So it's hardware and not the Unix cache/buffers that keep things in RAM to
improve performance.
Thank you for clarifying!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Bourgeois:
> > But what does "persistent write cache" mean? What needs to be cha
But what does "persistent write cache" mean? What needs to be changed on
the OS level? Google doesn't clearly link "persistent write cache" to a
Linux feature.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:16 PM, wrote:
>
> Zitat von Andrew Bourgeois :
>
>
> Hello
>&
Hello
What does "Speed up disk updates with a large (64MB) persistent write
cache." mean (source: http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html)?
Does this talk about the "dirty ratio" or is it something else? Google
didn't help me on this one.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards
Andrew
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Bourgeois:
> > Hello
> >
> > stress tests indicate that Postfix 2.8.8 behaves differently when using
> > "postqueue -i" compared to "postqueue -f" when it comes to handling
> &
Hello
stress tests indicate that Postfix 2.8.8 behaves differently when using
"postqueue -i" compared to "postqueue -f" when it comes to handling
deferred e-mail.
When using "postqueue -i" in a loop, deferred e-mail goes through the
incoming queue before going through the active queue.
When usin
