Dnia 3.02.2024 o godz. 12:59:27 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> These days, users are far better off with delivery to an IMAP store that
> is not tied directly to any login account they may or may not have.
> Perhaps they authenticate to Dovecot via PAM, but the mail store should
> o
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:57:05PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
> > The "local" transport is a legacy Sendmail-compatibilty interface,
> > and should generally be avoided.
>
> Why avoided? If you have local Unix users on your server, and you want those
> users to receive mail, th
On 2024-02-03 at 08:52:17 UTC-0500 (Sat, 3 Feb 2024 05:52:17 -0800)
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> All,
>
> Pretty simple question:
>
> We have an internal domain, zimbra.example.org, but it's only used for
> internal routing of our corporate mail (there's a master deli
Dnia 3.02.2024 o godz. 10:33:58 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
> The "local" transport is a legacy Sendmail-compatibilty interface,
> and should generally be avoided.
Why avoided? If you have local Unix users on your server, and you want those
users to receive mail, this is the most eas
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 05:52:17AM -0800, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> We have an internal domain, zimbra.example.org, but it's only used for
> internal routing of our corporate mail (there's a master delivery map
> that controls what addresses at example.org route to
> zimbra.example.o
All,
Pretty simple question:
We have an internal domain, zimbra.example.org, but it's only used for internal
routing of our corporate mail (there's a master delivery map that controls what
addresses at example.org route to zimbra.example.org). We have other domains
under example.org such as l
