[pfx] Re: relay specific domain

2024-01-24 Thread Barbara M. via Postfix-users
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Barbara M. via Postfix-users: Jan 23 00:11:34 auth postfix/smtpd[188544]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from wp-host1.xyz.com[4.3.2.1]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= It this is this an INTERNAL DESTINATION

[pfx] relay specific domain

2024-01-22 Thread Barbara M. via Postfix-users
I have an smtp server that I use as smtp relay for some internal mail server and as smtp authenticate for some users. I have the enabled sender IPs in network_table I have the enabled users as system users in passwd/shadow Inserting my local domains (hosted in another internal server), in the

Re: queue "manipulation"

2018-11-29 Thread Barbara M.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: # postconf |grep limitrec limitrecip_destination_recipient_limit = 3 * Evidence that the nexthop destination domain (not the MX host, but the envelope recipient domain) is routed to the "limitrecip" transport. In transport file: yahoo.com

Re: queue "manipulation"

2018-11-28 Thread Barbara M.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: then "postfix reload" to refresh the queue manager. Same result (it tried to deliver all the 7 address of the message flushed for test). # postconf |grep limitrec limitrecip_destination_recipient_limit = 3 What are I missing? Thanks for you pa

Re: queue "manipulation"

2018-11-28 Thread Barbara M.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Thanks for replay. The box is a standard "CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)" Postfix standard (RH): postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64 I inserted in master.cf (last row): limitrecip unix - - n - - smtp -o default_destinati

Re: queue "manipulation"

2018-11-28 Thread Barbara M.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Wietse Venema wrote: . . . Is there a way to say Postfix to resend messages in the queue (for this destination), few recipients at the time (or one by one)? N.B.: tried to play with default_destination_recipient_limit, This is the parameter that limits the number of re

queue "manipulation"

2018-11-28 Thread Barbara M.
Hi, I have a little mailserver (MailMan). It works fine, except for yahoo subscribers. While the almost totallity of subscribers receive their messages in less then a hour, in my queue remains (often until expire of queue_lifetime), with this messages: (host mx-eu.mail.am0.yahoodns.net[1

Re: RegExp help

2015-05-14 Thread Barbara M.
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Tom Hendrikx wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 14-05-15 12:48, Barbara M. wrote: I am trying to use regexp to block mails from specific domains to specific users (and let other users receive it). I need to merge (logical AND operator), something

Re: RegExp help

2015-05-14 Thread Barbara M.
ind how to improve the AND condition. Tried solutions like: /.*\@.*domainsource.tld.*\@.*domaindest.tld/ REJECT /.*\@.*domaindest.tld.*\@.*domainsource.tld/ without success. Surely it is a trivial trick that I don't see :-( Thanks, B. On May 14, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Barbara M.

RegExp help

2015-05-14 Thread Barbara M.
I am trying to use regexp to block mails from specific domains to specific users (and let other users receive it). I need to merge (logical AND operator), something like: /^From:.*\@.*domainsource.tld/ REJECT No Unrequested mail Please /^To:.*\@.*domaindest.tld/ REJECT No Unreques

Re: block local sender

2013-08-23 Thread Barbara M.
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Wietse Venema wrote: Barbara M.: smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access That is for mail received via SMTP. In your case use authorized_submit_users instead. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#authorized_submit_users

block local sender

2013-08-23 Thread Barbara M.
Probably trivial, but I am in holiday and using an emergency connection, so I ask instead of searching again. Problem: a website in a multidomain server is spamming probably due to a bug in the site code. The owners are also in holiday; I can't stop the website; I can't stop postfix :-( All

Re: Name resolution

2012-05-22 Thread Barbara M.
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Wietse Venema wrote: Barbara M.: Thanks. I put: smtp_host_lookup = native, dns In my idea this give higher priority to /etc/hosts Postfix works as documented. See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_host_lookup Then search for any text that promises that

Re: Name resolution

2012-05-22 Thread Barbara M.
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.05.2012 12:15, schrieb Barbara M.: # telnet mail.aaa.tld 25 Trying 192.168.1.25... Connected to mail.aaa.tld. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.aaa.tld ESMTP . . . . but Postfix seems to still search the real IP via DNS. Why?

Name resolution

2012-05-22 Thread Barbara M.
How work name resolution in Postfix? I have an internal server that resend mail to another box (in the same IntraNet). If I put in my local /etc/hosts something like: 192.168.1.25mail.aaa.tld the box do what I want: # ping mail.aaa.tld PING mail.aaa.tld (192.168.1.25) 56(84) bytes of data

Re: mail date/time

2012-01-15 Thread Barbara M.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Wietse Venema wrote: Barbara M.: There is a settings/parameter that fix the date/time of a mail to the time I start to compose it or when I sent it? I noticied some differences after update of a server from 2.2 to 2.6. Postfix 2.2 cron Job give this mail: - Date

mail date/time

2012-01-15 Thread Barbara M.
There is a settings/parameter that fix the date/time of a mail to the time I start to compose it or when I sent it? I noticied some differences after update of a server from 2.2 to 2.6. Postfix 2.2 cron Job give this mail: - Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 04:20:50 From: Cron Daemon To: ro

Re: strange log issue

2012-01-09 Thread Barbara M.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Jim Seymour wrote: On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:41:07 +0100 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: [snip] "delay=0," changed into "delay=0.04, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.02," Did you update pflogsumm as well? Yup. You need Pflogsumm-1.1.1, at least, looks like. 1.1.3 has been released for nearl

Re: strange log issue

2012-01-08 Thread Barbara M.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Jim Seymour wrote: On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:04:18 +0100 (CET) "Barbara M." wrote: After upgrading my old box (Postfix 2.2 on CentOS 4.x), to postfix-2.6.9-1.rhel4, I noticied this strange issue in my daily pflogsum (and others), log analisys report: [snip]

Re: strange log issue

2012-01-08 Thread Barbara M.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, /dev/rob0 wrote: Mails are delivered to the mailboxes, but seems something is changed in the logging that give this result. Probably right. Any hints? It's impossible to say without seeing the actual logs, but you are showing no special syslog_* settings in your postcon

strange log issue

2012-01-08 Thread Barbara M.
After upgrading my old box (Postfix 2.2 on CentOS 4.x), to postfix-2.6.9-1.rhel4, I noticied this strange issue in my daily pflogsum (and others), log analisys report: Grand Totals messages 2449 received 0 delivered 0 forwarded 0 deferred 0 b

Upgrade ...

2011-12-29 Thread Barbara M.
I read the already suggested: http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5- from-source/ My current situation is: - Old server CentOS 4.x based (Postfix 2.2) I want to migrate to a new CentOS 6.x (Postfix 2.6) My plan is to update Postfix (and dovecot, procmail)