Does it work on an air gapped intranet?

2014-04-15 Thread Angus March
I'm looking for an MTA that will work on an air gapped intranet. If the network is small enough, can this be done w/out a DNS?

Re: proper way to handle error from sendmail front-end in C

2009-11-10 Thread Angus March
Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:22:47PM -0500, Angus March wrote: > > >> And finally, what was sent to the standard error: >> sendmail: warning: -f option specified malformed sender: angus uducat.com >> sendmail: fatal: No recipient addres

Re: proper way to handle error from sendmail front-end in C

2009-11-10 Thread Angus March
Wietse Venema wrote: > Angus March: > >>> No, that was a WARNING. >>> >>> warning: -f option specified malformed sender >>> >>> If there is an ERROR, the Postfix sendmail command will NOT enqueue >>> the message, and it will retur

[Fwd: Re: proper way to handle error from sendmail front-end in C]

2009-11-10 Thread Angus March
--- Begin Message --- Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:54:10AM -0500, Angus March wrote: > > >> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv() >> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which >&

Re: proper way to handle error from sendmail front-end in C

2009-11-10 Thread Angus March
Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:54:10AM -0500, Angus March wrote: > > >> I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv() >> (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which >> diligently che

proper way to handle error from sendmail front-end in C

2009-11-10 Thread Angus March
I have a C program that calls Postfix's sendmail front-end using execv() (after calling fork()). I also have a waitpid() on the process, which diligently checks the status value returned by sendmail. I tried to sabotage an e-mail by inserting a sender that is un-RFC822, and there were errors sent