As of the 22 Feb 2024 I have been seeing invalid MAIL FROM address from
Microsoft:
In: MAIL FROM: XATTRDIRECT=Originating
XATTRORGID=xorgid:96f9e21d-a1c4-44a3-99e4-37191ac61848
Clearly an issue with line termination, but one I have yet to find
reported online.
I have seen a couple o
On 19/11/2023 06:24, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:33:46PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG via
Postfix-users wrote:
or if you prefer:
_25._tcp.mx1.org.example. IN CNAME _25._tlsa.org.example.
_25._tcp.mx2.org.example. IN CNAME _25._tlsa.org.example.
On 05/03/15 08:37, Michael wrote:
Hi,
because Postfix 2.11 config has been blocking legitimate servers in the
past, I added a white list before the reject_rbl_client listings.
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_dnswl_client list.dnswl.org,
reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
On 15/01/15 02:16, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone running Postfix 2.11 on an f21 machine? I'm using it and am
using postscreen which I really like. The system firewall is FirewallD
and I'm using fail2ban 0.9.1 to block brute force bot hits on the
machine. I've got the jail Fail2ban for Pos
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 08/02/14 03:21:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:49:55PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Does this imply that, for users like me, the "Getting started, quick
and dirty" section of the Postfix TLS support could be further
simplified?
Yes. I did not
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 07/02/14 23:13:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:40:37PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Should not be too hard. In your case, as I suggested upstream, a
simple self-signed certificate with no issuing CA is quite sufficient:
Assuming a suitable private key in
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 07/02/14 19:07:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 05:37:16PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
>> I did try CA:FALSE but this was causing outlook.com mail to fail
>> (and, as Viktor stated, mail from other domains as well).
>
> Usually, the CA certificat
Alan Munday wrote the following on 06/02/14 17:37:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 20:44:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:28:51PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 18:45:
And of course mx3 is still broken, STARTTLS hangs, because it is
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 20:44:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:28:51PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 18:45:
Now for the record your leaf certificate is also a CA, which is
harmless I imagine, but keep that in mind if you run into
Alan Munday wrote the following on 05/02/14 21:29:
Rather than tie up peoples time is there a reference I can go to and
I'll work through things from scratch.
And replying to my own question, I've found the TLS-README...
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 20:44:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:28:51PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 18:45:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:07:27PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Feb 5 16:01:21 mx1 postfix/smtpd[22789]:
Anonymous TLS
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 18:45:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:07:27PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Feb 5 16:01:21 mx1 postfix/smtpd[22789]:
Anonymous TLS connection established
from mail-db3lp0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com[213.199.154.84]:
TLSv1 with cipher
Viktor Dukhovni wrote the following on 05/02/14 18:45:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:07:27PM +, Alan Munday wrote:
Viktor
Thank you. I'll work through the points you've highlighted.
Alan
I found a problem in my logs with respect to receiving email from
outlook.com. When I looked into it I thought it was due to the TLS certs
having expired. I've created new certificates (self-signed) but the
problem is continuing.
I'm seeing trusted/untrusted/anonymous connections established
Manuel Bieling wrote the following on 07/10/13 12:45:
Wietse explained this a few weeks ago:
/etc/postfix/transport:
example.comsmtp-ipv4-only:
example.net smtp-upv6-only:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
smtp-ipv4-only unix - - n - - smtp
James A R Brown wrote the following on 23/03/09 14:38:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction to resolving the
> following attempted RPM build on Fedora10 X86_64.
>
> I have tried this now on 2 F10 machines.
>
> I also revisited Postfix 2.4.5 src which used to build on F
16 matches
Mail list logo
