Thank you. If I may ask a question related to why I did this, would
using a different myhostname not cause a problem? Both are supposed to
be for example.com because they handle emails for example.com, one for
receiving and one for sending. The docs do specify to use an FQDN,
that's why I ignor
Samer Afach via Postfix-users:
> postfix/smtp[299]: C0A3C9F906D0: to=,
> relay=10.10.100.100[10.10.100.100]:25, delay=957, delays=950/0.02/6.4/0,
> dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for 10.10.100.100 loops back to myself)
>
And that comes after these warnings:
postfix/smtp[289]: warning: hos
Thank you for the response. I've emptied mydestination explicitly and it
didn't change the outcome (still getting the loops back to myself
error/event). The following is the redacted output of postconf -nf. I
only redacted the domain name and ip address(es).
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
On 2024-07-15 at 10:09:42 UTC-0400 (Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:09:42 +0400)
Samer Afach via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello everyone
I have a setup where my smtp server is reachable through haproxy by
means of networking. But the outgoing email uses an exchange server (a
relay server t
Thank you sir, that's exactly what I was after.
On 11/07/2024 19:49, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
With
main.cf:
disable_dns_lookups = yes
smtp_host_lookup = native
the Postfix SMTP client will usually look in /etc/hosts.
Wietse
___
Hello everyone
I have a setup where my smtp server is reachable through haproxy by
means of networking. But the outgoing email uses an exchange server (a
relay server to the outside world). So the relay server is only used for
sending emails. I do this out of necessity, since the smtp server i
On 2024-07-14 at 20:38:08 UTC-0400 (Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:38:08 +
(UTC))
Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hey all,
The dayjob is attempting to tie VERP into our ticket system (RT with
postfix), and it would be useful to encode not just the magic "from"
addres
On 08.07.24 11:42, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
What you propose use ?
Maybe instead of not accepting such mail will better is change score in SA ?
This is a policy issue. You can choose your policy to be rejecting mail with
spf=fail, both spf=fail and spf=softfail, or reject any mail whe
