> Why would you want to *modify* the horrible AD schema ?
>
> AD contains plenty of obscure
> "office-phone-except-when-my-wife-is-calling" attribute fields - abuse
> one of them :)
> This has the incredible advantage that the data is actually *visible*
> in
> a user's account tab!
> I would hunt
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of zhong ming wu
> Sent: 16 August 2010 12:02
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent
>
> On Fri, Aug 13
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
> Sent: 15 August 2010 20:54
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent
>
> On 08
Hi,
I'm looking for a bit of inspiration...
I have a number of linux boxes using winbind to provide UNIX system users from
a Win2008R2 Active Directory domain. I'm using winbind's RID idmap backend
thing to provide consistent UNIX UIDs and GIDs across multiple servers. For
non-windows
>If they won't give you a recipient list the easy way, get one the hard way.
> From http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html,
Thanks, I actually enabled recipient address verification, using temporary
reject codes.
Aaron
>Aaron Roberts:
>> Hi all,
>> Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by
>> the bounce daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
>
>
> Wietse Venema:
>You need to solve the right problem. Eliminate the reason why those
>bounce mess
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by the bounce
daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
