On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 07:46:20PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> Our customer reported that they started migrating users to 365 services
> (yeah, after they started).
>
> Of course, this means that they are unable to send mail from local
> system to addresses in local
Hi All,
Pflogsumm version 1.1.10 has been released. This is a Beta release
that supersedes the v1.1.7 through v1.1.9 Beta releases.
More bug fixes.
>From the ChangeLog:
rel-1.1.10 20250529
Bugfix: Messages rejected in latter SMTP processing, after they'd
already been as
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> Hello,
>
> out customer reported that they started migrating users to 365 services
> (yeah, after they started).
>
> Of course, this means that they are unable to send mail from local system to
> addresses in local domain that are created in 365.
>
>
Hello,
out customer reported that they started migrating users to 365 services
(yeah, after they started).
Of course, this means that they are unable to send mail from local system to
addresses in local domain that are created in 365.
I added t...@example.com to local_recipient_maps so the a
(There should be warnings logged that saywhich table lookup failed.
Does your system perhaps log error and non-error messages to different
files? That is not a good idea - it complicates trouble shooting.)
I'm logging with syslog, mail facility. Debug level has it's own file,
but it's empty. I
On 2025-05-29 at 10:30:50 UTC-0400 (Thu, 29 May 2025 16:30:50 +0200)
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Dear all,
I've a lot of spam coming from xn--n1agk.095.xn--p1acf or variant of
it, but all ends with .xn--p1acf.
This host is reported when I see the full mail head
Dear all,
I've a lot of spam coming from xn--n1agk.095.xn--p1acf or variant of it, but
all ends with .xn--p1acf.
This host is reported when I see the full mail header as:
Received: from xn--n1agk.095.xn--p1acf (xn--n1agk.095.xn--p1acf
[213.202.247.53])
To try to stop it I added in main.cf:
Christian H. Kuhn via Postfix-users:
> Dear Wietse,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> Am 28.05.2025 um 21:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > (There should be warnings logged that saywhich table lookup failed.
> > Does your system perhaps log error and non-error messages to different
Dear Wietse,
thank you for your answer.
Am 28.05.2025 um 21:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
(There should be warnings logged that saywhich table lookup failed.
Does your system perhaps log error and non-error messages to different
files? That is not a good idea - it complicates trou
