> In my situation the mail should be from remote MTA (from port 25).
pedantry warning. not likely. remote client sources from a high port
to connect to server's 25.
randy
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send
On 2024/12/26 06:04, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Cowbay via Postfix-users:
Hello,
My Postfix is 3.4.23-0+deb10u2. It's old.
I got a rare mail with the Resent-Sender header and no other Resent- headers.
Since I configured the local_header_rewrite_clients, cleanup(8) insert the
miss
Cowbay via Postfix-users:
> Hello,
>
> My Postfix is 3.4.23-0+deb10u2. It's old.
>
> I got a rare mail with the Resent-Sender header and no other Resent- headers.
>
> Since I configured the local_header_rewrite_clients, cleanup(8) insert the
> missing Resent- headers for this mail.
>
> Accordi
>> early here and not enough coffee. why would i see different results
>> for the server's v4 address than its v6 address?
>
> You (as others have) might some day deploy separate actual servers
> behind a single logical host with multiple IP addresses
sure. makes sense for some deployments. ju
On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 08:42:51AM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote:
> >>> Randy, I'm disappointed
> >> And I embarrassed. clearly I blew it when creating the new mx
> >> target.
> > I am glad you took the friendly jibe in stride.
>
> stride? i blew it badly, a real stoopid.
>
> > http
>>> Randy, I'm disappointed
>> And I embarrassed. clearly I blew it when creating the new mx
>> target.
> I am glad you took the friendly jibe in stride.
stride? i blew it badly, a real stoopid.
> https://list.sys4.de/hyperkitty/list/dane-us...@list.sys4.de/thread/NKDBQABSTAAWLTHSZKC7P3HALF7VE5
Hello,
My Postfix is 3.4.23-0+deb10u2. It's old.
I got a rare mail with the Resent-Sender header and no other Resent- headers.
Since I configured the local_header_rewrite_clients, cleanup(8) insert the
missing Resent- headers for this mail.
According to RFC 5322 Appendix A.3.
(https://datatr
Hello Wietse Venema,
This will print recipient addresses that were sent over TLS.
Based on your suggestion I improved it a bit. In case someone else has
the same problem here the full script. It prints outgoing non TLS and at
the end a summary.
I'm sending mainly TLS except many DMARC repo
After I couldn't really get amavis to add the DKIM signature or verify
the DKIM signature in conjunction with opendkim, I tried again with the
settings in master.cf. Adding the following entries works wonderfully:
submission inet n - y - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfix/s
