On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:30:43PM +1100, duluxoz via Postfix-users wrote:
> I'm using a MariaDB backend to Postfix. Everything is working correctly
> until I attempt to secure the Postfix<->MariaDB connection with a TLS
> Certificate. When I perform a `postmap -q example.com
> mysql:/etc/postfix/
Hi All,
I'm not sure if this is a Postfix issue, a TLS Certificate issue, and/or
a MariaDB issue, so I'm starting here - apologises if this is not the
right place.
I'm using a MariaDB backend to Postfix. Everything is working correctly
until I attempt to secure the Postfix<->MariaDB connecti
On 2025-01-23 14:26, Tomasz Pala via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2025-01-23 12:59, MRob via Postfix-users wrote:
Is that correct? If yes, can we make Postscreen dnsbl_sites lookup
bind
IP for lookups?
I already have inet_interfaces and smtp_bind_address set so I guess
that's not used for dnsbl l
Christian Seberino via Postfix-users wrote:
> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 2
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org*2 bl.spamcop.net*1
> b.barracudacentral.org*1
>
> Is there a "minimal" setting for these two variables that will
> give *some* protection without blocking friendly sites by a
> I'm using zen.spamhaus.org for blocking and list.dnswl.org (with filter)
> for allowlisting.
>
> zen.spamhaus.org*2 list.dnswl.org=127.0.[0..255].[1..3]*-2
excuse me for being overly literal and pedantic. is this
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
On 2025-01-22 16:03, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Hmm. I am not clear why that is blank.
> This is usually an undeliverable mail notification. The null sender
> prevents mailer loops when the notification is also undeliverable.
>
Assigning a valid name to "myhostname" resolved this
Gerben Wierda via Postfix-users:
> I was wondering, suppose I have a user like this:
>
> f...@bar.com is the account name
> foo.lastn...@bar.com is the incoming alias and the outgoing canonical
>
> Could I force incoming mail to accept the alias form, but not
> accept the account form? I.e. f...@
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:01:13PM +0100, Gerben Wierda via Postfix-users wrote:
> Could I force incoming mail to accept the alias form, but not accept
> the account form? I.e. f...@bar.com as address is blocked, but
> foo.lastn...@bar.com is accepted and delivered to f...@bar.com
Postfix access
I was wondering, suppose I have a user like this:
f...@bar.com is the account name
foo.lastn...@bar.com is the incoming alias and the outgoing canonical
Could I force incoming mail to accept the alias form, but not accept the
account form? I.e. f...@bar.com as address is blocked, but foo.lastn..
On 2025-01-23 at 06:59:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:59:41 +)
MRob via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hellos!
I have see spamhaus response sometimes 127.255.255.254 that mean
"generic" DNS lookup source.
Specifically, it means that the DNS query came from a large publicly
acc
On 2025-01-23 12:59, MRob via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Is that correct? If yes, can we make Postscreen dnsbl_sites lookup bind
> IP for lookups?
>
> I already have inet_interfaces and smtp_bind_address set so I guess
> that's not used for dnsbl lookups?
This setting belongs to your system reso
Hellos!
I have see spamhaus response sometimes 127.255.255.254 that mean
"generic" DNS lookup source.
I have three IPs on a virt server, one has PTR mail.exmple.com, other
two are generic for hosting company
I guess spamhaus doesnt like when lookup comes from those 2 addrs
instead of the ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
