On 7/3/25 04:28, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Bill. I ended up registering with
spamhaus.org and followed their guide here:
https://docs.spamhaus.com/datasets/docs/source/40-real-world-usage/MTAs/020-Postfix.html
However, i'm considering postscree
On 2025-03-06 at 04:56:03 UTC-0500 (Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:56:03 +0100)
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 25-03-06 10:38:54, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
On 06-03-2025 09:28, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
Hmm, zen.spamhaus.org doesn't resolve anymore
Jaroslav Škarvada via Postfix-users writes:
> Hi,
>
> gcc-15 defaults to the C23 standard which introduces new keyword
> "bool" and postfix compilation fails:
>
> In file included from anvil_clnt.c:165:
> ./mail_params.h:17:13: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
>17 | typedef int b
Sam James via Postfix-users:
> Jaroslav ?karvada via Postfix-users writes:
> > In Fedora downstream we compile it now with the explicit -std=gnu17,
> > but maybe it could be handled by type rename, stdbool, or preprocessor
> > conditionals
>
> (Please be careful when suggesting that, as the safet
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Bill. I ended up registering with
spamhaus.org and followed their guide here:
https://docs.spamhaus.com/datasets/docs/source/40-real-world-usage/MTAs/020-Postfix.html
However, i'm considering postscreen as perhaps better alternative.
cheers,
Petko
PS: Apol
On 25-03-06 18:02:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 06.03.25 09:28, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
> > The goal was to have my dmarc config as tight as possible. Namely:
> >
> > SPFSelfValidate true
> > SPFIgnoreResults true
> > RejectFailures true
> >
> > Quoting
On 2025-03-06 at 03:28:03 UTC-0500 (Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:28:03 +0100)
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 25-03-05 15:23:11, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2025-03-05 at 11:43:07 UTC-0500 (Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:43:07 +0200)
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
is rumored
Hi,
How would you solve it?
Point relayhost.domain.tld to multiple IPs / servers? If one times out,
the other one will be tried.
Regards
Bjoern
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users
Hi,
gcc-15 defaults to the C23 standard which introduces new keyword
"bool" and postfix compilation fails:
In file included from anvil_clnt.c:165:
./mail_params.h:17:13: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
17 | typedef int bool;
| ^~~~
./mail_params.h:17:13: note: ‘
On 25-03-06 10:38:54, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 06-03-2025 09:28, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Hmm, zen.spamhaus.org doesn't resolve anymore. I wonder what would be the
> > correct/contemporary version of:
> >
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[
On 06-03-2025 09:28, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
Hmm, zen.spamhaus.org doesn't resolve anymore. I wonder what would be the
correct/contemporary version of:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2..11]
Mine also stopped working some time ago, resolved by setting up my ow
On 06-03-2025 09:29, Petko Manolov via Postfix-users wrote:
On 25-03-06 07:45:35, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
On 05-03-2025 21:23, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
You can use the Spamhaus DNSBLs for free if your query volume is low and
your DNS resolver isn't public. DROP is al
Am Mi, Mär 05, 2025 at 13:30:07 -0500 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
If you have more than one, how is the host chosen? Always the first
until it fails? Or always randomly?
In the specified order. Using multiple relayhosts is rare, using
them randomly even rarer.
Strange.
If you hav
On 25-03-06 07:45:35, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 05-03-2025 21:23, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> > You can use the Spamhaus DNSBLs for free if your query volume is low and
> > your DNS resolver isn't public. DROP is also available free as a JSON file
> > which gets change
14 matches
Mail list logo
