On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 05:54:38AM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
> Here are the output of my postconf -nf (it's quite simple). can you
> give suggestions for better options? Thanks in advance.
This is not a very productive way to get help, you really should be
asking *specific* questions
> My server is still rather new, so I have a not so tight policy set up.
> And I ask for reports at the dmarc record.
You have set the following dmarc record:
$ host -t txt _dmarc.jungersen.dk
_dmarc.jungersen.dk descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;
rua=mailto:postmas...@jungersen.dk";
Danjel Jungersen:
>
>
> On 21 September 2024 14:13:49 CEST, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> >Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> >> I see 3 things that worry me about this record:
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> >>212.27.12.12
> >>2
> >>
> >> none
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> I see 3 things that worry me about this record:
> *
>
>
>212.27.12.12
>2
>
> none
> fail
> fail
>
>
>
> some-real-receiver.tld
><>
Could that be a delivery status noti
Hello everyone!
My server is still rather new, so I have a not so tight policy set up.
And I ask for reports at the dmarc record.
postconf -n
*
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
compatibility_level = 3.6
inet_interfaces = al
On 21/09/24 17:16, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
# postconf -d message_size_limit
message_size_limit = 1024
as you see above, message_size_limit defauts to 10MB?
that would be too limited in my case.
It is very limiting, and to be honest I have increased it on my postfix
as well, but do
