Stephen Satchell via Postfix-users:
> Is there any way to specify a rule that takes the AND of two different
> tests? For example, "from:*paypal" and "subject:*invoice"?
This is not documented, and therefore not implemented.
> Or do I need to write a milter to perform more complex checks?
> My
Is there any way to specify a rule that takes the AND of two different
tests? For example, "from:*paypal" and "subject:*invoice"?
Or do I need to write a milter to perform more complex checks?
My goal is to reject mail matching the criteria.
___
Post
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > After setting "postscreen_tls_security_level = none", when I now send a
> > STARTTLS, I get a "502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented", and then
> > /the SMTP session/ stops responding to any subsequent comman
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:59:37PM +1200, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 18/06/2025 22:33, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Prior to making the configuration change, the response to the STARTTLS
> > was "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem", and the SMTP
> > session rem
Nick Tait via Postfix-users:
> On 18/06/2025 22:33, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Prior to making the configuration change, the response to the STARTTLS
> > was "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem", and the SMTP
> > session remained operational, meaning if the client then s
On 2025-06-18 at 06:59:37 UTC-0400 (Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:59:37 +1200)
Nick Tait via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
After setting "postscreen_tls_security_level = none", when I now send
a STARTTLS, I get a "502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented",
That is precisely what I'd expect. No
lejeczek via Postfix-users:
> hi guys.
> All these SELinux denials were caused by an external tool
> (part of the HA management actually & running on the same
> box as postfix), a script which part is:
>
> ??? sendmail)
> ??? sendmail -t -r "${email_sender}" <<__EOF__
> From: ${ema
On 18/06/2025 22:33, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
Prior to making the configuration change, the response to the STARTTLS
was "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem", and the SMTP
session remained operational, meaning if the client then sent another
command (e.g. QUIT), it was p
Nick Tait via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-06-18 12:33:
I hope this is the right forum for reporting a possible bug in
Postscreen? (Apologies if it isn't...)
postconf -Mf
would be helpfull here
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix
Hi there.
I hope this is the right forum for reporting a possible bug in
Postscreen? (Apologies if it isn't...)
I've been using Postscreen without "deep protocol tests" for a long
time, and it has been doing a fantastic job. I recently noticed a log
entry from Postscreen saying "warning: con
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 09:13:25AM +0200, lejeczek via Postfix-users wrote:
> All these SELinux denials were caused by an external tool (part of the HA
> management actually & running on the same box as postfix), a script which
> part is:
>
> sendmail)
> sendmail -t -r "${emai
hi guys.
All these SELinux denials were caused by an external tool
(part of the HA management actually & running on the same
box as postfix), a script which part is:
sendmail)
sendmail -t -r "${email_sender}" <<__EOF__
From: ${email_sender}
To: ${email_recipient}
Return-Pat
12 matches
Mail list logo
