On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 10:44:46PM -0700, Simon Thorpe (PST) via Postfix-users
wrote:
> All emails to {alias}@mydomain.com sent onto any of a list of other
> domains, i.e. {alias}@domain1.com, {alias}@domain2.com, etc.
This lists a condition, but no action.
> If I can do this without code and p
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:21 PM Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 2024-07-08 at 17:03:47 UTC-0400 (Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:03:47 -0700)
> Simon Thorpe (PST) via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> Hi
>
> I am working on a Postfix server which accepts email fo
[ No need to "Cc:" me in replies, just reply to the list. It is
unfortunate that mailman moves my address from "From:" to "Reply-To:",
that's very much not my intent. ]
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:50:40AM +1000, hkhk_exact10 wrote:
> > with much additional configuration needed for pam_ldap.
>
>
> with much additional configuration needed for pam_ldap.
>
Can you please provide some details about the configuration for this part.
As mentioned, I have configure ldap via saslauthd by below configurations
]# egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
SOCKETDIR=/run/saslauthd
MECH=ldap
FLAGS=
Hi Patrick,
Cyrus SASL is able to use saslauthd in order to authenticate users in
> /etc/passwd. I don’t know what you did with Cyrus SASL to configure AD
> authentication, but assuming it would be a method called foobar you would
> configure Cyrus SASL to use the following list of password verifi
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 08:34:57PM -0400, Robert Fuhrer via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I've already got that dovecot LDA config line in master.cf (it's how
> delivery for the one login user is set up), though without the "-f"
> flag. I guess the LDA is pulling the "from" address from the
Hi John,
I've already got that dovecot LDA config line in master.cf (it's how delivery
for the one login user is set up), though without the "-f" flag. I guess the
LDA is pulling the "from" address from the email headers.
I think the right thing for me to do is remove unix:passwd.byname from
l
Simon Thorpe (PST) via Postfix-users:
> Hi
>
> I am working on a Postfix server which accepts email for the domain it's
> authoritative for (e.g. mydomain.com) and then duplicates each email to a
> configurable list of other domains, i.e. an email to al...@mydomain.com is
> forwarded onto al...@an
On 2024-07-08 at 17:03:47 UTC-0400 (Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:03:47 -0700)
Simon Thorpe (PST) via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi
I am working on a Postfix server which accepts email for the domain
it's
authoritative for (e.g. mydomain.com) and then duplicates each email
to a
configurable
Hi
I am working on a Postfix server which accepts email for the domain it's
authoritative for (e.g. mydomain.com) and then duplicates each email to a
configurable list of other domains, i.e. an email to al...@mydomain.com is
forwarded onto al...@anotherdomain.com and al...@whatdomain.com.
This se
Did you read the error message:
No valid SPF record for included domain: _spf.cyberfolks.pl:
include:_spf.cyberfolks.pl.
In fact, _spf.cyberfolks.pl does not have an SPF record. Either it needs to
have one published or you need to remove the include.
Scott K
On July 8, 2024 2:47:54 PM UTC, n
Hi
I try onother Permerror but I dont known why
Jul 8 14:28:29 MX postfix/smtpd[48372]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
s10b.cyber-folks.pl[193.17.184.42]: 550 5.7.24 : Recipient
address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF Permanent Error: No valid
SPF record for included domain: _spf.cyberfol
Hi
What you propose use ?
Maybe instead of not accepting such mail will better is change score in SA ?
W dniu 8.07.2024 o 11:36, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
Hi
What value do you use in postfix-policyd-spf in PermError_reject ?
HELO_reject = Fail
Mail_From_reject = Fail
#update 20240706
#P
I am using the default value:
PermError_reject = True
But it totally depends by you.
On 2024-07-08 17:36, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
What value do you use in postfix-policyd-spf in PermError_reject ?
HELO_reject = Fail
Mail_From_reject = Fail
#update 20240706
#PermError_reject = False
Hi
What value do you use in postfix-policyd-spf in PermError_reject ?
HELO_reject = Fail
Mail_From_reject = Fail
#update 20240706
#PermError_reject = False
PermError_reject = True
TempError_Defer = False
I don't know if that's maybe too restrictive PermError_reject
But on the other hand, the se
Am 2024-07-08 06:52, schrieb Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users:
* Allen Coates via Postfix-users:
I am blocking 2001:db8::/32 (of course); it's the Teredo prefix
which I am allowing.
I misunderstood the word "these" in your OP, and the subject line only
referenced the documentation prefix, but
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 08:39:54AM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > I want to setup SMTP authentication in such a way that the user
> > should first be looked locally (/etc/passwd) and then in AD. Is it
> > possible to do so? I was able to configure AD auth via sasl (cyrus)
17 matches
Mail list logo
