[pfx] Re: Problems Receiving Email But Only from Microsoft/Outlook [lost connection after EHLO]

2024-12-02 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, Tim Harman via Postfix-users wrote: I'm fairly sure this is a Microsoft problem, but I'm asking anyway in case I'm doing something really dumb. I've noticed that in the last month I can't receive email from people using Office 365 hosted email. So, quite a few people. Th

[pfx] Re: Recommendation for dkim signing

2023-10-30 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote: We are looking into implementing DKIM signing for one of our services, and there are multiple ways to implement that. So far I have found that you can do it with opendkim and amavis - any recommendation for one or the other, or mayb

[pfx] Re: server does not pick up new certificates

2023-07-24 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users: On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On 23 Jul 2023, at 4:21 pm, Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users wrote: In the case of the dehydrated ACME client (https://github.com

[pfx] Re: server does not pick up new certificates

2023-07-24 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On 23 Jul 2023, at 4:21 pm, Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users wrote: In the case of the dehydrated ACME client (https://github.com/dehydrated-io/dehydrated) there's an option to run a bunch of commands on successful update, incl

[pfx] Re: delivery loop?

2023-05-22 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 22 May 2023, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: Given the case that: 1. postfix is a backup MX for foo.com 2. this postfix uses other MTA as relay_host When the primary MX for foo.com is down, messages to u...@foo.com will be delivered into backup MX. And, backup MX delivers the message

[pfx] Re: E-mail delivery problem

2023-05-02 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Tue, 2 May 2023, Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users wrote: [very good information and advice] Just show/check the output of "ip a" if you are on Linux, please, you will be surprised. Maybe also add "ip r", as this would clarify whether the default route is the VPN or not (and apparentl

[pfx] Re: Painful Postfix

2023-05-01 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote: When I open a raw socket to the remote server on port 25 using telnet, I am able to connect and see the server announce itself, so, it is reasonable to assume that Postfix is doing the same and timing out during the SMTP transaction becau

[pfx] Re: tls_high_cipherlist parameter

2023-05-01 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote: Hello   Postfix's documentation for the tls_high_cipherlist parameter states to see the output of the command 'postconf -d' to see the default setting. Sadly, the documentation lacks specificness, and the output spit out about 500 lines

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-29 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Ken Peng via Postfix-users wrote: Nope. I found that if I enabled protocol test, every provider including gmail/orange/vodafone sending messages to me will get response code 450. After I disabled those protocol test, everything goes fine. So what's the correct way to deal

[pfx] Re: postscreen question

2023-04-29 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Ken Peng via Postfix-users wrote: Hello When I enabled postscreen, why even gmail's sender IP was greylisted? Did you expect or configure to deal with gmail differently? The log says: Apr 29 15:35:35 mxin postfix/postscreen[59408]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [209.85.16

[pfx] Re: DNS resolvers difference for RBL checks

2023-04-10 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: I have two debian boxes, one is running unbound for dns resolver, another is running systemd-resolve. [..] Checking for RBL on first node is successful: [..] But second is not: [..] Can you tell me why? unbound will, per default, reso

[pfx] Re: Allow TLSv1 only for internal senders

2023-03-23 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote: [...] (That is pretty off-topic for postfix; except maybe for fun posting my SMTP related firewall [...] add_rule -p tcp --src ${addr}${mask} \ --dport ${p_smtp} -m limit --limit 60/m -j

[P-U] Re: Postfix lists are migrating to a new list server

2023-03-08 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote: On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote: On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote: So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian? rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMAR

[P-U] Re: Postfix lists are migrating to a new list server

2023-03-07 Thread Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote: So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian? rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so far ;-) Good luck. ___ Postfix-us