maps lookups only send the bare user name.
Queries targeting "j...@exampl
On 3/21/2012 2:31 PM, Mark S wrote:
> there is one comma missing after reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, that's
> fixed of course.
Commas are treated the same as whitespace to Postfix. They are not
required.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Mark S
> To: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
>
On 3/5/2012 1:08 PM, James Chase wrote:
> Is there any postfix configuration that will allow rejected mail to be
> viewed or mail from a certain user to be saved despite reject/accept
> status for debugging? Postfix is blocking an incoming message saying
>
> mx1 postfix/cleanup[7139]: 6F3FBE4079:
On 3/1/2012 11:49 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure
>>> out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of
>>> messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant
>>> delivery delays for all mail.
>> Is it
On 2/28/2012 1:54 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2012 12:25 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
>> Welcome to Postfix.
>>
On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
Welcome to Postfix.
>
> One of the basic questions I have is this:
>
> I'm wanting to use bl.spamcop.net. From what I can discern, I've got
> to put this in my main.cf in a section named
> smtpd
On 2/16/2012 2:15 PM, Toomas Vendelin wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have set up a home e-mail server with Postfix and Cyrus, and
> everything seems to work. There is one matter I'd like to clarify,
> though.
> Is it so, that if I use "non-Postfix" virtual mail delivery (in my
> case, to Cyrus accounts
On 2/15/2012 11:57 AM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
> On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>>> I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table
>>> inside a MySQL database. It's basically a list of users that
On 2/8/2012 12:07 PM, Mr fix wrote:
> Just tried that brute force and worked.your reference validates the issue.
>
> These things generally happen when we jump 4 versions in one shot, thank you
> very much for pitching in.
>
> We have multiple instances running so as per older way they distrib
On 1/31/2012 9:54 AM, Eric Jacobs wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I'm new to postfix. Been working with sendmail forever but for a new
> mailserver my boss (actually his boss) has a thing for postfix and
> against sendmail. So I'm scrambling to learn.
>
> One thing that has come up is that in the near fut
On 1/18/2012 12:10 PM, Jon August wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have a postfix machin
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
>>
>> and we would like to use a t
On 12/13/2011 2:17 PM, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not too familiar with postfix but our server seems to stop sending
> emails usually only on the weekends. The rest of the week it's fine
> but once it gets to about Saturday/Sunday morning it gets stuck. I've
> come in usually on Mond
On 12/8/2011 2:17 PM, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_auth_destination,
This restriction at this location will IGNORE all RBL lookups when mail
is destined for your system.
I suggest removing it as it is implied if reject_unauth_de
und so far are with Cyrus or
> Dovecot.
>
> P.
The Postfix documentation is quite extensive on this subject.
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_sasl
Brian
>
>
> ----- Αρχικό μήνυμα -
> Απο: Brian Evans - Postfix List
> Προς: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
On 11/30/2011 12:55 PM, Peter Tselios wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I would to like to enable SMTP authentication, as an option feature for our
> users, but I have some questions before doing so.
> 1st: Is it possible to enable it, without Cyrus of Dovecot? I do not want to
> install Cyrus of Dovecot on my
On 11/22/2011 6:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Mark Goodge :
>> I am suffering from AOL numpties who click "this is spam" on
>> notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and
>> mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up
>> a feedback loop with AOL
On 11/18/2011 8:45 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Is it possible to have postfix log to be written in database instead
> of file? If it’s not possible could I copy some information out of log
> file and then insert them in database?
>
>
As reported to you twice in the past week, Postfix lo
On 11/15/2011 3:48 PM, Justin wrote:
> New to postfix please bare with us. :)
>
> We like to accept special characters in email id so surrounding the
> email names with "", but still these emails are sent to fallback maildir.
>
> Followed this man page --> http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html
> T
On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working fine
but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the
other instance .
How can I do that?
Regards
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#syslog_name
Rea
On 11/3/2011 9:32 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi I am just trying to run policyd-spf and postgrey. However whatever I do I
> seem to get errors of the form:
>
> [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# postfix reload
> postfix: fatal: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf, line 227: missing
On 10/10/2011 2:32 PM, Erik Christiansson wrote:
> I'm trying to get postgrey up and running, but I seem to have a
> problem with the ordering of my restrictions.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks,
> reject_invalid_helo_hostn
On 10/5/2011 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
>
> My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot resend them
> because it seems that postfix want to use a content filter I alread
> disabled.
> The old line in master.cf
On 9/2/2011 1:25 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> But it seems the smtpd_tls_protocols/ciphers directives are specific to 2.6?
>
> Is there any way to disable SSLv2 in postfix 2.3?
>
> I have to stick to the CentOS package so that I get updates.
There are alternative packages to the Cen
On 9/2/2011 12:28 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If
> I do the following:
>
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high
>
> but despite the fact that this configuration has b
On 9/2/2011 11:53 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
> Output of postconf -n
>
> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
[cut]
> mydestination = localhost
[cut]
> relay_domains =
[cut]
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
> virtual_gid_maps = static:501
> virtual_mailb
On 8/30/2011 4:32 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 16:08:35 schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> According to the sources (2.8.4 as a reference),
>> mailbox_size_limit is a signed 32-bit integer. (On x86(_64) arch)
>>
>> global/mail
On 8/30/2011 3:23 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
> # postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
> mailbox_size_limit = 4294967296
>
> I tried reducing the number which worked and the errors siappeared:
>
> # postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
> mailbox_size_limit = 20
>
> What could be the cause to
On 8/17/2011 1:47 PM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> This policy is mistaken for the following reasons.
> Doesn't that make the whole ipv6whitelist.eu initiave "mistaken"?
> Or could there be a correct way to use it?
>
> As a side note: they do explain how to enable their whitelist
On 8/11/2011 8:56 AM, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
> Something like this:
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = silent-discard, etrn, dsn
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords_auth = silent-discard, etrn
>
> Not sure if SMTP protocol would support it though...
>
One problem with this, AUTH happens AFTER EHLO.
On 8/8/2011 2:29 PM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
> Hello everyone. I've been searching around trying to figure this out
> but it just eluding me. We've been getting a ton of mail from a
> certain domain which is all spam. Problem is that our mail system is
> also generating a bounce for each try. I w
On 8/5/2011 9:34 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6.I have configured
> postfix to server 2 virtual domains and now I need to use mailing
> list. I installed mailman-2.1.9-6.el5_6.1 when I add the virtual
> domain to /etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py and ru
On 7/25/2011 6:17 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
> hi all;
> I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6,dovecot-1.2.17-0_115.el5 on centos
> 5.6.I have two domains and iam using virtual domains the problem is
> one domain is working fin ewhile the other can't send mail when i
> check for mx record it can't reach
On 7/12/2011 4:34 PM, jeffrey starin wrote:
> I don't know where you saw 2.3.3 but will nevertheless take your
> suggestions and re-install.
I hope you read my comments made 8 hours ago before you do this. It is
probably not necessary.
(Archive: http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=13104744202876
On 7/12/2011 12:16 AM, jeffrey starin wrote:
> I am trying to use the smtp_bind_address command so that three
> seperate ips can be used for 3 separate clients who are using email
> campaign software as explained in this howto:
> http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/01/02/postfix-bind-sender-domain-to-d
On 7/8/2011 4:43 PM, Jeffrey Starin wrote:
> On 7/8/2011 4:39 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> On 2011-07-08 22:37, Jeffrey Starin wrote:
>>> On 7/8/2011 4:21 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-07-08 21:06, Jeffrey Starin wrote:
> When I turn off the firewall (which I am loath to do) to my VPS
On 6/24/2011 11:14 AM, Jon Miller wrote:
>
> When I see mail trying to come in I get an error such as:
>
> Jun 24 23:01:08 mmtlnx postfix/smtpd[27237]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from mail.domain3.com.au[203.161.81.22]: 554
> : Client host rejected: Access
> denied; from= to=
> proto=ESMTP helo=
>
> J
On 6/24/2011 9:45 AM, Jon Miller wrote:
> It was already off.
>
> --master.cf--
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup
> cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup
> qmgr fifo n
On 6/9/2011 4:09 PM, Dragan Zubac wrote:
> Hello
>
> Sorry,I'll try to report a problem again following your instructions.
>
> Summary
>
> I'm trying to achieve the following :
>
> - email arrives
> - postfix checks the sender address
> - postfix looks up username/password and relay host for that s
On 6/8/2011 8:35 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
> Steve Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> It's http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
> Oh, thanks. The maintainer must have renamed it.
>
> I don't know if the author reads this, but I'd suggest a smallish change
> for the next release: Put only REJECT alone on each lin
On 5/27/2011 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin"
>>> instead using "ali
On 5/27/2011 10:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hm - has anybody an idea why the following message is expanded to "myorigin"
> instead using "alias_maps" and relay to the external address?
> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ postconf -n alias_maps
> alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-aliases.cf
>
> [root
On 5/16/2011 1:23 PM, John Nichel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Long time qmail user now migrating to Postfix (old guy who doesn’t
> like change J ). I have my Postfix server set up to the point where it
> is sending and receiving mail properly but I’m wondering if there is a
> configuration setting where I c
On 4/28/2011 2:56 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
> Thanks Raindl,
> Problem was fixed; but I don't want to open my spam filter server to
> spammers. Do you think that is a DNS configuration issue on our client's
> DNS? When I issue the following command on the spam filter server
> # nslookup client.ip.add
On 4/20/2011 5:28 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> thanks to all who replied. i still can't manage it.
>
> i'm still getting msgs to
> u...@ns8.arlut.utexas.edu
> rejected as user unknown in relay recipient table.
>
>
>
> postconf -n
>
> relay_domains = arlut.utexas.edu
> relay_recipient_maps = h
On 4/20/2011 12:01 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> hi,
>
> here's my problem, which i think i cannot do w/in postfix.
>
> i'm going to have to allow mail to get delivered (in principle,
> not in fact) to all machines of the form
> *.arlut.utexas.edu
> i'm partly unable, partly unwilling to generate
On 3/25/2011 11:12 AM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
> On Friday 25 March 2011 11:01:58 Wietse Venema wrote:
>> You must first fix the problem with SENDING MAIL to the REMOTE SERVER.
>> The REMOTE SERVER is not on localhost port 25.
> ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviousl
On 3/22/2011 2:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> Yes, the web pages linked directly from the Postfix site are outdated,
>> but not the link referenced there (in the blog area) and above.
>> This includes RPMs for x86_64 for RHEL5 as well as SRPMS
On 3/22/2011 1:18 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
>>
>> There are reliable (S)RPM packages available for RHEL 5 that will get
>> you to the parameters/functionality you need.
>> The most common is by Si
On 3/22/2011 8:33 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> Your solution seems to be a very good one, but unfortunately that
> default_destination_rate_delay parameter is not available in the
> postfix version I'm running (2.3). I'm using the postfix
> implementation shipped with
On 2/11/2011 3:38 PM, Alan Batie wrote:
> I've discovered something odd: permit_mynetworks seems to be allowing
> invalid addresses in rather than just allowing relaying. The symptom is
> that if I connect from a local client, any rcpt to is accepted; if I
> connect from a non-local client, it's p
On 2/9/2011 11:33 AM, Reid Thompson wrote:
> sending mail with mutt started failing yesterday with:
> postdrop: fatal: getrlimit: Operation not permitted
> sendmail: warning: command "/usr/sbin/postdrop -r" exited with status 1
> sendmail: fatal: rthompso(303): unable to execute /usr/sbin/postdrop
issues - just
> tried to find my way through using as much documentation as I could.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>
> On 7/2/2011 7:04 μμ, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> allowed_list1= cidr:/etc/postfix/client.cidr,reject
>> Do you see the HUGE difference b
On 2/7/2011 10:15 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using this piece of code to restrict access to some mail aliases
> (only clients from the allowed IP addresses are permitted to send
> email to the protected email addresses):
>
>smtpd_restriction_classes = allowed_list1
>allowed_li
On 2/4/2011 2:59 PM, Julien Vehent wrote:
> But, if I do the same on submission port 587, I get an 'Undelivered
> Mail Returned to Sender' containing the following:
>
> --
> : host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said:
> 550-Mailbox unknown.
> Either there is no mailbox associated with this 550-na
On 2/4/2011 10:50 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
> Sure, thank's a lot everybody, i think the problem is related to:
>
> warning: mysql query failed: Illegal mix of collations
> (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE)
> operation '='
> that cause
>
> warning: transport_maps lookup
On 2/3/2011 3:34 AM, Aggelos wrote:
> on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
>> Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
>>> on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
>>>
With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
which would other
On 2/1/2011 7:43 AM, sunhux G wrote:
>
> Our current way of blocking a spam address is by editing
> access_sender & access_recipient & then reload postmap.
>
> From time to time we're given addresses that should never
> be blocked but due to staff turnover & documentation not
> up-to-date, an addre
On 1/28/2011 12:51 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
> We want the headers to correct show the mail system, with a bug in
> centos, it shows localhost or 127.0.0.1 where it should show
> mail.sheltoncomputers.com for PROPER, correct tracking.
>
> /etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre:
>
> s/(127\.0\.0\.1|localho
On 1/12/2011 11:00 AM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> With Postfix set up by default, it will send a bounce message to sender
> if it cannot deliver the message. But I can create SPAM message with
> some innocent sender address and send to Postfix. Then, the innocent
> sender will get undelivere
On 1/12/2011 9:50 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> My Postfix server wont allow SMTP from my web server (running
> RoundCube webmail) which happens to be on the same network / subnet as
> my Postfix mail server. My mail server is running only Postfix &
> Dovecot while my web server has Apache, RoundCube
On 12/17/2010 4:13 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva
wrote:
sum changes is main.postfix file
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.200
In my '/etc/postfix/mynetworks' file I have the following:
127.0.0.0/8
192.168.0.0/24
In my '/et
On 12/17/2010 3:02 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
So I finally got around to getting a web server stood up on VMware so
that I can implement 'webmail' for my mail server. I'm using Postfix
2.7.1-2 and my servers are configured as follows:
mail = 192.168.0.200 /
web = 192.168.0.201 /
Now when my webm
On 12/6/2010 3:31 PM, John Adams wrote:
Hi
I host several domains on my mail system. The various domains all have
their own dedicated spamassassin blacklist. Because spamassassin's
blacklist implementation is not waterproof (if message size > spamc -s
$size, let mail pass unchecked), I want t
On 12/2/2010 1:14 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
Hello All,
I have a mail server (postfix 2.2.10, Devecot, IMSS/SPS 7.0).
Note: this is quite old. While considered stable, it will be no longer
updated.
I noticed recently that some emails are delivered with very late (some
hours, one or 2
On 12/2/2010 10:08 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/02/2010 09:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In order for this to work, you should add non-local user aliases to
virtual_alias_maps using the fully qualified addresses on both the
left and right sides.
virtual_alias_maps are global
On 12/2/2010 9:32 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 for a domain 'mydomain.com' with some users
hosted locally (with Cyrus IMAP) and some others are hosted by a MS
Exchange server.
I configured a transport map for all users that need to be relayed to
the MS exchange like th
On 11/30/2010 11:49 AM, Dan wrote:
On freebsd 8.0: standard install from ports collection:
1) virtual_gid_maps problems #GID does not appear to be working
virtual_gid_maps= mysql:$config_directory/mysql_gids.cf
#virtual_gid_maps= static:2001
Instead of quoting sections of main.
On 11/30/2010 10:27 AM, Gustavo Villaran wrote:
Hi, i just installed postfix on my company and is working fine, now
the company management has asked me to
implement a group security model that i dont know if i could do it in
postfix, it goes like this :
1. We want to have a group of persons th
On 11/24/2010 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
No.. it's [transport-name]_destination_rate_delay. "slowdown" is the
transport in this example.
This allows processes such as qmgr to control things per transport (a
feature of Postfix 2.5+)
Please ignore the "feature
On 11/24/2010 3:22 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List put forth on 11/24/2010 7:54 AM:
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
-o transport_destination_rate_delay = 16s
It's worth noting that transport_destination_rate_delay is implemented
in qmgr and not the smtp c
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Avinash Pawar // Viva put forth on 11/24/2010 4:48 AM:
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On hour
On 11/17/2010 12:12 PM, Jack wrote:
I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't
like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list.
The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any non-zero
bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23 below).
I.e.
On 11/17/2010 11:54 AM, Jack wrote:
Hello All,
I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like
certain IP blocks in my CIDR list.
I'm wondering if it doesn't like the 4th octet of the IP's being a zero.
Any help appreciated!
Here is a small piece of the log file:
The
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
