On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 5:29 PM raf wrote:
Maybe in terms of money, but that's not the only consideration.
> If a mail server cannot (for any of a number of reasons) fire up
> a web server for LetsEncrypt domain ownership verification, then
> it gets more complicated
A DNS based challenge is als
kent676.kent.gov.uk
*** Can't find kent676.kent.gov.uk: No answer
I guess this is just "wrong" in that there should be an A or MX record.
Are the allowed DNS record types for reject_unknown_sender_domain
configurable ?
Should they be ? I guess in this case the servers generate mail only.
Cheers
Brett
e.com AND ip is a.b.c.d,
THEN allow loose recipient ?
in short :
can we do and queries and bind several different (sender|recipient)_checks with
an AND logic ?
can we configure some classes of failures, such as dns, to fail more quickly ?
Cheers
Brett
> On 15 Jun 2017, at 4:42 pm, Domini
a different solution. Probably simpler to keep
using your same product, if they fix the empty base search.
Cheers
Brett
> I’ve notified them about this, but I guess if can workaround it in postfix….
> it seems not.
>
> Regards,
> Paolo.
>
>>> On 4 Apr 2017, at 12:22, Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>
>>> Paolo Barbato wrote:
>>> postmap: warning: dict_ldap_lookup
-q as that
does what postfix does
server configuration error means the ldap query is failing entirely, not that
the email is not found, so its something that caused the query to fail, a
successful query succeeds but return 0 results, not an error, which is what you
are getting..
Cheers
Brett
sorbs is not always a consistent organization, both listing and delisting can
be chaotic, i don't think they have a policy based system, it has in the past
been based on reporting that is vetted only sporadically, you'd think mozilla
would only use dnsbl from larger organisations with a policy
emails and log failures, but not actually reject mail.
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/wily/man5/policyd-spf.conf.5.htm
Cheers
Brett
downside is at
first, my user base sometimes locked themselves out. I have white listed
the main IP addresses my clients use. After about 6 months, the users
have become better about logging in, and I haven't had a lock out
complaint since.
Cheers,
Dimitar
---
Brett
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Brett @Google:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> > libra
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
>
> > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
&
DEF_QUEUE_DIR=\"/data/postfix/spool\"
-DDEF_SENDMAIL_PATH=\"/usr/local/postfix/sbin/sendmail\"
-DDEF_SHLIB_DIR=\"/usr/local/postfix/libexec\"
-DDEF_MANPAGE_DIR=\"/usr/local/postfix/man\" -DUSE_DYNAMIC_LIBS
-DUSE_DYNAMIC_MAPS $(WARN)
...etc
WARN= -w
Cheers
Brett
--
Yesterday is history and tomorrow is a mystery, the gift is now which is
why it is called the present..
towards overriding or conflicting directives and can't think of any.
Suggestions are appreciated - much obliged,
Brett
be expected?
Thanks in advance for your help!
--
Brett
really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a
> buffoon Victor. Is there someone willing to help? Please?
You're being berated because there is specific documentation for this
simple, common task.
Brett
15 matches
Mail list logo
