Am 25.05.17 14:20 schrieb(en) spamv...@googlemail.com:
since three days I'm trying to remove my internal and external IP from the
Message header when I'm sending mails. But no solution has worked so far.
What I did:
created a new service in master.cf
A simpler solution (working for me) for al
Hi all,
please excuse me for a rather ot question - I need an environment for testing
GSSAPI Kerberos SASL authentication of a MUA to a MTA. I know postfix does
support it, but setting up kerberos properly is a pita...
Does anyone know about a pre-configured postfix (and maybe additionally do
Am 16.07.16 21:30 schrieb(en) Sebastian Nielsen:
You could use iptables to look for:
"--BEGIN"
"--END"
"/signed"
"/encrypted"
"/pkcs7"
"/pgp"
Anywhere in the packet. In that case, you drop the connection, send a RST
IMO this is too restrictive as it would produce false positives, e.g. for you
Am 16.07.16 15:59 schrieb(en) Michael Fox:
So, are there other obvious ways to recognize encrypted contents, other than
"Content-Type: multipart/encrypted"?
Basically, you need to check for
- OpenPGP/Inline (inspect every body, see rfc 2440, sect. 6.2)
- OpenPGP/Mime (multipart/encrypted, see r
Am 30.03.15 21:49 schrieb(en) Wietse Venema:
b) Use check_sasl_access table that replies with "FILTER smtp:[host]:port".
This requires Postfix 2.11 or later.
Updated my Debian box from backports to 2.11 - and this method works just
perfectly!
Thanks a lot,
Albrecht.
pgpEa_vjFDJYE.pgp
Descri
Hi all,
the subject says it all - it is possible to use a specific transport for
sasl-authenticated users, similar to sender_dependent_default_transport_maps,
with postfix 2.9? The use case is to transmit all messages from
sasl-authenticated senders only to a different machine where they shal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 13.06.14 21:16 schrieb(en) Wietse Venema:
That requires a header_checks "ignore" action, with regular expression that
contains your Postfix host in the place of *myhostname*, and wildcards in the place for
*helo_name* and *client_name*, and some
Hi all,
I have a question about "indirectly" resolving posix group mail addresses to
users through OpenLDAP.
I use a setup where (inter alia) in OpenLDAP every user has a posixAccount and
every group is a posixGroup. Every group has a mail address, and messages sent
to the group shall be sen